This post should be in the Missiles and Munitions category.
Some pics of the missile form and its nose sensor here:
http://freepages.military.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~otranto/fab/missil_piranha.htm
Anything new on this MAR-1 Piranha missile?
Nobody in the french government wants to impede development of their crown jewel. A deal on UAE’s terms will threaten that. Its about control of Rafales future.
That’s what you call a wet wing. It’s the latest thing in SAR.
The UAE wants Dassault to be responsible for certain upgrades while also sharing the technical details with UAE engineers. The unworkable part of the negotiations is because the UAE is pushing for transfers of IP that are not in the best interests of France.
With the ANG looking for jets I’m surprised leasing F3’s or T1’s wasn’t considered. Canada is another country that should have been looking at a lease. When your main role would be flying long distances intercepting planes over the ocean, something they do well, I see no reason not to play with the idea.
I liked the idea of a modern Skyraider spinoff that used a side-mounted cannon to reign down fire. The Skyraider was able to bare cargo, too, which made it multipurpose. It was simple, rugged, inexpensive compared to the jets, and could deliver milk.
There is a thread over at f16.net that includes Vietnam era pilots. They had interesting insights into what we need for a COIN aircraft. The A-37 was popular because of it’s lightweight size and cost, plus it was field serviceable.
It’s very difficult to hide the engine heat of a warbird whereas the turboprop planes can be hidden better. You also have to hide the heating from the propellers air friction and the airframe heating from the induced drag.
The newer planes usually have a pretty powerful engine for their size. The problem is they don’t have the raw torque of the older engines. You can always reduce prop noise by adding additional blades to the propeller. But then again adding blades means you need to add torque to turn them at equivalent thrust.
And then you have other issues that make it difficult, like establishing new supply lines for the fuel.
I was watching videos in flight. Big differences, yes.
More so from the various videos. There is quite a fan base posting video of it on YouTube right now.
The canards and rudders seem to be overly concerned with pitch control. Perhaps this machine is keyed for rolling maneuvers more than anything else.
Now if they’d move some of those Tranche 1 Typhoons to Canada where they’d be useful.
In all fairness the Tornado never got the EJ200 which was tentatively in the picture before budgets became constrained. The F3 would have been more competitive with the stronger engines. But in all fairness they didn’t need them for the intended mission.
I fail at communicado el espaniole, which is what the reports are in. I do not believe any money has traded hands yet.