dark light

Meddle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 1,933 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #240663
    Meddle
    Participant

    Rather more than “a few more pennies” I would suggest.

    The cost of living would go up in an independant Scotland. Scotland has an obesity problem. Problem one solves problem two, no?

    in reply to: General Discussion #240184
    Meddle
    Participant

    I thought this would be about waking up and finding your flag looking like this:

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231782[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: General Discussion #240193
    Meddle
    Participant

    The plastic must have run when they incinerated her, that’s all I can say…

    Well the good news is that she would love this sort of schtick!

    in reply to: General Discussion #240199
    Meddle
    Participant

    Before or after she died…?

    I would have thought the now was explicit enough. :stupid:

    in reply to: General Discussion #240203
    Meddle
    Participant

    And this could be the face on the new Scottish Currency
    :eagerness:

    http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/1/590x/Scotland_Independence_Duchess_of_Alba-460698.jpg

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/460698/House-of-Stuart-s-Duchess-of-Alba-could-be-next-Queen-of-Scotland-after-independence-vote

    I’m all for calling it the Scottish Groat, Sgroat has such a ring to it…….

    She looks like Joan Rivers… Now

    in reply to: General Discussion #239978
    Meddle
    Participant

    As for English Mp’s voting for English matters only, define English matters, any one matter voted through on an English parliament will have a cost involved and that will effect the whole of the Countrie(s) not just one.

    Simply put, an English matter would be one that Scotland already has devolved powers over; health and social issues, agriculture, environment. A Scottish MP, in Westminster, could vociferously vote for a rise in English prescription fees knowing full well that he wouldn’t have to pay them back home.

    Anyhoo – in general I think its a pity – I now expect the political classes to relax back into their opulent ways and treat the majority of the populace like sh_t. They could have done with the kick up the backside (well, to be honest, they are long past the kick up the backside stage, probably needing a good dig on the jaw at this stage).

    Were they ever too worried? The tinfoil hatters are already suggesting R. Murdoch got that YouGov poll into the papers to make them scrabble a bit. Other than that I can’t see it. Ed Miliband came to one of the nastiest shopping centres in Edinburgh (wrecking ball to move in in the next few years apparently) and had some nasty stuff shouted at him. Cameron did his shirtsleeves act and mentioned ‘effing Tories’. It would appear it all settled down again after that.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239996
    Meddle
    Participant

    Well, the truth was probably that an independent Scotland could never have seriously ‘defended’ the territory that it governed; how much that would have mattered these days, who knows?

    I was thinking of oil fields that span both Scottish and Norwegian waters, and also the capacity for other countries to put down drilling rigs in ‘our’ water. From personal experience I can say that maritime geography can get slightly nebulous when it comes to categorically defining the location of something in open water, as you run into projection and datum issues fairly quickly.

    in reply to: General Discussion #240004
    Meddle
    Participant

    Oil revenue is all good and well, but I was wondering how an Indy Scotland was going to defend that corner of the realm. Also, it sat rather unpleasantly with the greener Scotland we were being promised. Banking on a dwindling dirty fuel source, when Scotland repeatedly trips up over renewables (the £17 million research wind turbine on Orkney that lead to naught, the mothballing of the turbine factory on the Mull of Kintyre and the demise of the Proven brand of farm-scale wind turbines springs to mind) made me somewhat nervous.

    in reply to: General Discussion #240012
    Meddle
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231794[/ATTACH]

    D’awwwwwww.

    I do not think Salmond was the man to bring Scotland to independence. As a Scot, I did find his paucity of solid facts rather troubling, though it is easy to say that he was/is the best orator in Scottish politics by quite some margin. However, this time it was a one man show and I think the Yes/SNP/Indy camp will realise this once the dust settles. With such a strong turnout they can hardly claim malpractice.

    I’m interested to hear what English forum users here think of the idea of English devolution. To my mind it seems like a logical conclusion as it rids you of problems such as the West Lothian question. I personally see no reason why us Scots should be able to freely meddle in English-only matters.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239901
    Meddle
    Participant

    One has only got to look at the world in general to note that at the cause of most conflicts (if it isn’t religion) are Nationalism, territorial disputes and tribalism and at the heart of these are often egotistical individuals with narrow horizons.

    Nationalism, territorial disputes and tribalism are at the heart of the vintage warbird movement. :highly_amused:

    in reply to: General Discussion #239504
    Meddle
    Participant

    Excellent news, after all it’s simply a revenue generating tool, if the cars were a problem they should be removed, not simply fined and left.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27952341

    I’m not a car owner, but this is good news. I get especially annoyed when this sort of practice is peddled as having an environmental benefit.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239505
    Meddle
    Participant

    At least the SNP is sticking with fish to lead them!;)

    Help us all.

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]231863[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: General Discussion #239509
    Meddle
    Participant

    What’s all this to do with the Scottish Referendum:confused:

    I dare say Salmond has shown his true colour by choosing to quit on the spot. Whilst hardly surprising, if he really had the interests of us Scots at heart then he would be sticking out his term. Perhaps history shows this is always the case, I’m not knowledgeable in this regard. I really do not look forward to having Sturgeon as our next leader. Again, Salmond was the only good orator in that party, whilst Sturgeon squawks out smug platitudes and hyperbole with neither wit nor sophistication. I was lucky enough to catch her on Daily Politics failing to answer any questions whilst giving it the duh, its obvious rhetoric.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239207
    Meddle
    Participant

    For the record I don’t think there is a god. Quite why this means I have to belong to a group of individuals beats me. The way I see it, I am better at some things than others. I am quite a good musician, whereas I know people who are tone deaf. I know people who are deeply spiritual, but I myself find I struggle to even imagine what that must feel like. I don’t think I need to ever congregate with other spiritually-lacking individuals expressly to bitch about those that find solace in organised religion, but perhaps that is just me.

    I think that politics will change over time, and that atheist leaders will be accepted in the fairly near future. I’m more surprised that people value Blair’s supposed faith, though he did tone (geddit?) it down a bit whilst in power.

    in reply to: General Discussion #239042
    Meddle
    Participant

    Beats me! Perhaps a case of sore loser, but the conspiracy theories are already circling. I think the poster saw the loudly vocal minority of Yes voters as being reflective of the general voting intentions of the Scottish public.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 1,933 total)