dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,106 through 3,120 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Buddy Re-fuelling Stores on the F-35 B? #2398985
    MadRat
    Participant

    Only your dedicated tankers can fly across a hemisphere for a remote rendezvous to do the job, whereas if it had a strike package in tow its going to take several stepping stones of rendezvous points to move said strike package that distance. Each refueling takes from the kettle and you then need more assets to get the strike package moved. If you can fly the tankers across the ocean, meet up with the F-35B strike package, then send the strike package in from that point you’ve just cut the wear and tear on the land-based aircraft and reduced fuel costs dramatically. Refueling by tanker is certainly and option for F-35B.

    Remember, there is a certain amount of opportunity cost that goes into planning. If you had assets already available to do the job you wouldn’t use F-35B in the first place. And because the STOVL-only carriers are notoriously stocked low with strike ordnance, you wouldn’t use them for regular strikes. So this is more or less a one-time opportunity strike that requires some sort of stealth strike package to accomplish. Apparently it requires a strike package armed for self defense or a strategic bomber would get the call. And this assumes you need eyeballs on the target, otherwise a cruise missile would do the job… why the hell do we need F-35B for a strike package again?

    in reply to: Comparison F 15 E- SU 34 Fullback! #2398987
    MadRat
    Participant

    But here’s the catch! They test the TOR and Pantsyr against OTHER SAMS! That’s not some glide bomb, that’s a Mach 2+ flying object. And they practice firing at salvos. At last MAKS, it was 100% success.

    It’s not too difficult for them to fire at SAM-derived drones. It is misleading to call these drones as SAMs, considering they aren’t actively guided missiles that are aiming for the missile shot at them. (What’s the point of shooting SAMs at each other?) No, these are SAMs converted into decoys and equipped with new command modules and homing beacons. What would be interesting if they could hit these missiles without their special emitters to simulate larger aircraft. It’s like shooting fish in a barrel. The tests in this manner are to measure reliability, not about raw performance.

    in reply to: J-10B ready for PLAAF? #2399022
    MadRat
    Participant

    Not particularly stealthy, and not particularly better performing. Simpler. Cheaper.

    in reply to: L-29 over LHD-6??? #2034267
    MadRat
    Participant

    Its not a lack of caring by contractors that is a concern, its the neglect by the ‘paid professionals’ that has been going into the training that is the problem. We have turds struggling to keep afloat and the easiest way for them to do that is push the job off on someone else.

    in reply to: Blk 5 F-35 with ex load VS Blk 60 F-16 #2399388
    MadRat
    Participant

    pfcem,

    Once again you ignore the blatantly obvious. You have no idea what the magnitude is in the charts. The left side of the chart may be zero. I might be a large leap from zero. Without numbers in the charts the bars mean nothing.

    in reply to: Fantasy CVA01 fleet #2034287
    MadRat
    Participant

    Sea Slug was an excellent missile name. The “slug” sounds like it had good punch to it.

    in reply to: Buddy Re-fuelling Stores on the F-35 B? #2399465
    MadRat
    Participant

    They can still dump fuel with them attached, so its not like they have to land fully laden.

    in reply to: F-35 news thread II #2399469
    MadRat
    Participant

    Lighter weight might generally allow you to fly higher, but it doesn’t always let you fly faster.

    in reply to: Mirage III/5 in 2010 #2399473
    MadRat
    Participant

    I don’t believe they offered them up for export because they had sensitive electronics technology in them. Was it indigenous or was it from Israel? If it was imported in the time frame of development then it probably was breaking international law. I am pretty sure the Cheetah had bells & whistles the Kfir did not. Remember, the Kfir was meant to be economical. The Cheetah was meant to be a front line fighter.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2400326
    MadRat
    Participant

    Freshly overhauled, not new.
    MiG-29A are not in production since the early 90’s and they weren’t built in the Ukraine any way.
    Lviv is also the place where Kazahstan recently overhauled their Fulcrums too.

    What happened to all the exposed riveting? Must be a new skin that covers the roughness of its original construction and not just paint.

    in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2400328
    MadRat
    Participant

    Why are all the aircraft in the background mostly shades of yellow?

    in reply to: Blk 5 F-35 with ex load VS Blk 60 F-16 #2400362
    MadRat
    Participant

    pfcem,

    No metric on the chart then its worthless for comparison sake. Don’t try to convince anyone otherwise. Nobody is buying that argument.

    in reply to: Comparison F 15 E- SU 34 Fullback! #2400974
    MadRat
    Participant

    The war with Georgia would have been the perfect place to introduce the Su-34, but being its largely a paper tiger they used much older aircraft instead.

    in reply to: Fantasy CVA01 fleet #2034538
    MadRat
    Participant

    No Intrepid probably because it was converted into the Queen Elizabeth and equipped with a navalized fleet of Lear jets.

    /we can all have our fantasies!

    in reply to: Comparison F 15 E- SU 34 Fullback! #2401159
    MadRat
    Participant

    Paralay showed the hypersonic research project using a gutted Pheonix missile rebuilt fir research purposes. It’s an F-15B with a custom pylon attached. The F-15/Pheonix study was the F-15N-PHX which never made it past a mockup of the missile under an F-15A.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,106 through 3,120 (of 4,651 total)