dark light

MadRat

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 4,651 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2136873
    MadRat
    Participant

    The plane is virtually on deathrow anyhow. They’ll never have more than 21 from recent reports.

    Su-57 was squeezed for all the nationalistic propaganda it could muster. The reality is that its premise is proving to be costly and inefficient.

    You will see a revival of a more compact stealth design than the Su-57 that is less costly.

    in reply to: Shenyang J-8II vs Sukhoi Su-15TM #2139901
    MadRat
    Participant

    We had this debate about a decade ago. Search the archives.

    in reply to: US Adversary/Red Air contracts #2140939
    MadRat
    Participant

    Or I described HiMAT…

    in reply to: US Adversary/Red Air contracts #2141036
    MadRat
    Participant

    I still lean heavily to a drone flown by instructors using some kind of cockpit emulation. There is no reason a 65 year old expert – that couldn’t possibly handle 9 G’s on a regular basis – should need to enter a live cockpit to demonstrate advanced skills, strategies, and tactics. We retire guys with mountains of experience way too early.

    Some kind of over-powered canard-equipped flying delta wing (with a saw-tooth trailing edge) drone with an adjustable radar reflector would be dandy. Single engine. Give it tri-paddle option to mimic 4th generation TVR-equipped fighters. Single engine. Maybe give it ability to avoid collisions with other aircraft so it helps minimize potential accidents. Minimal wave drag because it shouldn’t need anything resembling a cockpit.

    in reply to: US Adversary/Red Air contracts #2141449
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’m surprised they couldn’t use instructor guided drones with radar reflector-enhancement to simulate a fair spectrum of threats. Would be interesting to see what a skunkworks program could come up with.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2142920
    MadRat
    Participant

    If you’re worried about cost of a home in America you live in the wrong place, because you chose where to live. And our highway system and low gasoline/deisel prices make it rather negligible to drive 45 minutes to an hour to commute to work. In more urbanized areas you might commute 90 or more if you want a cheaper home. The only problem is self imposed. The F-35 is a 50 states wide jobs program. The industrial base is immune to anything save for cataclysmic interruptions. Most importantly, because the subcontracting is farmed out with minimal input from 3rd parties, the parts are solely built off serialized spec sheets without revealing information to the provider other than parts numbers and critical design specifications, its practically impossible for anyone but the actual design house to use political cronyism. And because it would be so costly as a winning bidder on the main contract to get caught up in politics, it becomes a solely results driven venture. Small minds cannot grasp these big picture goals.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2142937
    MadRat
    Participant

    Actually the subcontractors that build the tiniest parts have no clue what their contribution to the project does. They are just making parts to match design specs. The key is the tight control of the specs. You’re actually improving your fundamental manufacturing base with this strategy, not wasting it.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2142958
    MadRat
    Participant

    Lean manufacturing refers more so to modern builds with just-in-time (jit) delivery of mostly assembled sectional parts from external contractors. The contractors are responsible for assembling a competent team of subcontractors to assemble their contracted sections. The main assembly area can be more flexibly located and relocated in short time. The subcontract work itself is dispersed. Its much less vulnerable to hijacking, because multiple competitive vendors supply each lower rung in the food chain. Welcome to Lockmart 1991.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2143197
    MadRat
    Participant

    CGI

    MadRat
    Participant

    The XB-70 trumps Concorde and Vulcan.

    SR-71 trumps XB-70.

    in reply to: Ridicilous trolling or real? #2144988
    MadRat
    Participant

    Man hours even in Stalinist Soviet Union were not infinite. I cannot imagine the reload time. And think how vulnerable you’d be with trying to line up on targets.

    in reply to: Forum moderation and improvement #2146053
    MadRat
    Participant

    I’m much more turned off by the lack of pictures in this thread, rather than the content of the opinions.

    in reply to: Forum moderation and improvement #2146344
    MadRat
    Participant

    Mpacha has been about the only moderator I ever see here. He’s been absolutely consistent.

    It was always nice when SOC was still around. He kept threads on track.

    I’m not sure I agree on the proposed moderators because your list. The berkut guy would never be my choice. I think someone like Mercurius would be a candidate. I’d nominate Trident, too. And although we’ve had unintentional disagreements in the past, Spudman has consistency where I’d defer to his judgment toning down threads, too.

    Guys like Gerard, Alpha Bravo, and Tango III are notorious for being clear and precise without distinctive diatribe.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2147225
    MadRat
    Participant

    More like LCA-N naval Tejas with twin engines. Maybe India is onboard secretly, which would explain lukewarm attitude with PAKFA involvement.

    in reply to: Was the F-15 the best choice for Japan? #2147629
    MadRat
    Participant

    You realize that radar technology significantly expanded in the 80s? Cruise missiles were a significant driving force. And of course there was BS’ing. There were far more little white lies circulating than truths. The lies tended to disappear quickly. But the point about F-20A being difficult to see on radar persisted for a decade. I remember the claim substantiated first when reading about it in Air Force magazine and later I believe it was Pop-Sci, then seeing it elsewhere. There were a lot of sentiment for F-20A for whatever reasons. It came up as a reason in a long newspaper story regarding the F-16 and F-20A competition. Those were different times, being a much larger proportion of society was involved in the military during the Cold War.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 4,651 total)