“Well the AIM-120 is widely exported and even it seems Jordan will soon get it. Even with the recent Israeli lobbying Jordan is still likely to get the AIM-120”
The ones Jordan will get cannot be fired at Israeli planes I heard. So its basically pointless. Jordan has no other threats apart from Israel.
This post and subsequent arguments made along these lines are hilarious. Anyone who has a copy of the article from which the above extracts can check and will see that the same Shahid Lateef in the same article – after stating the above goes on to say that – the chinese rose to the challenge posed by Pakistans requirements and have now put a package on the table which is being considered. (I am not at home at the moment so I will post the exact wording later on today)
I wonder why the above poster – while diligently repeating the negative comments about Chinese systems totaly neglects to mention the positive conclusion of Lateefs comments in the same article. Perhaps he stopped reading half way – or perhaps the rest of the article didn’t support the biased point he is trying to make.
I’ve been saying exactly that (goto Page 1) , but he keeps comming back to this again and again.
Chinese into this stuff?? and India possibly? I think India had something like SATI (I’m guessing the name..dont remember)? ..like it’ll shoot powerfull beam of energy from here to up there…
duh guys move on, cant be ‘contained’ by few ppl on same old things repeated 20 times..(in the end..”but who was Romeo?”)..
Lets discuss what radar is on the table for JF-17, then we can compare it to RC-400 and Grifo S7…
Rc-400 has range ~ 100km
Grifo S7 ~ 100km, but is problematic as told in the interview.
Chinese Radar, which one are we talking about? something between KLJ-1 and JL-10A
Ranges arent everything (dont have much info, will dig out and post later on during spare time), so lets feed the thread instead of feeding ahem ahem..dont fall for the “same old trap” guys π
and Nirav, dont worry about my exams, thanks for showing concerns, and dont worry, if I goto Exams tomorow also..I’ll pass. well thanks anyway.
2. I’m not claiming that Chinese radar/avionics are bad. It was PAF which is saying that.
“was”
You could not defend a single argument you made to me and were forced to terminate it.
Ergo, my nick π
Do keep off the personal attack going forward will ya?
I can tell you Romeo and Juliet 20 times and you’ll again ask who was Romeo. Some ppl just dont want to accept a thing. So why waste my precious time on something so unimportant?
lol ya..its gotten to the point of “pointless” ….
and ppl like Nirav..metal head…true lol…(he said it himself)
“BS Terminator”…now thats sarcastic isnt it?
As I once told Wolverine…(not meant towards him)..some ppl just dont “get it” dude..thats ^ 3rd and 4rth ^ example there.
anyway, gtg..exams..expect me to be absent for few days..jee I’m gonna miss all BS termination and Nirav’s jokes..np you can pm me.
F-16A/B but the comparisons is still quite a bitlopsided since the FC-1 is a smaller aircaft and thus not 100% comparable to the F-16.
Yes, major advatange to F-16 A/B is superior engine thrust, that alone effects many things.
Sadat said in start of sept,
US gov at end of Sept:
The most that a top U.S. government official has said publicly is that such a sale is a possibility. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage said in a Sept. 29 interview with a Pakistani television station that F-16s are βstill on the tableβ¦weβve had discussions with the Pakistani authorities about these matters, and Iβll just leave it right there.β
–
Anyway he also said F-16s would be a bonus, its not in the picture anymore for PAF.
as speculated earlier..F-16 is a hopeless case lol.
Read AVM Lattef’s statement man. He said Chinese radar tech is years behind West. He was not referring to AESA either, was he?
– and then he says he’s happy with it..
So what is this “guidance”? Does this mean that all PAF has to do is give “guidance” and get products? Why no give such “guidance” to PAC Kamra and get a super-duper radar made out of the Grifo-7PGs? How about “guidance” to AWC and getting a 150 km BVRAAM?
– again!! arggh lol, Again Chinese needed to know what exactly PAF needs!! cant you get that… and we paid for it..not free…what does that means?? We tell em these are the demands..you do the supply..and we pay the price..
The only logical explanation is that PAF could not afford an RC-400 or Grifo S7 in numbers so they have settled for cheaper Chinese stuff. The capabilities are clearly lesser than what PAF wanted as stated by AVM Lateef.
– The only logical conclusion is you are using selective quoting and missing the whole point. AVM Lateef stated earlier Chinese werent good enough, NOW THEY ARE, –> “However, They promised to improve their technologies, and with our guidance – and more time – they have met our expectations“.
^ Thats what he said eventually. ^
FC-1 radar and avionics which they were sure will be Western.
Now their claims are gone.
They were being made with the news that was available at that time..see we dont have Tantrik Babas to look into future here in Pakistan.
Golden arrow
word Games again??…i’m not comparing Chinese Radars to “best” of Thales…but to kinds of Rc-400.
God..can you even read what Am I posting, or you being the champion of flamers lately?
“However, They promised to improve their technologies, and with our guidance – and more time – they have met our expectations”
The Expectations were met by the guidance, means they were told what needs to done, it has been done… so it has met the expectations.
So much for “BS Terminator” lol
BTW, you have done some selective posting yourself. Right below that part you posted, Lateef says that Chinese radar tech is not as good as the Western ones. Those are his words, not mine π
…who denies that anyway? Infact, if you read..he also says he’s impressed by Chinese.
The explanation is clear. If you want Grifo or Thales, you need to pay $$$, which would increase the unit cost to way beyond the around $20 million currently quoted. So our man is settling for Chinese tech which he himself trashed.
[b] :-/ lol? He’s impressed by Chinese, and said Chinese products are now good enough. Why pay for RC-400 or grifo-s7 when there is better and cheaper alternative available…Rc-400 and Grifo-S7 are being talked about for years now…and Chinese have moved ahead since then.
As to the guidance part, I find it funny. It’s like my friend saying that the Kia car he has is not as good as the BMW, but with his “guidance”, Kia has made a car equal to the BMW. π If he is able to provide “guidance”, then why not make it himself. π I’d like to know what this “guidance” is. :rolleyes:
[b]Thats your interpretation..one cannot dispute personal interpretations..personal and unique thought these are. but I understand that as the stated requirements Chinese would have to make if the Radar is to goto JF-17
” other from the best available French or Italian stuff “
and Golden Arrow thinks Rc-400 is the best French have..twinkle twinkle little stars…and humpty dumpty fell.
“Grifo S7, RC-400 and every other Western radar is in the market today. So, why are 50 FC-1s getting Chinese stuff if the final solution is not Chinese?”
Are they not available to LCA also?? why MMR then? You still missing the point…Chinese are now offering a radar atleast as capable as Grifo and rc-400..and it costs less..now why the hell would we buy a more expensive thing? If you read that AFM interview, GrifoS7 seems to have some problems too.
“Given enough money, FIAR or Thales or whoever in the West will make you whatever you need.”
Sure, but PAF’s req. atm is not AESA you see ;). its something around ~ Rc-400 and grifo-s7..China is giving a better deal..so why bother with expensive option? Paghal Kutte nay nahi kaata. π
“The last few comments of AVM Lateef clearly hint that for the low $$$, only China can give PAF something that they cannot get elsewhere while noting that it is years behind Western tech.”
Since when is Pak going to war with West?
“BTW, with Chinese radar and avionics, one can forget about FC-1s handling Western AAMs and AGMs”
Sd-10 over MICA anyday π
________________________________________________________________
Savage-Rabbit:
people have been quoting for an FC-1 eqipped with top of the line FIAR or Thales gear sounds a bit to good to be true
What PAF wanted for JF-17 isnt top-of-the-line of West, more like Med-tech,
—
Bottom Line: China is offering a more or equally capable Radar, why on his Dying planet should PAF opt for expensive option..thats the only reason I think would make PAF go for Chinese….lets not forget PAF has been evaluating all the options.
My postion is very clear: PAF will choose what is more capable and within rational price limit.
—
Intrestingly, some ppl are hanged to personal opinions and thoughts of some ppl, an they’re being highly ‘selective’ about those. You’l accept one opinion from them, but deny any others they make.
Anyway I’ve made my points clear. I’m out until we have something new. and remember ..theres no confirmation of the news yet..so be cautious of whatever you say
Also remember Price is not the unit of capability, that makes Gripen more capable than Su-30mki :rolleyes:
Whoever thinks China cannot make a radar as good as Rc-400 can ‘bring it on’.
π
Well so much for “selective” quoting by the “BS Terminator”. He missed one part..here it is:
“However, They promised to improve their technologies, and with our guidance – and more time – they have met our expectations”
Golden Arrow..its right below what you posted π
The point is that certain people, supposed good friends of China, have been trashing the Chinese tech in radar and avionics and said that PAF FC-1 will have this, that and the other from the best available French or Italian stuff but are now scurrying to run away from their own past claims.
Playing word games?? no ones been trashing Chinese Radar Tech…..Maybe you took it out of context..i mean if we were talking about original f-7s sold back in time…anyway you miss the point again, PAF is satisfied with What China is offering comparing to what Italy or French are offering. The minimal info we have of J-10 radar is suggests its better than grifo s7 and rc-400. A derivative of J-10 holds more promise than close-sourced western radar. For starters…Sd-10 isnt an integration problem anymore…also Pak doesnt needs to go to two parties for integration..now al you gota do is call up Chinese friends.