dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,636 through 1,650 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-35 News, Multimedia & Discussion thread (2) #2261696
    MadRat
    Participant

    It wasn’t supposed to be less than a 1:1 without a qualitative enhancer in technology. That quality jump has happened. And you don’t get that quality jump with refits to older fighters.

    The wild card is unmanned programs.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2261811
    MadRat
    Participant

    How much of an improvement would adding 50 Kfir Blk60’s add to the IAF over the MiG-21’s needed to be retired? Seems more or less the Kfir Blk60 uses equipment that the IAF is receiving in Tejas Mk1. At $20 million apiece they get a lot of bang for the buck and move MiG-21’s out faster. When Tejas comes in sufficient numbers they place the Kfirs back on the market. The Kfirs may even make good transition aircraft from Hawks to Tejas.

    in reply to: Kfir Block 60 #2262423
    MadRat
    Participant

    Easily solve the imbalance by yanking the M53 and strapping the F110 in the tail as a counter weight.

    in reply to: J-20 Black Eagle – Part 6 #2265245
    MadRat
    Participant

    It looks like they stabbed the F-22 nose on a Rafale, kept with the intake layout they know in the JF-17, and opted for help from Sukhoi on the tail as the tail is very similar to the T-50.

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2265249
    MadRat
    Participant

    From the home of the ‘Roo down under

    http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/9/2/7/0854729.jpg

    in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2265266
    MadRat
    Participant

    The one equation you cannot argue is the per pound cost to move the aircraft as it is a linear growth in relationship to the mass.

    in reply to: Kfir Block 60 #2265351
    MadRat
    Participant

    Not really a threat to Gripen sales IMHO, because these do not reach the level of a Gripen in capability.

    They would basically make the FA-50 look overly expensive in comparison, but wouldn’t impact T-50 Golden Eagle sales.

    They do essentially match the JF-17 technology-wise and will be a fine way for western leaning countries to opt out of Chinese influence.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2265849
    MadRat
    Participant

    The whole point in 5th generation design is first look and automated sensor space-awareness. Quite frankly if they are aiming for just another homogenous Gripen NG then buy Gripen NG work share. The point of KFX is to replace the lighter end of their fleet, so there isn’t much need for a medium fighter in the class of Typhoon, Rafale, and Super Hornet. The need is to be different than Gripen NG and less than the size of the three mentioned above, so there isn’t anything wrong with an F1X0-powered fighter the size of a KF-16. Using a pair of lighter engines in the same thrust class would allow it to lower its overall height and give it a chance to make it home if an engine dies.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2267120
    MadRat
    Participant

    Instead of a guppy design I’d hope for a flattened shape with an internal bay for a pair of 500kg-class smart weapons at the minimum. All moving tails and rudders. Large low aspect ratio for the main wings. Emphasis on reducing overall height.

    Something more like a shrunken Sukhoi T-50 look with an A-37 type of side-by-side cockpit baseline. (The single seater then has major room for equipment.) Power it with a pair of smaller engines to push around 10 tons with a requirement to maintain flight under one engine at 65% mtow. Engine vendors provide at least engine twr of 9:1 at maximum wet thrust. Optimize stealth for the front hemisphere and low wide-spectrum IR emmisions on dry thrust.

    If utility is the goal then aim for Fast Pack-style interchangeable CFT’s that offer options between fuel, reconnaissance, and electronic warfare. Attachment points for ordnance on the fuel CFT’s. Modular designs are so fifth generation. The landing gear must not impede the Fast Packs.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2267411
    MadRat
    Participant

    The more I look at KFX the less thrilling the design appears. It’s going to miss features like all moving rudders, EODAS, integrated targeting pod, propriety GPS, internal bay, indigenous engine production, etc. It’s a boon for their heavy industry yet the product will be rather light on trends.

    in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2268231
    MadRat
    Participant

    http://www.defense-aerospace.com/base/util/148204_1.jpg

    It’s a good cleaned up look. The high gloss finish looks sharp. It would be realistic to see in Phillipines or Vietnamese service.

    http://defense-update.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/nellis_kfir.jpg

    From another angle.

    in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2268680
    MadRat
    Participant

    Swerve, the M88 advantage over the 9K50 was fuel consumption, acceleration, weight, response, and simplicity in maintenance. Pretty compelling reasons.

    in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2269155
    MadRat
    Participant

    If Dassault had kept a single-M88 powered Mirage F.1 option open for export they might have continued the Mirage success story. The M88 is a better engine than the 9K50 and the Mirage F.1 is substantially easier on the pocketbook. Even trying to move F-5BM upgrades to French radars, RWR, and missiles meant French jobs. (Yes, an M88 in the F-5 would be cool, too.) MICA didn’t have to be Mirage and Rafale exclusives.

    Really, the Dassault salespeople have nothing to show for results in the aviation industry. How such a big developer has few export sales I’ll never understand. If France ends up selling nothing to Brazil the French bureaucrats have a lot of explaining to do.

    in reply to: Boeing vs Eurofighter vs Lockheed for KFX #2269158
    MadRat
    Participant

    The Japanese engine would be interesting. If Japan could get the likes of India (AMCA), Brazil (FX-3) and Korea (KFX) on board, that would be solid customers to build orders with. It might be bigger than what Korea would settle to get, but either way they are going to spend a fortune on a non-American engine. I suppose reality is that by the time they build that large of jet they might as well go with F-35A.

    in reply to: Mig-31 as the ultimate fighter ? #2269603
    MadRat
    Participant

    http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/800x800q80/715/mig314f.jpg
    VersuS
    http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/f-15-35.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 1,636 through 1,650 (of 4,651 total)