dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,811 through 3,825 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How good is the L159 compared to other trainers? #2481728
    MadRat
    Participant

    Only if human life is a consideration. The smaller engines have a shorter life and go kaput on more occasion. At least in theory the second engine usually gives one a ride home in those cases. At least when they actually put in a protective wall between the engines.

    The market really is overly saturated with options right now, especially second hand models for the smaller air forces. It makes the production a risky business. If you don’t sell the big iron then military designs just aren’t worth the price to research & design these days. Look at the modern Yakovlev company; they depend on light aircraft sales over military-grade sales these days. Even having a solid design like the Yak-130 is no guarantee of sales.

    in reply to: HAL upgraded Vietnamese MiG-21s? #2481754
    MadRat
    Participant

    Will it be any better afterward than with what the Romanians offer in their Lancer upgrades?

    MadRat
    Participant

    Conceptually flawed? Purely psychobabble talk! The Lightning rocked.

    in reply to: Stealth.. more useful for A2A or A2G? #2483297
    MadRat
    Participant

    Thing is unless the radar is shut down before launch the HARM can continue to update and refine the emitter’s location while in flight and be more accurate the longer it’s able to do that.

    It doesn’t really work like that. It has a command link that can relay better positional information, but otherwise its limited to the cached data and its best eyeball reference so to speak. They can fly automated, but they are most effective when a command link guides them in. Otherwise the older versions are flying basically line of sight to the target within the hard limits of their kinetic energy curve. Its not like they have air breathing engines to circle their quarry for bit, gander around the neighborhood, sniff the pee stains around the fences, say grace, and then finally after all that choose the most thorough spot for which to aim. They just aren’t that smart.

    in reply to: Stealth.. more useful for A2A or A2G? #2483784
    MadRat
    Participant

    Only problem is you’re only concerning yourself with one layer of the picture, dj, the gps module isn’t there solely for hitting coordinates gathered through sigint/triangulation. The harm is essentially becoming an extended-range gps guided bomb that may or may not be seeking out radar matrices. It will be pretty spectacular how flexible the package will be after the refit. Could finally give the government something to do with all those mark 36 rocket motors they’ve been storing all these years.

    MadRat
    Participant

    My heart says the Brits should have evolved the lightning rather than putting speys into phantoms…

    in reply to: Predict the winners! #2487829
    MadRat
    Participant

    Its pretty apparent F-35B is to be the Spanish replacement for the Harrier in their navy.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VII #2487863
    MadRat
    Participant

    Russia most likely will suffer some delays on the pak-fa program due to engine technologies. It would be ironic that the very same problem India has on their LCA program also stalls them getting a pak-fa version of a fighter.

    in reply to: Rafale News V #2487887
    MadRat
    Participant

    Except in DSI (n°15).:D

    Can you explain this comment? I assume you meant the diverterless supersonic inlet.

    in reply to: For Phantom II………. #2487916
    MadRat
    Participant

    Watch him get stationed out of some hick place like Little Rock (Jacksonville).

    in reply to: YF-23 pics. #2488300
    MadRat
    Participant

    raptor <> dinosaur

    Raptor == bird of prey

    in reply to: Is the F35 a waste of time? Part II #2489030
    MadRat
    Participant

    Yes, no nation would be stupid enough to attack USA, and America will only attack a country they easily can defeat.

    That is absurd. Please refrain from the attacks on the integrity of the American people. We just removed a whole culture from power as a result of their completely renegade behavior on the national scene. The American people expect their leaders to hold a higher morale standard and the elections proved that exact point.

    The F-35 program is a money pit that is going to produce a decent aircraft. Its a shame that it has had to be so costly for what is going to be delivered. Even if its everything promised it still doesn’t justify the costs involved up to this point.

    in reply to: What could possibly need 41,000 feet of landing strip? #2489077
    MadRat
    Participant

    sferrin-

    Where you show the X-24C it looks more like an underground parking garage with a guard booth in the center of the ramped entrance.

    in reply to: which design had more potential #2491342
    MadRat
    Participant

    the Su-47 looks like it would have a crappy payload. I don’t think it is capable of having heavy external stores on those kinds of wings.

    It was meant to house the weapons internally and not on the wings. If anything it was meant for air superiority, which is where it would have excelled in the technology arena of its day. Probably suffered from being too pigeon holed into a single role when competing fighter designs were moving towards all purpose roles.

    in reply to: MiG-23 useless ? #2491346
    MadRat
    Participant

    The Mirage F.1 in contrast, which had similar time scope and was subject to similar technological limitations, came out much better. The Russians didn’t lack the technology or the ability, but specified the wrong aircraft for any but their own (perceived) needs.

    The MiG-23PD was sort of a cross between the powerful engine of a MiG-25, the delta wings of the MiG-21, and the lift jets of the Yak-38. This low chord fixed wing creature was not particularly successful in the maneuver arena due to its added weight from lift jets. But how can something lugging around dead weight like that hope to be maneuverable? Perhaps if they’d opted for more wing area and no lift jets – which would have made it a non-stol fighter – they might have had something a little more utilitarian. But since stol was so important to the requirement, its no wonder they chose the swing wing.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,811 through 3,825 (of 4,651 total)