dark light

phrozenflame

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 988 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2694113
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Sarah Cyr, Explain to us how its a trash ‘mig-21’ upgrade plz…

    in reply to: FC-1 thread – (Prototype 03 onward) #2694505
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    ^^^ ya salaam….hiloo

    in reply to: Vympel offers new R-27EP anti-radar missile #2694509
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    8g…will be a competition to get a fighter plane…

    in reply to: New SD-10 pic! (?) #2694890
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    someone reads chinese might tell us whats written…

    (thanks to mandrake at PDF for the pics)

    in reply to: New SD-10 pic! (?) #2694915
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    http://61.132.72.44/dswc/upload/images/29791620733.jpg

    anyone id following missiles?
    http://eapple.com.cn/UploadFile/2004-4/2004425102755432.jpg

    in reply to: FAO Webmaster, Where is Crobato in Voting? #2694922
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    oh okay, sorry i did not know that.

    in reply to: FC-1 deliveries to begin in 2006 to PAF #2696165
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by saf2000
    Non of the articles i have read about Fc-1 make any clarification about the arrangements for the supply of RD93 engine. Will RD93 be manufactured in China? Who will supply the spares? will Russia be able to stop the supply of spares under Indian pressure during any conflict?
    .

    The Engine will be licence built by Liyang Machinery Corporation in China.
    and GD there is no point in discussing further, I mean I remember how everyone told us no FBW no FBW, but see…its just a matter of time..we told them this before..we tell them this now ;)..when they’ll see in PLAAF..they’ll beleive

    in reply to: FC-1 deliveries to begin in 2006 to PAF #2696346
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Points to Ponder:

    -The JF-17/FC-1 is described as a multirole attack fighter with delta wings, a conventional tail and a fly-by-wire flight-control system. It is powered by a Russian Klimov RD-93 turbofan engine (derived from the RD-33 engine) and rated at 81.4kN (18,300 lb st) with reheat. There is also an air-to-air refuelling capability.

    -The avionics suite is of Chinese origin, comprising a smart head-up display, infra-red search-and-track system, night-vision goggle capability and ring-laser gyro inertial navigation system with GPS. An advanced radar is expected to be procured from French, Italian or Russian sources.

    -With reports that the PLA Air Force plans to acquire about 1,000 of these aircraft

    See !! We’ve been yelling!! that FBW exists!! PLA will buy but no ppl wont agree..well finally..peace
    :).

    As for above comments..USAF doesnt needs F-16, everything can be done by F-15s..but they still operate F15s,F16s, and F-18s.

    in reply to: Well… since no one's got the nerves "YET"!!! #2696418
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    matter of time before we fly Fc-1s and J-10s on our PCs…dunno whats takin them so long..maybe C syntax isnt in chinese yet?? 😮

    in reply to: update on South Korean T-50 #2696423
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    If USA was involved heavilly in LCA and FC-1 programs..they’d be in service by now 😉

    in reply to: Nice F-5 picture #2696484
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    ppl say ever-green..i’d say ever-sexy

    in reply to: Great HAF F-16 video #2696548
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    its pointless zipping video files, atleast with corupt video files you can extract the data and view something, with zip gone corrupt…khalli wali

    in reply to: Anti-NEO (asteroid) weapons #2696581
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by google
    Hmm, perhaps the dinosaurs tried praying, but I bet it didn’t help them very well.:)

    nay, they were dumb..I bet they all walked towards the ‘incomming’ light to see that maybe it had some new tasty food.

    in reply to: J-10 MASS Production Starts. #2696584
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Russia I still beleive is No.2 in aviation followed by Dassault, then European Union. China I would say in top 4 or 5.

    in reply to: Israel sees missile-protected El Al plane by June #2696625
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by djnik

    The problem that i still see is that apart from that system as airliner’s defence,even if some missile does pass it,airliner cannot manouvre that much while taking off and landing due to low speed.

    Still gives them some chance of survival

Viewing 15 posts - 721 through 735 (of 988 total)