dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,646 through 3,660 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2433686
    MadRat
    Participant

    Apparently they had a trade partner in the Middle East that supplied MiG-21bis and MiG-23 details as well as parts. The word on the street is that Egypt sold them a half dozen complete MiG-23 with their respective armaments in exchange for J-7’s to replace their aging fleet of MiG-21’s. The original MiG-23 transferred is still supposed to be on display in Beijing’s aviation museum.

    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2433706
    MadRat
    Participant

    The J8II and Su15 link is non-existence and is only made by those making superficial comparisons of the general shape. There has never been any shred of believable evidence linking the two, and the timeframe of their development makes it even more improbably since the USSR and PRC were effectively on a war footing with each other when these planes came out.

    The more I study the J-8I compared to the J-8II the more I see the similarities from one iteration to the next. The Su-15 seems to have influenced the rudder and main wings of the J-8I/II, but the J-8 (not J-8I) definitely is its own animal in that regard. The Su-15 doesn’t seem to have needed trailing strakes, but they were featured on the J-7 and Ye-152A. All in all the J-8I seems to be a marriage of Su-15 Flagon-A technology (main wing, radar, engines) with the J-7 more so than a simple clone of the Ye-152A. When they got to the J-8II its clear they cloned parts from the MiG-23 (air intakes, nose cone, radar, tail planes, gun) and MiG-21bis (engines), but seems to have continued to draw lessons from the Su-15 Flagon-C (rudder, antennas, primitive rwr). We know that later on in the mid-90’s it would get direct Russian assistance to add in weaponry from the MiG-29 and Su-27 programs. I agree its not a direct clone of the Su-15, but it definitely shared design elements from said aircraft; elements not found in the J-7 from which it supposedly was developed.

    in reply to: Hawk T2 Maiden Flight #2433895
    MadRat
    Participant

    Too bad it didn’t incorporate an afterburner. The wing supposedly was designed to handle supersonic flight.

    in reply to: Hawk T2 Maiden Flight #2433991
    MadRat
    Participant
    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2434324
    MadRat
    Participant

    Lot of people talk about the J-8II being influenced by the Su-15, but the J-8 to J-8II actually has the MiG-23 Influence. There is an entire gallery at CDF comparing the modification to the J-8II and the MiG-23.

    link? I’ll try google but a link would make me extremely happy 🙂

    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2434359
    MadRat
    Participant

    J8, thanks very much. Is that a heavily modified Mig19?

    The basic lines of the J-8II suggest a Sukhoi influence from the Su-15. However the air intakes look like dead ringers for those found on the MiG-23. It only vaguely resembles the Ye-152a that seems to be the basis for the Mig-21 derived J-8I.

    in reply to: Japanese Apache AH-64D #2434537
    MadRat
    Participant

    How comparable is AH-1Z to the AH-64D?

    in reply to: IR supressors #2434601
    MadRat
    Participant

    Don’t forget that they can dump a lot of heat using incoming fuel as a heat sink before it is burnt off. The propellers today don’t conduct the heat as well as they did when they were built from metal alloys, helping to eliminate them as a heat source.

    in reply to: BAe 146STA #2434619
    MadRat
    Participant

    I like the BAE-146M concept with Rolls Royce BR725’s and a high mount TP400 turboprop:

    in reply to: BAe 146STA #2434632
    MadRat
    Participant

    Not all military transports need ramps. Much military cargo is small stuff, a lot goes in standard cargo containers. Only large loads, such as vehicles, need a ramp, & they represent a minority of loads.

    An aircraft this size surely wouldn’t be used for major supply routes, where the delay in offloading due to not having an automated floor/ramp makes that much of difference. But in a pinch, God forbid we ever have another Berlin airlift moment, this type of plane would clog up the tarmac space.

    in reply to: Tornado F3's What to do with them? #2434864
    MadRat
    Participant

    Seems the Typhoon will have similar legs to the Tornadoes, so I can see why they want to move to the latter. But would a Meteor equipped Tornado force with similarly updated radars not be just as well for protecting the ocean surface around the island?

    in reply to: PLAAF; News and Photos volume 13 #2434877
    MadRat
    Participant

    Pretty tough for them to market fighters that take engines they still do a lousy job of supplying.

    in reply to: 36 Dassault Rafale for Brasil – Official #2434912
    MadRat
    Participant

    A combined Rafale and Gripen force would be awfully powerful compared to anything fielded by its neighbors.

    in reply to: IRAQ AIRFORCE NEWS (F-16 DEAL AND OTHERS) #2434914
    MadRat
    Participant

    Can you furnish actual Israeli programmes or experiences directed or related specifically to the Dassault Mirage F1?

    Swerve mentioned companies/nations that have actually assembled, operated or actively upgraded F-1’s…..

    Let’s be clear, the alternatives to Isreali help steer you towards strictly French parts, like the MICA missile for bvr. You also have to develop a supply chain of parts. The French solutions don’t translate well for a nation that will most likely evolve to use nato standard equipment. By the time you rip out all the old displays and equipment, then put in the overpriced French-derived kit, you may as well buy something that was better from the beginning. The Isrealis are more sensitive to these realities and can customize just about anyone’s hardware to work with your current jet for much less money. In effect they could make the F.1 an option.

    in reply to: Tornado F3's What to do with them? #2434923
    MadRat
    Participant

    F.3’s awesome range but mediocre dogfighting capability should be accounted for, sell/give to Canada to counter bombers with stand-off munitions, where there is no notti fighters nearby.

    I share the feeling. Canada (except for Quebec) should be guarded by an English fighter, what better than F.3’s? Quebec should be guarded by French fighters, like the Rafale or Mirage 2000. That would be so surreal.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,646 through 3,660 (of 4,651 total)