dark light

phrozenflame

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 988 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2686731
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Nice to hear AFM describes the plane as “Fourth Generation” , another arguement buried. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Pak Government can purchase spares for F-16 from US #2687287
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    I posted the news, if you have problems..go to the editor

    in reply to: Pak Government can purchase spares for F-16 from US #2687390
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    okay once we have the mod..they can be merged..and most of the times its flamers who take the threads to 4-5 pages..not PAF fans….we cant have a clean discussion..thats why a new thread has to be started because previous ones are being hijacked by some 13 y/o lamers who just discovered BR.

    and thiss will continue until someone takes actions to stop the lamers and village idiots

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2687564
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    What exactly is meant by PAF’s westernised ideas?

    Western Avionics..what else?

    in reply to: PAF to purchase 35 ex Libyan Mirages #2688060
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    so 4 Billion will only get 40 Gripens..thats expensive…!! Hope Swedes allow bit of tech to be used into JF-17 too

    in reply to: Gripen to Pakistan? #2688126
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    200 FC-1s
    80 Gripens
    100 F-PGs
    30 F-16s
    7 Erieye
    7 Tankers

    Now thats my dream PAF!

    More realistic Figure:

    150 Fc-1s
    40-80 Gripens
    current # of PGs
    To hell with F-16s
    4 Erieye
    no idea about tankers

    in reply to: Gripen to Pakistan? #2688157
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    hmm..JF-17 and Gripen will make a nice combination..lil wicked fighters 😉

    in reply to: Gripen to Pakistan? #2688210
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Guys dont go off-topic, typical BRatish tactic,

    About Swedes publishing the news, most of their news sites are in Swede :-/

    Well I just contacted Gripen Team regarding the news, I doubt they will ever reply but hey..just for the sake of it.

    in reply to: Hello Pakistani friend #2688221
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    you could have PMed any PDF member, no need to start a thread.

    in reply to: Typhoons for Saudi Arabia? #2691165
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Why are Saudis not buying Sukhoi?? it could possibly come with huge ToT ??

    mean..its about time they atleast depend upon themselves on something…

    phrozenflame
    Participant

    is the white one f-17?

    in reply to: First real foreign order of FC-1 #2691246
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    isnt FC-1 the first ‘market-oriented’ product??? or there have been others in the past?

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2691249
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    since when did Iran got into arms race with Iraq???? new WWE gimick or what??

    Last thing i know they’re more concerned with immenent Israeli threat to there nuke assets.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2692302
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    well i think you answered your own question there. the J10 with advanced western radar and avionics would be cheaper and more capable then most of the western 3rd gens on the market and not far off from the euro-canards, so why would any western supplier give the J10 their avionics and radar so that the J10 can take orders from their fighters?

    what does the French make more from, selling radars and avionics for J10s which in turn would be sold to a thrid party, or selling M2K-5/9s directly to that thrid party?

    the only thing that may persuade the French to sell radars and avionics to the J10 is if the PLAAF have all their J10s fitted with the same radar. only then will it be worth while for the French.

    however, the PLAAF wont take foreign kit unless it comes with full ToT and licence production in country later. and again we hit a snag as the French would not be willing to do that, cos then they would loose all their technical edge in a few years, and their next gen fighters wont be able to compete with their chinese counterparts, as the chinese made fighters will almost certainly be cheaper, and will most likely be on par in terms of performance.

    they can generate sales by radar or no sales at all, I bleleive Avionics have larger profit margins then airframes..?

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2692397
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    the initial version inducted earlier will be upgraded as well or the newer versions will have the enhancements?

Viewing 15 posts - 586 through 600 (of 988 total)