dark light

WJ244

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,167 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Catalina – G-BLSC/VR-BPS/VP-BPS Cut Up #969991
    WJ244
    Participant

    I am amazed and very sad to hear of the demise of this Cat. It does seem unbelievable that she wasn’t saved. I have never seen any mention on a forum or in any of the aircraft mags of her being up for diposal. I must admit I wasn’t even aware that she had been moved and assumed she was still under long term rebuild.
    The most likely scenario does seem to be that the airport wanted to recover their parking fees as quickly and simply as possible so they called in the scrappie.
    As others have posted here she was probably worth far more as a restoration project than she was as scrap so the airport didn’t even maximise their return on the disposal. It does seem that the problem was that the airport either didn’t know how to contact interested parties or didn’t bother to try.
    As Bruce said this should be a wake up call to all involved in vintage aviation. There is no way I could have afforded to save her but I would gladly have made a small contribution to a fund to acquire her and, as we proved with the HS748 collection, a lot of small contributions can deliver the required results.

    in reply to: Shuttleworth Solidarity Thread #972508
    WJ244
    Participant

    I took my late father to Old Warden for his first visit in the early 80’s and from that day onwards, assuming the weather was OK, it was impossible to keep him away from a Shuttleworth display. Both my parents loved the place and, for me there isn’t another place that holds a candle to Old Warden.
    Unfortunately my circumstances mean I can no longer make several visits each year so I can’t give the support that I used to but I do try and manage at least one Shuttleworth display every year. It is a truly magical place with a superb collection of aircraft.
    They have had a very difficult start to the year and no one could have envisaged the tragedy that happened this weekend. My sympathies are with Trevor’s family and all at Old Warden and I sincerely hope that the rest of the year is accident free and that the weather is much kinder on display days.

    in reply to: Is it me or do we need more warbird only airshows? #973835
    WJ244
    Participant

    My warbird (first registered in 1944) only likes airshows featuring aircraft with pointy noses and flames out the back whereas I prefer my aeroplanes with a big fan on the front.
    I think that the public generally prefer mixed shows and it would be very hard for another warbird show to compete with Legends.

    in reply to: Old Warden Crash #973846
    WJ244
    Participant

    Awful news and particularly sad as I am sure I had the pleasure of being flown by Trevor in the Shuttleworth Tiger when I won a draw some years ago.
    RIP Trevor and thank you for the pleasure you have given everyone who has seen you display at Old Warden. A special thought for his family, friends and all at Old Warden at this terrible sad time.

    in reply to: Airbase Museum moving to Newquay:BBC #975053
    WJ244
    Participant

    I can understand that the cost of fixed overheads such as rent and rates and the problems with redevelopment at Coventry mean that there is a need to relocate.
    I can also appreciate that there must be financial incentives available which make a move to a commercially depressed area attractive but as others have said there is likely to be little in the way of visitors in Cornwall other than in the fairly short holiday season and I also wonder just how many holidaymakers are likely to put their hand in their pocket for a trip in a classic aeroplane. Most people I know who have no interest in aviation regard old aeroplanes as dangerous and would never dream of taking a flight in one even if it were offered for free and certainly wouldn’t pay for the privelege. It is also worth remembering that a large part of the holiday trade in the West Country is made up of families and I have my doubts that many families are likely to have enough spare spending money for the whole family to take a flight and, certainly in my family, either the whole family got a holiday treat or none of us.
    I have long dreamed of a trip to Coventry to take a flight in one of the Airbase fleet but, through no fault of my own my take home pay has dropped by 25% in the last 10 years which means I can barely afford an airshow and 2 or 3 other fairly local aviation events a year so the trip to Coventry has never happened.Sadly a trip to Newquay for a flight is even less likely simply due to the distance involved and I suspect the same applies to many other enthusiasts.
    I always thought that one of the atrractions of belonging to the Classic Aircraft Club was that you could visit Airbase and see where your money was being spent and feel that you were part of a movement to keep classic aircraft flying. There is nothing like seeing work being undertaken on the aeroplanes which you are helping (in a small way) to keep flying to encourage enthusiasts to keep parting with their cash. A great idea and fairly easy to sell to enthusiasts when the aircraft are in an area which is reasonably accessible and within a viable distance of a good proportion of enthusiasts but not such an easy concept to sell when visits involve a trek to one end of the country.
    It is a shame that an alternative site with access to a runway and everything else that Airbase needs can’t be found in the Midlands at a viable cost.
    I completely understand the reasons behind the move and want to see the collection survive and flourish but, on a personal note, it is disappointing because I stand very little chance of ever managing to visit and while, in the short term, there are obvious financial advantages in moving to the West Country I suspect that, in the long term, somewhere more central would be a better option.
    Time will tell.

    in reply to: Sea Fury VX281 #989922
    WJ244
    Participant

    A Beverley Centaurus?! So was it with that combination that they were ‘talking’ about attempting to break the world speed record for piston engined aircraft at the time? Rob

    Darren I apologise I think it was you and not Old Fart who flew in WJ288.
    I had forgotten that BAR were using an ex-Beverley Centaurus for the proposed air speed record attempt and I think that was what was installed when I last saw her at Duxford. I don’t know about the condition of the ex- Beverley engine but the original Centaurus that was fitted when she was at Southend was well and truly seized and as far as I am aware none of the cowlings ever came off during her time at the Southend museum. I know they even remained in place when she was resprayed for the museum opening as I helped rub down and mask her and was given the job of spraying under the wings as the sprayer reckoned I was younger and fitter then him and if I messed it up it wouldn’t show too much.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #991938
    WJ244
    Participant

    Could have had a kick from a petulant tennis professional!

    in reply to: Sea Fury VX281 #991941
    WJ244
    Participant

    G-SALY/WJ288 was an FB11. It was the first acquisition by the British Historic Aircraft Museum when founded by Tony Osborne at Biggin Hill and was subsequently moved to Southend by road. After BHAM folded she was acquired by Historic Aircraft Museum Southend and was displayed in the museum hangar.
    She was sold at the museum auction to British Air Reserve at Lympne who registered her as G-SALY. I last saw her at Duxford in the early 80’s with no prop and possibly no engine under the cowling either.
    She is now in the USA with the Commerative Air Force (nearly got that one wrong!) and flies with a Wright up front and an extended canopy with a jump seat.
    Forum member Old Fart has flown in her recently and said that they had the original Centaurus engine in the hangar. The Centaurus was already seized solid when HAM acquired her so the chances of a successful engine rebuild would have been minimal.

    in reply to: B-17 at Biggin Hill #993881
    WJ244
    Participant

    So the country gained nothing in revenue and the public gained no static airframe to view as a reminder of what it had gone through

    That sums up the situation pretty well. I can’t remember the exact figure but it seems to ring a bell that Ray mentioned that customs wanted something like £250+ in duty – a lot of money in the 60’s particularly for a recently established museum that was run on a shoestring.
    Don’t forget that in those days the preservation movement had barely started and few understood the desire to preserve old aeroplanes. It was also a comparatively short time after the war had ended and many chose to forget the horrors and deprivation brought about by the war and the last thing they would have wanted to see was a B-17 – not only a reminder of the war but also a reminder of the American Air Force whose presence wasn’t exactly welcomed with open arms by some sections of the population.
    I got the impression from Ray that, for valuation purposes, Customs viewed it as an airworthy aircraft and duty was calculated accordingly. They weren’t interested in the fact that the prospective owner had neither the intention or funds to fly it. I would imagine that much the same applies today for valuation purposes.
    We should also remember that things have moved on a long way and in those days it was very much a case of if a government dept quoted a figure that was what you paid. Negotiations just weren’t an option and the chances of getting your local MP to contest the customs charge on an aeroplane that they would probably view as an old crock were almost nil.
    It was a sad loss to the preservation world but it is to his credit that Peter Thomas did at least make an attempt to save the B-17 and it was a lack of foresight by a goverment dept that thwarted his efforts – a familiar story?

    in reply to: B-17 at Biggin Hill #994037
    WJ244
    Participant

    Several years ago I met Ray Thomas who told me that the B-17 was offered to his father for the Skyfame Museum but HM Customs intervened and said that import duty would have to be paid if the aircraft was to become a permanent import for the museum but no duty was payable if it was broken up.
    Skyfame couldn’t afford to pay the duty so the B-17 was scrapped but I can’t confirm where this happened. It seems unlikely that they refitted the control surfaces just to fly it to Manston for scrapping.

    in reply to: Moth Club Charity Flying cancelled (Old Warden) #1002053
    WJ244
    Participant

    Thanks for posting this. I had originally hoped to go for a flight but couldn’t afford it so had contemplated going anyway to take photos. Thankfully your post saved me the petrol costs for a 200 mile round trip and I can put that towards a Shuttleworth display later in the year.

    in reply to: Restoration enquiry #1007722
    WJ244
    Participant

    As has been said before the total originality of parts (and “originality” in this sense is very difficult to define) is impossible on an airworthy aircraft.
    A recently completed and flown early Spitifre restoration started life as a wreck rescued from the sea near Calais. I have no idea how many original parts were used in the restoration but I am sure they would have used whatever was possible without compromising safety. What is clear is that the airframe was restored as near as possible to the condition of the aeroplane when it first left the factory even down to a hand pump for the undercarriage and the result is a very beautiful airworthy early Spitfire which we all have the pleasure of seeing in the air.
    As recovered the wreck wouldn’t have been recognisable to anyone other than an ardent enthusiast and was of limited value as a museum piece.
    In the case of the desert P-40 I would love to see it fly but it is a time capsule and it is more appropriate to preserve it much as found maybe with the broken perspex replaced.
    There are first world war reproductions being built in New Zealand some of which use modern reverse engineered copies of the original engines. Again they are truly beautiful and look, sound and fly exactly like an original would have done during the first world war. I have no problem with the fact that they are reproductions and we should count ourselves lucky that someone has put up the money to have them built.
    In my view the percentage of origianl parts in a flyer is largely irrelevant (except possibly to a future buyer of the aircraft) so if it looks sounds and flies like the original when it is in the air then that is what matters.
    A final thought. The Shuttleworth Collection Avro Triplane and Bristol Boxkite are replicas. I believe the Avro has a reasonably period engine but not the Boxkite. Both fly and look pretty much like an original and the replicas are now getting on for 50 years old anyway so they have in effect become historic airframes in their own right and continue to give pleasure to all who see them fly.
    Your question is a can of worms opened many times before and there is no definitive answer. You just have to go with what you personally feel makes you happy.

    in reply to: 7 Chipmunks #1009228
    WJ244
    Participant

    Thanks for that – I wasn’t aware that Art Scholl had owned more than one Chipmunk.
    When I was 13 or so I used to go to our local radio control flying field and the odd copy of Aeromodeller used to come my way. Art Scholl’s Chipmunk and Harold Krier’s Great Lakes were often featured but unfortunately I never got to see displays by these legends of the aerobatic scene.

    in reply to: 7 Chipmunks #1010019
    WJ244
    Participant

    I think it was G-ATTS was fitted with a Rover gas turbine way back in the 60’s and more recently there was a Bonner Chipmunk (G-ARWB) which appeared at Farnborough with an engine based on the block of the Rover V8.
    There was also Super Chipmunk G-IDDY built by Nigel Brendish of Harvest Air which I think had a Lycoming. Apparently visitors and staff at the Southend Museum got regular close ups of G-IDDY as Nigel beat up the museum building at every opportunity until Southend tower decided enough was enough and had words with him.
    I am pretty sure Art Scholl’s famous Super Chipmunk was also Lycoming powered and still survives (in the Smithsonian?).
    I am unsure of the fate of G-ATTS but I think G-ARWB is still around and I am pretty sure G-IDDY went to the USA probably after Nigel’s sad and needless death in a Cessna.

    in reply to: Spitfire decals – MJ730 #1020397
    WJ244
    Participant

    If you are not happy about applying letraset direct to the model or handpainting straight on to it just buy some clear decal film. You can apply letraset, hand paint or even use ink on the clear decal film. Apply a couple of coats of lacquer to seal it all in and when it is thoroughtly dry cut out and use like a waterslide transfer. Some of the suppliers on Ebay even sell decal film and a suitable spray of lacquer as a complete kit and it doesn’t cost the earth.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,167 total)