dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,501 through 4,515 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: F-22 tech vs F-35 tech #2510217
    MadRat
    Participant

    The TVC’s on the F-22 are geared more as an infrared suppressor than vc. Round nozzles don’t suppress as well as a shape with sharp corners.

    MadRat
    Participant

    Just figure they are aiming for towed target rigs that emit an infrared signature that is similar to a jet plume. Its unlikely they got to shoot at something real. They can blow up things in the simulators for much less cost. But combat simulators don’t give the same look and feel of the real deal, so I can only imagine live firings (usually with non-armed warheads you have to figure) allow the pilots better opportunity to see, hear, and feel what its like to carry out a mission from beginning to end.

    I still light off amusements on independence day even though I’ve seen the same fireworks over and over the past thirty years. Even though they probably are built the same, explode the same, and look the exact same over these years I just never seem know what to expect when that fuse is burning.

    in reply to: Russia's MiG-31's #2511142
    MadRat
    Participant

    I wouldn’t doubt the export of MiG-31B/BS to any corner of the world would destabilize the surrounding continent. I don’t feel the Su-30MKI is even in the same class. The MiG-31 can – like its predecessor – slash attack and retreat in ways that cannot be countered with lesser craft. The MiG-25P proved omnipotent when used in these tactics.

    MadRat
    Participant

    haha, no but are they tracking the same IR signature? or can the pilots and their missles pick out the target they want?

    Yes. Why not?

    in reply to: How effective will it be (typhoon)? #2519268
    MadRat
    Participant

    2:1 until Meteor arrival.

    in reply to: What will be a classic in the future? #2520891
    MadRat
    Participant

    Is the F-117 really Sidewinder capable? I think in a Tom Clancy story it uses its Sidewinder to down AWACS or something like that, but I didnt give it much credibility. 🙂
    Regardless, the F-117 certainly a classic.

    I’ve only seen claims it was tested as was the Maverick, but none of the claims come with details. If it had agm-88 compatibility then it had pretty much everything it needed for aim-9, because to do first one you have what it takes to do the latter. Its not always true in reverse.

    in reply to: What will be a classic in the future? #2522189
    MadRat
    Participant

    If the F-117 was able to show off its Aim-9 compatibility in real combat I’d vote for it.

    in reply to: What will be a classic in the future? #2523324
    MadRat
    Participant

    Its nice we have MiG-23MLD here to explain in great detail and obsfucate everyone. It really provides a crystal clear picture for the rest of us to appreciate.

    crobato-

    I’m pretty sure high AoA was not such a problem with the F-15, especially from the F-15C forward. The lerx is a low tech way of achieving what the F-15’s complicated air intake was designed. The real key of the F-15’s arrival was its brutish turning ability that was itself eclipsed by the F-16 and pretty much every air superiority and light fighter since. Few modern aircraft still match the F-15 in raw altitude performance, certainly not any of the light fighters, and the ones that do are even more specialized.

    As for Harpoons and Maverick, the F-15 wasn’t tasked with those for a reason. It was much cheaper and more effective logistically to put them on the true maritime and ground support aircraft, respectively. Its only after the dawn of the multi-role fighter that one would even consider it on an F-15, which both options are available on today’s F-15E if the consumer wants it integrated in. The F-15 was really only an air superiority fighter up until the F-15E.

    in reply to: First, It Was Arnold. Now, It's Bruce's Turn!? #2524037
    MadRat
    Participant

    Su-22M# – Can’t remember the name

    The Triple XXX sequel?

    in reply to: S-400 How to defeat the new Russian ADF System? #2524038
    MadRat
    Participant

    SAM kill and SAM test are two different animals, true, but the technology has been successfully proven on accidnet with the S-200 over the Black Sea out to a range almost equal to the Talos kill of the MiG-21. What was it, 200 innocent passengers dead?

    in reply to: What will be a classic in the future? #2524040
    MadRat
    Participant

    I cannot agree that the F-15 systems didn’t need upgrades. They do. F-16s upgrade more frequently and that is partly because they have a much larger installed base around the world, hence they face more diverse national requirements. Today, the air superiority only F-15C isn’t that much useful either, considering that since the sixties, the greatest threat to aircraft has been SAMs, and SAMs have killed more combat aircraft in the last four decades than air to air combat. The great majority of missions being run by airpower is directed against the ground or surface. Molded by modern and export requirements, something like the Slam Eagle is also a very different animal from the F-15A.

    First off, the F-15 has undergone plenty of refinements so its not possible to say it didn’t need them. Secondly, the F-15C is very useful because it dictated the need for aircraft to account for them. They’d rather tangle with the Mirages and F-16’s of the world than the F-15C’s. And they’d much rather face SAMs than any airborne defense. By your same logic you may as well take it one step further and point out that air defense guns have down more aircraft than interceptors, fighters, and SAM’s. It is because the latter are given far more opportunity than the aforementioned. Isreal showed Syria what happens when you ignore air superiority and try to maintain an air campaign. Hell, even both Iran and Iraq willingly suffered the same short-sidednesses due to their bravado-minded leaderships.

    in reply to: India's New Small Fighter Bet #2525830
    MadRat
    Participant

    If Tejas used the same engine as the F-18E/F would India be more inclined to use the latter?

    in reply to: What will be a classic in the future? #2525833
    MadRat
    Participant

    As for AA, I have not really seen how the F-15 can be better than the F-16A to D in exercises. In fact, once AMRAAMs are factored in, it seems to matter even less.

    Any AAM can be evaded with the right battlespace management. The F-15 will dominate the F-16 unless the latter enjoys superior battlespace management. Why? Because the F-15 will have the better eyes and intangibles like range and speed that the F-16 cannot match. Any pilot that foolishly gives up their intangibles will be beat, true, but one-on-one the F-15 should be able to win more than a 2:1 advantage. And with the F-16 Block 60’s now in the price range 80% of the F-15E, even a 1.5:1 advantage is more than significant. This is why the F-15 will always be the big dog compared to its little pup sibling, making a comparison really pointless. IMO both are going to be classics on their own merits.

    in reply to: What will be a classic in the future? #2525922
    MadRat
    Participant

    The lightweight maffia has been around for a long, long time, and just can’t be crushed. The Tejas and J-10 are definately offspring from this line of thought, and by no means ‘new’. Even more so, for embryonic national industries, there simply are less risks involved in developing a satisfactory lightweight then there are in a weight-ain’t-an-issue-let’s-get-ambitious project like the F-111 or F-22/F-23 were, for example.

    LWF programs are cost worthy for less-than-top performers. If you aren’t king of the hill then why waste your money on fewer inferior types? You want to maximize the number of airframes in the air. You would see the F-22’s become ineffective if they faced 15:1 to 20:1 numbers against inferior opponents that could sustain enough airframes to overwhelm the F-22 airbases. They have much less of a threat for their money if the numbers drop to 4:1 or 5:1 numbers. This is why I think the Chinese are going for short-term leaps in logistical improvements for their air force versus huge leaps in expensive technologies they cannot afford.

    The future is swarms of inexpensive, stealth, lightweight air-superiority capable drones that double as bomb trollies. Once they gain air superiority then they can lug external loads over the enemy.

    in reply to: Rafale news #2531843
    MadRat
    Participant

    Using today’s Rafale technology that is currently fielded, could one hope to end overflights of the old MiG-25R?

Viewing 15 posts - 4,501 through 4,515 (of 4,651 total)