KFX isn’t meant to be a Porsche nor jack of all trades. That will keep costs down.
Sweden is being worn down by the free trade with the Far East like everyone else. Competition for resources, especially from predatory hoarders, is putting a squeeze on the bottom line. Its the same story everywhere, including in Russia. So what if Russian planes make mock runs, they have less of a threat than ever to attain their desired goals with such maneuvers. The biggest threat from Russia is the same it always has been, the regulars on the ground.
Where’s the F-14 TARPS loss over Lebanon.
F-16 is superb for its current role and can do everything necessary for its missions. The fact F-35 is so far along decreases the need for F-16 upgrades save for extension of the service life.
Oooooy. Mobile styles is, well, ghastly.
Where did it improve. The old layout had less wasted space and was easy to use on a phone.
MiG-25 in Algerian service. Its just not using its potential.
Nicolas nailed it on contrast topic. The old forum was tweaked optimally. Now its not. The new font doesn’t help matters either. The buttons got moved. Its not phone friendly now.
It should be able to make opportunity kills. Modern combat is akin to Silent Service, moving like a ninja looking for targets of opportunity. Dog fights puts the high tech warrior on the same level as the adversary, which is dangerous. What the F-22 is best at is not emitting, moving in and out of combat zones, taking quick shots, and making moves to keep hidden dangers off its six.
Tornado GR1 old school

Browse the web for Novi Avion
Or visit the Frankenplane thread
If you look at Su-15’s in the museums you will quickly notice the rough construction. I believe the airframes were meant for 2K hours, which the soviets were committed to burn compared to the conservative usage of MiG-25’s. A few things probably would have improved the Su-15 substantially as time progressed. Using streamlined stations for the main bomber-destroyer missiles. A high wing would have allowed easier stores management; drop tanks and smaller AAMs or rocketpods. Separation of the engines or sticking to one engine. An internal 23mm cannon.
If CUDA leaves the design stage then a 4x CUDA machine with a small AESA and single 30mm cannon could probably make it on the power of the newest F125. Imagine applying composites to the swingwing. If you’re looking for air-policing then I’d suggest a minimum of an F404-sized engine. The M88 is a high performer. The EJ200 would work. But we already have Gripen in this category.
Su-15 were flown in flights of multiples generally of 4, operating in pairs. KAL 400 wasn’t intercepted by one Su-15, no fewer than four tracked it and when they fired flares they used a pair of aircraft. The intercept was handed off from one group to another at least once in that incident.
If an F-4 is flying a mission its going to be pretty straight lined. The first pair of Su-15 would cut off that line and the second trailing pair would pounce on the turning target. But this isn’t much of a concern considering F-4’s are part of the self defense force and are not an offensive arm.
Wake me up when AKU-620 gets built and installed on an Su-35.