dark light

phrozenflame

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 988 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Pak-Saudi joint missile-nuclear agreement. #2664370
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by PLA
    KSA… They have nice and exotic arms but no idea about software restrictions or pilots. For being a threat. Let me be honest. If many arab countries could not handle Israel why should the Saudi be able to it alone and with US arms? I doubt that.

    not to forget Israel was more weaker at that time. Guess who started this topic..our Cartoon No.1

    in reply to: Interesting LCA Pic #2664375
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by sharmaji
    Its inferiority complex at its best really, let us compare the LCA with Tigersharks etc and compare our Super 7 with F-16s to make us feel better about ourselves, pakdef at it again. 😀

    where did Pakdef come from?? lol…using a line which is used against you?? another example of you know what lol.

    ‘Phrozenflame are you going to post every single garbage you find on the net? ‘

    You do that all the time, so why have a problem when i posted one thing 😛 Another proof of you guys know what lol.

    I’m going out of this topic, you guys keep pondering it..(even tho you admit its crap but still keep comming back..not my problem anymore)

    in reply to: Interesting LCA Pic #2664780
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    AGREED, but dont blame me!! i dint make them,just posted them for the sake of it!!!

    arthus..second one would be m2k and fc-1 nose lol

    in reply to: General Discussion #384372
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    they have caught few indians and morocans in this case..once OBL is caught..hopefully we’ll eliminate these *******s who think they’re great muslims~ (one can argue and say they dont even fit into Islamic Laws anymore)

    you cant blame the muslims..you can blame OBL.

    in reply to: At least 130 killed in Madrid train blasts #1968371
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    they have caught few indians and morocans in this case..once OBL is caught..hopefully we’ll eliminate these *******s who think they’re great muslims~ (one can argue and say they dont even fit into Islamic Laws anymore)

    you cant blame the muslims..you can blame OBL.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread (news and pictures) #2664809
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by matt
    STICK :p

    Unless the F-22 frigate/destroyer is a sailing ship…:confused:

    well no, they use paddles instead with a huge sail (stole it from Master and Commander), now now enough sarcasm, lets stop it before someone with high sensitivities arrives (lets hope its not sabreace lol)

    in reply to: Interesting LCA Pic #2664811
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by SabreAce

    Sigh, when people try to flame or troll, they should atleast be good at it instead of making themselves look more and more like dumbfuks.

    THAT WAS UNCALLED FOR!

    Pakistanis, dont reply to him, lets save him some dignity. Report this to webby instead.

    in reply to: Interesting LCA Pic #2664928
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    dunno..i can

    in reply to: Analyzing China’s Defense Industries #2664946
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Just for more solid Proof, one can visit: http://pakistanidefence.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=9734

    100s if not 1000s of Chinese Millitary production pics…it makes me jelous..will make you too..unless ur from USA .

    in reply to: FC-1 thread (news and pictures) #2664948
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by matt
    :confused:

    Must be some advance technology.. So its really a UCAV? Does the “stick” have AI ?

    I meant Joystick..some ppl claim it to be as advanced as F-22 (guess who lol)

    in reply to: Pak-Saudi joint missile-nuclear agreement. #2664953
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Re: Pak-Saudi joint missile-nuclear agreement.

    Originally posted by Indian1973
    as the Shaheen2 thread is rapidly going south, I am posting it
    separately.


    Courtesy Lexis Nexis.

    Defense & Foreign Affairs’ Strategic Policy
    October, 2003

    SECTION: NUCLEAR STRATEGY; Pg. 4
    LENGTH: 2581 words

    HEADLINE: A New Nuclear Age; Pakistan’s Accord to Place Nuclear Weapons and Long-Range Missiles in Saudi Arabia Places European and Indian Targets Within Reach

    BYLINE: By Yossef Bodansky and Gregory R. Copley

    PAKISTAN HAS REACHED A secret but definitive agreement to station nuclear weapons on Saudi soil, fitted to a new generation of Chinese (PRC)-supplied long-range (4,000 to 5,000km) ballistic missiles which would be under Pakistani command, but clearly with some form of joint Saudi-Pakistani command and control.

    The new systems would be able to reach European and Indian targets, increasing Saudi political influence in Europe and giving Pakistan the strategic depth it needs to have a second-strike capability against Indian nuclear capabilities. This radically changes the balance of power in South Asia.

    Highly-reliable Defense & Foreign Affairs Daily sources in Islamabad and Riyadh reported on October 21, 2003, that Saudi Arabia’s effective ruler, Crown Prince and Deputy Prime Minister ‘Abdallah bin ‘Abd al-‘Aziz al Sa’ud, reached the agreement with Pakistan Pres. Pervez Musharraf and Pakistani Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali during the visit of the Saudi delegation to Pakistan October 18-20, 2003. The agreement is the culmination of a long and sustained series of Saudi requests to Pakistan. A significant, unreported one-on-one meeting between Pres. Musharraf and Crown Prince ‘Abdallah in Kuala Lumpur, at the Organization for Islamic Conference (OIC) on October 15, 2003, was also significant in the process.

    It was clearly the fact that the Saudi basing would give Pakistan the capability to credibly deter an Indian nuclear or conventional attack on Pakistan which was the decisive element for the Pakistani leadership. Pakistan’s domestically-based nuclear capability is insufficient to deter the threat even of an overwhelming Indian military thrust into the country. However, the basing of an IRBM capability, with nuclear weapons, in Saudi Arabia, adds a complex second-strike capability to Pakistan’s deterrence and bargaining power with India.

    Pakistani Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali arrived in Tehran on October 21, 2003, for a three-day visit, ostensibly about trade, but the Pakistani Government wished to use the visit to explain the Saudi-Pakistani deal with Iranian officials, in order to ensure that Iran did not see the new arrangement as a threat to Iran. Iran is conscious of the fact that the 1987 Saudi CSS-2 acquisition was specifically designed to deter Iranian attacks on Saudi Arabia.

    It was understood that, under the Saudi-Pakistani pact, the nuclear weapons deployed to Saudi Arabia would remain as Pakistani systems, and the new series of ballistic missiles — which would replace the existing Saudi CSS-2 missiles (2,800km+ range), provided by the PRC and based on the DF-3A — would be paid-for by Saudi Arabia while being marked as Pakistani systems. The new systems would have a range of at least 4,000km and possibly 5,000km.

    Saudi Arabia acquired its CSS-2s in 1987, principally to counter potential threats from Iran. The Saudi systems, which were obsolescent even then, were fitted with conventional warheads, although it was believed that Saudi Arabia had developed chemical and/or biological warhead capabilities for the missiles. The Royal Saudi Air Force (Al Quwwat al Jawwiya al Malakiya as Sa’udiya) operates a total of 50 CSS-2 IRBMs, in two squadrons; one at al-Joffer, the other at Sulayel (the principal missile base). The CSS-2 is a road-transportable, liquid-fueled IRBM, and can be launched from either permanent launch pads or from portable launch stands, although the RSAF approach appears to be to base the systems at fixed sites.

    It was understood that the new systems would replace the CSS-2s at al-Joffer and Sulayel. Ideally, according to the sources, the new systems would be solid-fuel missiles, although it was possible that a derivative of the DF-4 liquid-fueled system (4,750km range) could be obtained, surplus from PRC stocks as an interim measure. The DF-4 operates from fixed bases. No specific timetable was put on the proposed new deployment of Pakistani strategic systems in Saudi Arabia, but a DF-4 acquisition option could make the plan operational within a very short timeframe.

    In about February 2002, Saudi workers began a major expansion program at Sulayel. By early March 2002, there were significant numbers of new buildings and fortified storage facilities. New facilities were also built at the nearby King Khalid Military City, to support the Sulayel expansion. New launch pads were created and, significantly, new fortified storage facilities were built for missiles which would be longer than the CSS-2s currently in service. Two underground facilities were also noted.

    The implication of the Saudi-Pakistani deal is that it (a) gives Saudi Arabia more credibility and leverage in dealing with European states and the US; and (b) makes Saudi Arabia now a part of the threat matrix for India.

    It was no coincidence that, during the three-day Saudi visit to Pakistan, Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Sa’ud al-Faisal bin Abd al-Aziz Al-Sa’ud said in Islamabad on October 19, 2003, that Indian-Israel military co-operation was a “worrying element” which could unleash instability and an arms race in the region. Speaking at a joint news conference with Pakistani Foreign Minister Khurshid Mehmood Kasuri, he addressed the recently-concluded defense supply agreement in Delhi among India, Israel and Russia, Prince Sa’ud said: “Indeed what we are hearing of this cooperation (Indo-Israel deal) is that it is aimed not at the good of the region, but to inflame the region, to further add to the arms race in the region.” In the same context, he recalled how some Israeli think tanks demonstrated “similar sinister designs” in the Middle East concerning the “security of Israel”. He observed: “It is a country of four-million or so people that believes its security extends from the Indus River to the Atlantic Ocean.”

    THE SAUDI mission to Islamabad — the first at this level since the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the US — demonstrated the extent of concern which the Saudi leadership felt about the India-Israel strategic relations which had also blossomed since 2001.

    The Saudi Crown Prince held talks with Gen. Musharraf and Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Jamali, and Pakistani official sources said that the visit was as a result of an invitation delivered to the Crown Prince recently by Pres. Musharraf’s special envoy. However, Saudi sources said that the visit was as much a result of Saudi wishes as Pakistani. The visit also resulted in a complete harmony of expressed views on all common foreign policy issues — including whether Pakistan should, or should not, supply peace-keepers to Iraq [the consensus was to wait for an Iraqi invitation] — and a statement that Saudi economic aid to Pakistan would increase from $ 65-million to $ 100-million a year “as a token of its appreciation for Pakistan’s impressive economic performance over the last four years”.

    Crown Prince ‘Abdullah on October 19, 2003, visited an exhibition of defense equipment in Islamabad, and was accompanied by the Pakistani President and Prime Minister. The extensive display and demonstrations were not, according to Pakistani sources, just for show. There was a direct interest by Saudi Arabia in Pakistani-built systems.

    Significantly, however, there were now routine cooperative exercises underway between RSAF and Pakistan Air Force (PAF) units in joint asset protection — air defense — deployments. These, too, were not “routine”, and were, according to sources, aimed at developing joint capabilities to defend the proposed new strategic missile facilities in Saudi Arabia.

    Saudi-Pakistani nuclear weapons planning and cooperation has been underway for some years, but it had always been felt that Pakistani officials were resisting pressure from Riyadh to provide actual weapons to Saudi Arabia. [Even now, the formula addresses Saudi needs, but keeps the weapons in Pakistani hands, at least nominally and for some purposes.] However, the trail of events makes it clear that Saudi Arabia had consistently worked toward the acquisition of a nuclear capability, provided by Pakistan.

    On May 6-7, 1999, then-Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif escorted Saudi Minister of Defense & Aviation Prince Sultan bin ‘Abd al-Aziz al-Saud on a visit to Pakistani nuclear research facilities and the manufacturing facilities for the Ghauri liquid-fueled strategic ballistic missile (a derivative of the DPRK NoDong-1) in Kahuta. This was the first and only visit by a foreign dignitary to the facilities, and only the third by a Pakistani head-of-government. The host was Dr Abdul Qadir Khan, at that time regarded as the “father” of the Pakistani nuclear capability. Prince Sultan at this time was known to have engaged in what were described by sources as “very substantive” discussions with Pakistani officials for the acquisition of both nuclear weapons and Ghauri MRBMs.

    The Ghauri, with a range of only some 2,600km, was later to be by-passed, partly because of the range question; partly because it was liquid-fueled and not solid-fueled; and partly because of problems with the NoDong-1s being faced by its originator, the DPRK. Pakistani sources have said, however, that the Ghauri derivatives were likely to resume and were still viable.

    Prince Sultan’s visit to Pakistan was followed by a visit to Saudi Arabia in mid-September 2000 by a Pakistani strategic policy and nuclear delegation led by Dr Abdul Qadir Khan, Dr Ijaz Shafi Ghilani and Dr M. Younus But. They were guests of Prince Sultan, and at a speech on about September 20, 2000, Dr Abdul Qadir Khan thanked the Saudi Government for contributing to the success of the Pakistani nuclear weapons tests on May 28, 1998. That indicated a Saudi involvement in the Pakistani nuclear weapons program much earlier than Pakistani officials have generally acknowledged. [Saudi financial support for Pakistani nuclear research was, however, assumed even during the Zia ul-Haq era of the 1980s, but without any known understanding of a direct quid pro quo for Saudi Arabia.]

    On October 15, 2003, Pres. Musharraf met in Kuala Lumpur with Crown Prince ‘Abdallah at the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC). The meeting was not reported, and was a one-on-one affair. That night, Pres. Musharraf met with a number of Pakistani officials and Pakistani expatriates, including a number of scientists who had come especially to Kuala Lumpur from China. One Defense & Foreign Affairs source made notes of Pres. Musharraf’s remarks, which were not reported, and which were deemed to be private.

    The source, who made the notes available to Defense & Foreign Affairs, noted that the President said that he was encouraged and optimistic and that Pakistan was about to spread its wings on the world stage. He said that the world was looking for a role for Pakistan, and that it could contribute something which nobody else could. He said that Pakistan was at a crossroads and that it could decide whether it would accept this challenge for the ummah (Islamic world) and Islam.

    LMAO..i heard Sardar Jees and Sa’eedis were the biggest comedians in our part of the world…but nay, i was wrong..nothing beats lexis nexis or maxis dextist watever.

    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by Avinash
    If we take the logic of this article, then all the rockets in the US, Russian and UK inventory have evolved from the german V-2. Does that mean that the US, UK and Russia stole the rocket technology from Germany?

    lets just hope ppl remember that bfore they dis Pak missiles.

    ‘i avoided this thread but i think everyone knows what this thread is about… a lame attempt at riposte for the thread regarding Pak and KSA nuke/missile transfer.’

    Well ya thats the point..post lame stuff and you’ll get lame stuff.

    Could’nt get any simpler.

    I’m not here for flames or anything, thats why im not discussing the topic else i’ll be a flamer..a puki a this and a that bla bla.

    I’m out, all i want to say is dont post dreamy stuff and you wont get dreamy stuff.

    PEace.

    in reply to: FC-1 thread (news and pictures) #2664963
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Forget the exprt customers..there are going to be no exports until 2k10.

    Lets stick to the issue in hand..how fancy would be the stick in the cokcpit 😉

    phrozenflame
    Participant

    damn im jealous..now only if those Chinese 3d Artists can do some job on Fc-1..i’d be a happy man

    in reply to: An interesting question from PakistanDefense: #2664978
    phrozenflame
    Participant

    Originally posted by PLA
    Dear friends,

    Standard ideas are not part of the future… Berlin wall… Turky and Israel… But if India and Pakistan can get close then there will be first an oppertunity to work together before selling their only partly made plane to their oppenent. Bu tdo remember that FC1 will be released with tech and it is practically plug and play almost F16 derivative with BVR! And those remarks that it is nothing more then the Bison… Please.

    Cheers.

    heh forget AF, i’d be wiating for HLA by Reema and Aishwarya lol

    For the first time i think there are serious chances of long lasting peace..once the issues are over..its natural for Pak and India to become allies.

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 988 total)