dark light

phrozenflame

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 988 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2658907
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Seahawk,

    you cant blame them. they dont get the type of funding that other 4/5th gen programs do. SeaHawk,

    you lost me here

    Well Indians seem to be getting funding for everything else but LCA? ….You do have tendency to do lots of foriegn investment when it comes to defence matters 😉 despite having claimed that local product is superior and far more cost effective.

    The LCA is also cheaper than other 4th gen fighters..and why did you even mention 5th gen fighter(s?)?? so it simply does not needs as much investment as other fighters. This is no excuse, the dates been pushed back to 2009….by the time it comes into service..it’ll be lagging behind Gripen.

    And ppl still need to prove that the economies of scale for LCA have been maximised and its at the optimum level.

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660023
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    and no datalinks? WTF?

    How many actual planes do have datalinks…out of what 900 or so planes?

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660432
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Indian1973..you actually beleive F-7 will serve until 2025!?

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660451
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Well, no needto bring Pak and China here plz, what 2025?? they’ll kick the f-7s out way earlier…its overdue already.

    in reply to: Does the LCA program make sense? #2660507
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    > my confidence in mr. warnes is not very high right now. the FC-1 and PAF articles look like cut-n-paste from a propaganda handout.
    PAF has claimed most credit for “designing” the Fc-1 🙂 poor Chengdu relegated to a secondary role 🙁

    Your confidence does not matter, nor anyone cares, and where did PAF claim most of the designing credit?? plz enlighten us…

    and just becuase you dont Like Mr. Alan Warnes comments..AFM all of the sudden becomes Propaganda Handout….so much for the little bit of confidence anyone had in you.

    in reply to: LCA Progress #2660748
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    We had no infrastructure,

    You Did

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2660876
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    well..any info we dont know on that page ?

    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Why would Russia wish to attack China..arent commie + commie = Brothers… ??

    in reply to: PAF purchases 7 Erieyes #2662467
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Mirage is stil an option, its not closed..its damn too expensive.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2663955
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    GD:
    I dont know if its an official release..but I first saw it here:
    http://www.paf.gov.pk/intro/aircrafts/aircraft_gal2.asp?type=3&img=JF172.jpg

    Read on Pakdef, PAF got a site, so I visited it and saw the pic over there which I posted here…PAF site had no copyright notice on the site..dunno :-/

    phrozenflame
    Participant

    anyone got Chinese plane models for X-plane..interested in Jf-17 and J-10…

    Also Excellent work you guys..after visiting these kind of threads..I always d/l a 3d program, but when I open it , I loose all the motivation :-/, so I head back to other stuff…not enough time to learn this things…but lucky guys you are…imagination into reallity :rolleyes:

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2664260
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    the pic aint that accurate..wing tipcs, look at the air intake..v.big..so is the leading wing..which is very wide..and theres a missile missile on the left..no fair..the artist didnt show us the firing 🙁 but hey the camo is wicked :).

    Anyway PAF should employ a better 3D artist next time.

    in reply to: PAF purchases 7 Erieyes #2664451
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    PLA..the above FC-1 pics, can you plz put them in the FC-1 thread since its bumped now, I would have done it but im behind hardware firewall which will not allow me to attach files :-/ , ?

    Also whats that pic saying..red chinese fonts pointing…?

    and offcourse, thanks for the pics PLA 🙂

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2664454
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Enjoy…

    http://www.paf.gov.pk/intro/aircrafts/airimages/JF172.jpg

    in reply to: PAF purchases 7 Erieyes #2665449
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    heard the latest version was infact AWACS?

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 988 total)