dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • MadRat
    Participant

    Better to sell them A-12 if we’re talking pie in the sky. Honestly, though, the UK would have been the only partners I’d wanted at the time for F-22A. F-117A was already past it’s pinnacle development-wise by ’95. We already knew JSF was the next big thing.

    in reply to: The 'JUST A NICE PIC…' thread #2203235
    MadRat
    Participant

    DCS is one impressive software. I have watched several of the better players on YouTube and am amazed how detailed it is.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2203236
    MadRat
    Participant

    63% for MKI is excellent. They’ve actually committed to MKI and India should be very proud of the turnaround. I fear they might over commit to the task to get it another level of improvement.

    in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2203440
    MadRat
    Participant

    S-37 aka Su-47 was a pariah after the wing flapping issue as speeds increased. Oscillating surfaces transmit energy throughout the rest of the plane and there was no cure. But it doesn’t mean a subsonic design wouldn’t have worked.

    in reply to: India MRCA Part Deux thread. Who will win? #2204238
    MadRat
    Participant

    Boeing proved they can quickly prototype fighters. Lockmart has no plans to expand F-16 sales. And there were plenty of ways to improve on the F-16 to make it relevant into the future. Boeing probably could have piggybacked off Saab for a Viggen II which would have been just a Gripen upscaled with an F100. Plenty of potential for their T-X design, too. The market has never favored heavies.

    in reply to: Official List of Aircraft Price thread #2204307
    MadRat
    Participant

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CxgtCfnXAAAfaXA.jpg

    in reply to: India MRCA Part Deux thread. Who will win? #2205150
    MadRat
    Participant

    F100 or F110 is the real guessing game. Surely they want F110-132 or F100-229 at F100-100 prices. General Electric is probably licking it’s chops over the prospect of 200 engines.

    in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2126854
    MadRat
    Participant

    One for an APU, the other for a radar.

    in reply to: How successful was the Su-47 Berkut? #2126985
    MadRat
    Participant

    Su-47 suffered wing flapping in the trans-sonic range. Obviously not going to outrun anything supersonic capable.

    in reply to: Jaguar M vs Entendard #2128330
    MadRat
    Participant

    France should have ordered A-4, modified it to their tastes, and dumped Super Etendard. Even Vought’s A-7 fit their ship better for long range strike. Super Etendard was built on an obsolete airframe using long in the tooth engines. A-4 had a pretty good combat record in comparison. If not for the Falklands fiasco against Exocet, I don’t think Super Etendard had a lot of remarkable performances.

    in reply to: RAF Buccaneer at Red Flag #2128729
    MadRat
    Participant

    That’s great information, cabbage!

    in reply to: RAF Buccaneer at Red Flag #2129084
    MadRat
    Participant

    Would be happy to read more 🙂

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2129321
    MadRat
    Participant

    Images like this used to incite major arguments before the internet
    https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/81/Soviet_Bomber.jpg/200px-Soviet_Bomber.jpg
    In hindsight they were simply to entertain.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2129322
    MadRat
    Participant

    Pretty apparent it’s aimed at operating over Taiwan not Honolulu

    in reply to: L-159 Alca #2129427
    MadRat
    Participant

    F404-102 right? F/A-18 uses F404-400.

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 4,651 total)