Speaking as a millennial, the roundel is totally lost on me. I also have a distrust of anything that is designed to appeal to millennials, or rather I have a distrust of things that boomers and Gen X-ers think millennials might happen to like. This roundel is a perfect example. To my millennial eyes it looks like the logo for somer sort of open source software package or IT company. If you walk around Edinburgh’s New Town you find Georgian town houses split up by floor, and one floor will be occupied by an IT development company. From the street you see a buzzer and an obscure logo like the RAF 100 roundel!
In my opinion the regular RAF roundel is iconic enough as it is.
The roundel looks hastily sprayed on. It appears to be asymmetric, and a darker top layer has flaked off in parts. Why would it be used as a decoy? I can almost imagine the roundels were painted on downed aircraft either as wry humour or as a morale boost? “This is one of ours now!”
If jaded, bitter ramblings pass as humour to you then perhaps it is yourself who has succumbed to an unhappy state of sorts. I don’t really understand the constant delusional belief, generally among elderly men on the Internet, that anybody who doesn’t find jaded, bitter ramblings amusing must somehow be do-gooding or trying to control ‘the rest of us’.
To put it another way, my partner went shopping for a new dress a couple of weeks ago. She was served by a ~18 year old girl, who was eager to help, and who was indeed helpful. Only the girl was totally indiscrete, and by the end of it my partner had heard all about her eating disorder, her battle to control her weight and her various other trials and tribulations. My partner did not need to know any of that, even if the girl was helpful.
I’m not offended, I simply fail to see the point. There is a false dichotomy at play here; you don’t simply fall into the camp of entertained or offended when it comes to the bitter, irreverent nonsense espoused in this “diary”. There is better written and more entertaining material online already, and if I wanted to hear the pointless mutterings of geriatric men I would head to my nearest flat-roof pub.
Speaking of which, starting a paragraph with “I was in the pub the other night…” goes beyond the realm of parody, apparently without any glimmer of self awareness. This reads like a 3rd rate standup routine.
Ultimately I’m seeing this as the pointless rantings of somebody who needs a personal blog, rather than dilute and pollute the value of the Bluebird project with badly written analogies about cooking curries, calendars or foxes. Writing screeds of antagonistically worded text, then getting offended when people are antagonised, is odd and unprofessional behaviour. It sounds like trolling to me. I’m happy to discuss any and all sides of fox hunting, for example. I went to agricultural college, so I understand the arguments in favour of managing their numbers, the need to preserve rural traditions and the anger farmers feel when they are dictated to from on high by ‘townies’. However, what does this have to do with resurrecting a dead speedboat?
Learn from Gerald Ratner, and stop soiling your own nest.
I too have had a similar thought to AnthonyG, in that the damage can’t simply be contained to the wing alone. It looks like the cherry picker sustains some damage. In the video it also looks like there is some wire briefly caught up in the prop after the impact, possibly from a fence, which is then released again (0:20 to 0:23 in the second video posted above). The prop also seems to kick up dirt, so presumably it sustained damage and thus the engine will need a strip down too?
In the video I don’t see the Yak veer to the right, simply it isn’t landing exactly parallel to the paved runway.
It is a shame to see it go. You get a good look at 12/30 from any train heading North to Dalmeny. I thought that they used the runway very occasionally when work was being carried out on the main runway. Usually I hear about it when people at work who live out that way start complaining about loud aircraft.
The original buildings of RAF Turnhouse have been disappearing over the last few years. In fact, when I visited the Malta air museum last year the Scottish couple (mid 40s, at a guess) were asking each other if they knew where RAF Turnhouse was. Clearly the connection between it and EDI has been largely lost.
There seems to be a rich history of aircraft apparently residing in reservoirs in the central belt!
Attempting to stitch together yards of corroded geodesic sounds like a challenge. From memory there is a chunk of one sitting in the deep stores at East Fortune, and small geodesic sections occasionally wash up along the Moray coast after storms. There is probably a lot of constituent Wellington material out there, but I imagine reconstructing it all would be akin to trying to piece together a smashed honeycomb. As such there might be more of a compelling argument for building a new one from scratch?
Very sad to hear of this. Hopefully a speedy recovery for the pilot.
I was slightly disappointed to see, in some quarters, the rabid haste at which aviation fans were posting information in a bid to be ‘first!’ and to demonstrate they had knowledge before the press etc. Distasteful behavior!
Klan Airways? You need to provide a bit more context here! The reverse swastika on the tail is quite an interesting addition.
It looks like you found a good distraction from the rugby! :applause:
Impressive work! Are you permitted to plug the pub on here? Do you have photos of his other creations?
I’m watching an engine run of WR963 right now on Facebook ‘Live’. All four appear to be turning!
I’ve seen such ‘grow bags’ disparaged in some quarters, the notion being that they are a tad Walter Mitty when worn by GA pilots, but they are a lot better than a trip to the burns unit.
Red Bull Super Star, anybody?