dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2185559
    MadRat
    Participant

    Considering most of them use the same messaging protocol evolved from AIM-9, probably not so much. And MICA feasibility was already studied. MBDA once had ideas to push them out on non-French fighters. The high price made it untenable.

    https://thaimilitaryandasianregion.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/gripen-ng-3.jpg

    in reply to: Airbus: European Future Fighter Program #2185588
    MadRat
    Participant

    You cannot honestly say EJ200 is better than M88.3 when neither one implemented all the cutting edge techniques. The EJ200 is the better back end and materials technology. The M88.3 has the better front stages and goes a bit beyond the EJ200 with its extra bypass. Neither engine is a peer of F135 technology.

    in reply to: SAAB Gripen and Gripen NG thread #4 #2185741
    MadRat
    Participant

    Gripen NG can use AIM-9X, ASRAAM, MICA IR*, and Python V. It’s also able to use AIM-120C7, Meteor, Derby, and MICA*. Plus it’s able to use a wide variety of OTS standoff weapons. It might not be first day capable in an offensive campaign, but there is little doubt about it’s ability to deploy in the field and to provide defense in depth. It’s perfect for smaller air forces unable to afford $200 million designs.

    * = provided someone funds the adapter.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2127649
    MadRat
    Participant

    The solution to the T-45A obogs issue is a navalized Boeing T-X offshoot. You know you want it.

    in reply to: Reducing the 4.5 gens to almost stealth planes. #2138106
    MadRat
    Participant

    ASH price isn’t even competitive

    in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2149199
    MadRat
    Participant

    It’s not simply about efficiency when talking military vehicles. I’ve yet to see the military rush out to buy the Prius to replace a Humvee.

    in reply to: Helicopter News & Discussion #2149219
    MadRat
    Participant

    Can’t be too long before six engine hybrid helicopters built like drones replace traditional helicopters.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2149832
    MadRat
    Participant

    Export Su-35’s are called just Su-35 btw. Without S or K.

    Su-35 without the S is a whole different animal AFAIK.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2149889
    MadRat
    Participant

    Realize that the bid is cost of materials and labor rather than a traditional overall bid. The overall total price is pretty much the same for all parties involved, they only have wiggle room on getting costs of materials and labor down in order to improve profits. More or less the baseline contract is a crud pie that you swallow initially then try to upsell from there. Not much different than how the government was buying products during WW2.

    in reply to: USAF T-X #2150300
    MadRat
    Participant

    Something isn’t right how Northrop went silent on their design after withdrawing from the competition.

    I’m really surprised its been virtually zero information released. Boeing in sharp contrast is running a media circus.

    MadRat
    Participant

    Damn, people, quit being so thick. This is one of the few valid posts KGB has actually contributed around here… even if he misunderstood the signing was to demonstrate an intent and not a purchase.

    in reply to: Best 4.5 gen fighter #2170445
    MadRat
    Participant

    Pretty obvious the F-15K offshoots are better than anything else listed. MiG-31 is my pick for running counter-air sweeps. If the US or Israel actually used the F-15K offshoots without export handicapping I’d be sure to cite it instead.

    in reply to: Why is the J79 30% heavier than the R-25? #2172124
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’m thinking that they could significantly reduce overall size from several perspectives using a much lower volume engine. The original MiG-21 was around 13,000 lb st thrust wet and could push through Mach 2. Smaller engines can reach that thrust at far lower volume, weight, length, and width. And modern electronics would make them only about 400% more capable at 65% of the original’s weight.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2172270
    MadRat
    Participant

    except the strap band to hold what I suppose is an electrical wire…

    They call it aviation tape for good reason.

    in reply to: KF-X/IF-X & TF-X for Europe? #2173684
    MadRat
    Participant

    Looks like early T-10 layout
    https://i0.wp.com/su-27flanker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/images.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 4,651 total)