dark light

phrozenflame

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 988 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pakistan is a Key US Ally #2659108
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by SabreAce
    You’re correct. It offers everthing over the FC-1. 😀

    He means the F-16s which are likely to be offered to PAF… (same old crap)

    in reply to: India signs 795mn pound deal for AJTs #2659116
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by Srbin
    795mn pounds=1.455bn USD.

    I don’t know but 20mn for each Hawk is VERY overpriced, it’s ridicilous, I’d rather get the 10-12mn Yak-130 which is a lot more capable.

    isnt the price = LCA according to some members?…

    in reply to: General Discussion #382198
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by PLA
    Accepted. This was my last non aviation topic. I was just informing people here cause it is a nice game between to countries that are very overwhelming represented in this forum. But accepted.

    post it on general discussion..or ask webby to move it there..

    in reply to: Cricket Pakistan India 2-1 #1966871
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by PLA
    Accepted. This was my last non aviation topic. I was just informing people here cause it is a nice game between to countries that are very overwhelming represented in this forum. But accepted.

    post it on general discussion..or ask webby to move it there..

    in reply to: Fc-1A changes #2659140
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    To be precise:

    FC-1A news

    It is reported because the FC-1 fighter plane prototype test flight displays good, according to uses the side the opinion, Cheng Fei carries on the revision for the FC-1 fighter plane use technology, and determines 2006 the production configuration FC-1A technical specification: * Changes to the digital entire jurisdiction fax control system * to carry on the revision to ?? the even tail geometry shape, and enlarges the area, enhances the operation efficiency * to reinforce certain spots the fuselage structure, enhances the fatigue life, enhances the airplane to hang carries the ability. * use computer assistance revision contour design, reduces the radar wave echo area, reduces the flight resistance Outside the airplane data revises for is biggest hangs 4.5 tons, most greatly total weight 13.14 tons, biggest use table fast 1,350 kilometers/hours

    This pastes by xingkongabc to March 19, 2004
    Edition: Long Xin

    LINK: http://www.wforum.com/specials/articles/04/1625.html

    in reply to: 6 Questions About The PAF! Please Help! #2659642
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Re: 6 Questions About The PAF! Please Help!

    Originally posted by Bahnhaus
    I would be grateful if you could answer some of the questions that I have:

    1. Have the PAF receieved the 60 Helicopter Gunships that were sold ? what type were they ? Cobras/Apaches ?

    2. How many JF-17s/FC-1’s is Pakistan to purchase over the next few years ?, Also what radar will be fitted on these ? and ejection seat ? BVR Missile ?

    3.Is Pakistan also to get the J-10 ?, Will the Chinese allow the sale ?

    4. The older F-7’s have they all be replaced by the newer models or is this still to be done ?

    5. What happend to the Quatari Mirages that the PAF was eyeing ? No Mirages ?

    6. Also has the upgrades at Chakala AFB been started/Finished

    ?

    1: No Apaches, few cobras, not specifically made for Army.

    2. 150-200, RC-400, Griffo S7 are rumoured to be top runners, no one can exactly say which radar, they’re still evaluating..ejection seat is likely to be chinese i guess…

    3. PAf would like to have J-10, Chinese atm are more concerend about filling up numbers for there AF, so not in few years time. PAF would prefer a western plane anyway, or maybe J-10 with western avionics would a lethal combination.

    4. I dont think so, one F-7 crashed today. Replacing A-5s is the prioriy.

    5. They’re going to India, there is no point PAF purchasese 10 or so M2ks.

    6. No idea.

    thanks

    in reply to: Pakistan is a Key US Ally #2659949
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    first of all i’d like to say i understand the jealousy of some posters here for some obvious reasons, so m not bothering replying to them. Forget MMA, read this and stop burning, and learn to earn repsect, koz thats what ppl collect.

    19 March 2004 Friday 27 Muharram 1425
    86pc Pakistanis like Musharraf: survey
    WASHINGTON, March 18: A vast majority of Pakistanis, about 86 per cent, rates President Pervez Musharraf favourably, says a survey by a major American organization.

    The report by the Washington-based Pew Research Center also says that 60 per cent Pakistanis view President Musharraf “very favourably.” This is “by far the highest rating of any leader in the survey,” says poll director Andrew Kohut. “Pakistanis expressed highly favourable opinions of their president.”

    The Pew Research Center is a non-profit and non-governmental organization, which specializes in opinion surveys. Its reports are widely respected in Washington’s academic circles.

    The researchers surveyed public opinions in nine countries, asking a randomly selected group of people questions on various subjects, ranging from the war in Iraq to their opinion about their own leaders and about other major US allies in the war on terror.

    The survey says that most Europeans had no views about Gen Musharraf and a third or more in each of the nine countries except Pakistan gave no opinion. Views of President Musharraf were more positive than negative in Turkey, and were about evenly divided in Britain, the United States, Russia, and Jordan. Negative opinion of Gen Musharraf was strong in France, Germany and Morocco.

    Majorities in every country surveyed except the United States had an unfavourable opinion of President Bush, with negative ratings ranging from 57 per cent in Britain to 85 per cent in both France and Germany.

    Outside the United States, the support for Mr Bush is the highest in Britain, 39 per cent. Six-in-ten have an unfavourable view of Mr Bush in Russia, and two-thirds – 67 per cent – feel this way in Turkey.

    so to hell with MMA, and its extremist crap…Majority of Pakistanis support Musharraff and his policies…jeeez now i just increased someone’s jealousy even more..(sorry lol)..

    F-16s over FC-1 is NO NO, F-16s (from aid package) along with FC-1..why not?? 😉

    PLA ignore the flamers, when one stops showing bone, the dog stops barking, you cannot cure it brother…one cannot straighten the tail of the dog, why bother?? it might bite you instead, so ignoring is the best policy.

    in reply to: Question about J-10 pics #2660405
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    whats that ‘Boeing’ poster doing there? and any info which plane it has??

    in reply to: new F/A-22 unit cost #2660415
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    sunks costs cant be recovered, unit costs can be brought down by economics of scale, which can be achived through high production.

    phrozenflame
    Participant

    NECESSITY

    Tank T – 59, which has been in use with Pakistan Army, is being upgraded under a phased programme since 1990. After having completed 1st phase of upgrade in1997, the 2nd phase has been launched in 1998 with a total of 50 upgrade features, which have given a quantum technological leap to this old tank.

    Owing to their large population, Pakistan Army can not afford to discard / phase out all T-59 tanks in the foreseeable future. It is therefore essential to keep these tanks operationally and technologically compatible with the modern tanks in use with our adversary.

    TOP

    CONCEPT

    It is envisaged to utilize stretch potential of T – 59 tank through upgrade in fire power, mobility and armour protection at a fraction of the cost of a modern main battle tank.

    TOP

    MODERNIZATION PARAMETERS

    As an R & D project three prototypes are being prepared with a view to incorporating the following :

    125mm Smooth Bore Gun

    700 HP Engine

    Compatible Gun Control and Fire Control System

    Add-on Armour / Explosive Reactive Armour

    TOP

    PROGRESS

    3 X Prototypes have been prepared with the following features :

    Prototype – 1

    125 mm smooth Bore Gun with semi auto loading mechanism, major improvements in the turret and Gun Control System

    690 HP Power Pack (5TDF) with upgrade / reinforced suspension system

    Enhanced armour protection through add-on armour

    Prototype – 2

    690 HP Engine (V46 – 5M)

    Modified Transmission

    Improved Suspension

    Explosive Reactive Armour and Antimine Bottom Plate

    Prototype – 3

    730 HP Engine and Improved Transmission

    125 mm Smooth Bore Gun

    Semi – Automatic Loading System

    Image Stabilized Fire Control and Improved Gun Control System

    Improved Suspension

    Enhanced Armour protection with Explosive Reactive Armour

    TOP

    TESTS / TRIALS

    All the prototypes have undergone successful summer mobility and fire power trials for user / technical evaluation to ascertain viability of upgrade / performance improvement over the basic T – 59 tank.

    offcourse not as good as abrams, but look at the price, and if armed with good ammunition, the tank can be dangerous 😉 , remember it’s not upgraded to fight Abrams, but Indian T-72s.
    As I said, Filling up of numbers for Saudis, maybe for interior security, you know Protection of Royal Family, internal political stuff…just a thougt.

    http://www.pakdef.info/ideas2002/alzarrar_front.jpg
    http://www.pakdef.info/ideas2002/alzarrarinterior.jpg
    Courtesy: Pakdef.info

    in reply to: Israeli Apache Longbow #2660463
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Im jealous 😉

    West really makes sure the stuff looks secksy.

    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by rockgordon
    Oh really smart guy? pitch those 5 al-zarrars against a single Abrams and see your crappy renamed T-55 go up in smoke within no time! And you wanna take on Israel with those? Good luck!

    if you think Al-Zarar is a renamed T-55…then i wont even bother replying to next part of your post 😉

    in reply to: Question about J-10 pics #2661103
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by aerospacetech
    Note the HUD looks suspiciously like the “Smart HUD” displayed at Zhuhai…

    Can you display that here also? 😉

    thanks

    once we know the avionics, I’m going to post J-10 vs M2k & F-16 , they’re in the same league, so its going to be interesting.

    in reply to: Metric-wave digital phased array radar? #2661127
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    ‘This would thus still mean that the F-22 could shoot down the interceptors with BVR since the ground radar cannot have enough accurace for BVR launch’

    Not entirly correct, the missiles are likely to have there own Guidance system/seeker, the radar would guide the missile that ok boy you go there..when u’r there…open ur eyes and look around..did you see anything?? goood…kill the bitch for mother russia!

    phrozenflame
    Participant

    makes sense, it was in the news before, forget the other crap, general reporter non-sense.

    ‘Amazingly enough, them saudis don’t like our Abrams nomore!’

    Its not they dont like it anymore, but can they trust americans during a war to maintain there fleet? (if its against israel?), i think one can get 5 al-zarrars in price of one Abram (nut sure), Good enough firepower. One could say it could be stop-gap measure, or just filling up of numbers.

    anyway..another good news (dene wala jub bhi deta, deta chappar parh keh :p :p 😉 😀 😀 )

    US to make Pakistan non-NATO ally: ISLAMABAD, March 18: US Secretary of State Colin Powell announced today the United States will designate Pakistan a “major non-NATO ally,” in a move that will boost military cooperation between the two countries. “I advised the foreign minister this morning that we will also be making a notification to our Congress that will designate Pakistan as a major non-NATO ally for the purposes of our future military to military relations,” Powell told a press conference after meeting Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri. The designation means that certain restrictions on arms sales are dropped. Pakistan will join a handful of other countries such as Japan, Thailand, Kuwait, Egypt, Israel and Jordan in receiving preferential treatment from the United States on the military front. (AFP) (Posted @ 10:45 PST)

    😎

Viewing 15 posts - 796 through 810 (of 988 total)