dark light

rickusn

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 163 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061406
    rickusn
    Participant

    Actually Edisonone you are the one who started with the gratutitous insults.

    While at the same time making outlandish false statements .

    When asked for any factual documentation to back those statements up your the one who got angry and still are.

    Dont dish if you cant take would be my advice.

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061473
    rickusn
    Participant

    “Early retirement” at the age of 74.

    LOL you get goofier and goofier by the second. LOL

    And you still have not answered any questions. LOL

    Ive seen losers in my day but you have just went to the head of the list. LOL

    in reply to: Horizon vs. F100 #2061477
    rickusn
    Participant

    As promised a response from Richard B:

    “Hi Rick

    For years there has been reports that the T45’s will carry only Aster 30, but it’s never been confirmed. The necessary detail about the two UK Aster orders so far placed is not in the public domain – i.e. we don’t know if they are only for Aster 30 missiles or whether some shorter range [and cheaper] Aster 15’s are in there as well. However we do know that the T45’s will initially have 48 Sylver A50 cells suitable for both Aster 15 and 30 (indeed DCN recently issued pics of the first UK modules being completed), with volume allowed for another 24 cells if the requirement emerged in the future.

    The bottom line is that the T45’s will be able to carry a mix of Aster 15 and 30 as required – if the missiles are available.

    Regards

    Richard”

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061546
    rickusn
    Participant

    “You’ve got to be kiddin’??? Or else – you must be equally as ignorant
    as the other guy.”

    The only ignorant person here is you.

    You can prove your not by answering my questions.

    Which you havent, cant and wont.

    “Socialism with a uinque and distinct characteristic, shall we say — a characteristic where
    Dan Rathers gets to anchor for life maybe instead of being disgraced ???”

    LOL “anchor for life” What world do you live in?

    Do you realize people in America with his type of money(and many with much less) often begin retiring in their mid 50’s? And almost everyone is retired by the age of 65.

    And the rest of it is too laughable to even comment on.

    “He (Rathers) got canned for the air national guard thingy
    and, likely for having interviewed Heussein the dictator and for showing empathy
    for the guy. The Hanoi Jane syndrome… Oh you know what I mean!!!”

    I dont think anyone in the universe including you knows what you mean.

    Show proof of your contentions and Ill be persuaded.

    Ignorant? Take a look in a mirror for the definition. LOL

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061674
    rickusn
    Participant

    Edisonone:

    “One word: “Obssesion”. And a full
    40 footer container load of it. And it’s gonna take you
    a while to get it fully unloaded I see.

    Do you know something else? Me and a bunch of Gringos (term used
    in full respect of course) was grilling the river guide and the Captain about the
    politics of the PRC, and openly, freely and liberally, the shiphands, guide inclusive were making
    open statements, criticisms even, about the faults, the mistakes, the stupidities
    of Mao and not a gesture of fear or concern in their body language.

    Now, try that with Bush and see if maybe you might not join
    Dan Rathers in the unemployment line up . I have every respect for Bush too cousre
    so don’t get me wrong. I even asked my people to vote for him.”

    What in the world are you babbling about? LOL

    If your trying to say that there has been a change of government in China and that it is no longer a Communist government you will have to supply me with factual documentation.

    If your trying to say US citizens arent “making
    open statements, criticisms even, about the faults, the mistakes, the stupidities…
    and not a gesture of fear or concern in their body language. ” your even goofier than I thought.

    Dan Rather standing in an unemployment line? LOL

    Ive got news for you Multi-Millionaires dont stand in ANY line. Period. LOL

    Dan Rather will be 75 years old this year and retired a year ago.

    He did have problems using fake documents but thats a whole other story.

    Again I ask what in the heck are you babbling about? LOL

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061756
    rickusn
    Participant

    You tell me? LOL You seem to know evereything else.

    But if you dont think the communist party is still governing China you may need to check your glasses.

    But I dont expect it. LOL

    Happy Crash LOL

    Unfortunately Ive never made it to China. But know some who have and recently. They seem to think your way off out in left field somewhere.

    in reply to: China to build 3 Aircraft Carriers #2061758
    rickusn
    Participant

    China is still run by the communist elite. Make no mistake.

    They are desperately holding onto power. How long they will be able to is very speculative.

    Their removal from power would leave a huge vacuum to be filled by who knows how many different factions including foreigners.

    It also could spark a civil war the likes of which the world has never seen.

    But remaining in power becomes problematic for the communists if they cannot manage the economic and social change that has started and will escalate. This to could precipitate a civil war.

    The China Story is on the verge of surpplanting the Ameican Story at what cost remains to be seen.

    The US could well become a 2nd rate power in the next 10 years or so.

    Many think it is already.

    Another vaccuum this time worldwide could well be created at what cost again is very speculative.

    Will China implode?

    Will the US implode?

    We live in interesting times do we not?

    in reply to: Horizon vs. F100 #2062239
    rickusn
    Participant

    “So, I try to write a rank of radar:

    1-SAMPSON (T45)
    2-EMPAR (Horizon)
    3-AEGIS (F100)

    Do u think is correct?”

    Dunno.

    But they should be better at tracking seaskimming missles and/or aircraft to being higher up..

    Its a step up not to have separate illuminators if they are similar to APAR.

    Downsides from what little I understand for EMPAR/SAMPSON:

    Arent yet in-service and therefore no track record for comparison.

    Dont give continuous 360 degree coverage in “real time”.

    Are “rotators” therefore a mechanical failure is a disaster.

    Also a hit on one of the four faces of SPY-1 will normally not knock out the whole system but on the Horizon/Type 45 its big trouble from one hit.

    Of course I standby to be corrected.

    in reply to: Horizon vs. F100 #2062251
    rickusn
    Participant

    “I did not state that they will have 72, just that they can have 72.”

    Not necessarilly. Just because it looks like there is enough room doesnt mean they “can”.

    Nor does it mean they cannot.

    Until I see some engineering analysis I will have to stay with probably not.

    BTW IMHO they are fine ships but like all warships compromises have been made.

    Thanks again . Rick

    in reply to: Horizon vs. F100 #2062327
    rickusn
    Participant

    “although this has never been claimed and internally the space may be used for access, services and other purposes.”

    The above makes my point. Its pure speculation. Not fact.

    Fact is none of those building will have more than 48 cells so anyone stating that they will have 72 is being disingenuous.

    But I did miss that passage.

    Thanks. Rick

    in reply to: Horizon vs. F100 #2062364
    rickusn
    Participant

    “I remember reading it in the UK publication Warships IFR-but of course it may be my mind playing tricks on me.
    The T-45 having space for 72 Sylver A-70 cells in an accepted fact-look at the navy matters website.”

    Maybe its an accepted fact. But facts usually have supporting evidence. A picture doesnt make the nut.

    But Ive seen it nowhere in print that the RN has or has plans to increase the # of Sylver cells. Nor have I seen it in print that they would only carry the ASTER 30.

    Including Richards site, to which Ive contributed, to which I referred first but not only.

    If Im mistaken please enlighten.

    PS Ive E-mailed Richard when I hear from him I will post the response.

    Thanks. Rick.

    in reply to: Horizon vs. F100 #2062444
    rickusn
    Participant

    “As far as I am aware the MoD has not ordered the ASTER-15 as of yet and the speculation is that the T-45s will only carry the Aster-30. Either way the T-45 has space for 72 Aster-30 carrying VLS cells…”

    Any confirming sources for these contentions? I cant seem to find any.

    Thanks. Rick

    in reply to: France to donate 2 TCDs to Argentina #2064087
    rickusn
    Participant

    The Ouragan and Orage will arrive Buenos Aires in March of 2006.

    One will be in service with the other to serve as a source of spare parts.

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2065060
    rickusn
    Participant

    Must be time for the USN to disband. LOL

    in reply to: Russian Navy : News & Discussion #2601117
    rickusn
    Participant

    Must be time for the USN to disband. LOL

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 163 total)