dark light

Meddle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,933 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Strathallan Aviation Museum #805405
    Meddle
    Participant

    Kermit has posted photos of the Lancaster on Facebook, in part due to requests from interested followers. Facebook makes it maddeningly difficult to hotlink to their photographs, probably quite deliberately. If you carry out a search for “Kermit Weeks Lancaster” with the Facebook search function you get various images of the lorry backs he keeps the remains stored in, engines and wheels.

    If you search too far, however, you find a post by one Kermit Lancaster talking about Bachelor Week. The power of AI…

    In one post from 2015 he refers to his “Lancaster project”, which makes me quietly optimistic that something is happening with it. Either way I’m glad it is stored out of the elements, rather than dumped outside as it was, post-Woodford, at North Weald.

    in reply to: Strathallan Aviation Museum #806470
    Meddle
    Participant

    Having grown up near Stirling I’m a bit gutted that I’m a whisker too young to have ever visited this museum, as it was both local and impressive. My partner’s father has spoken of going to an air display there and seeing a Shackleton beating up the runway.

    From memory, their Comet and MR1 Shackleton were scrapped on site but everything else was saved. The Reid and Sigrist Desford recently resurfaced at Spanhoe, having been stored in pieces at Snibston Discovery Park. The Comet cockpit was saved and is now in Dubai, and the Shackleton cockpit lives on as well.

    The Lancaster was KB976, and was returned to WW2 specs at Strathallan having been flown over from Alberta. It was moved to Woodford with the plan being to return her to the air, but alas the airframe was crushed when the roof collapsed. A section of fueslage is at Aeroventure, and other bits ended up in Australia (I think). Kermit Weeks has a good quantity of KB976 in storage.

    I think (I could be quite wrong) that some smaller biplane is still stored at Strathallan that was part of the museum’s inventory.

    in reply to: Original Anderson Air Raid Shelter For Sale #807934
    Meddle
    Participant

    One can never be too careful!

    in reply to: Original Anderson Air Raid Shelter For Sale #807957
    Meddle
    Participant

    Excellent! I’ll see if the seller will accept my £3.60 offer and deliver it to Edinburgh.

    in reply to: Original Anderson Air Raid Shelter For Sale #808036
    Meddle
    Participant

    My archaeologist buddy was convinced that the small mound in the back garden of his tenement flat was the remains of an Anderson shelter. I’m sure I’ve seen that sort of chunky corrugated material recycled in allotments and gardens.

    Perhaps a daft question, but was asbestos incorporated into the material? That grey/white colour makes me wonder.

    in reply to: Whatever happen to… #808976
    Meddle
    Participant

    Sad to see it go, and saddened that I never got to see this (or any other) Hunter display. At the same time I’m not too surprised, unfortunately.

    As for the charged text above, “I knew how easy she was to operate and couldn’t fathom why nobody serious came forward, not even to ask how I managed to operate a Jet warbird at a profit and could they do the same with her” just seems a bit naive. I’m not exactly too surprised that there wasn’t a lot of interest in operating a Hunter on the civil register!

    in reply to: Ethiopian Canberras #810537
    Meddle
    Participant

    I’ve had a look at Debre Zeit/Bishoftu air base on Google Maps aerial imagery, and I’m not seeing any Canberras. Lots of defunct propliners and fastjets (maybe F5s?), and lots of stuff dumped outside in general. Nothing Canberra-shaped.

    in reply to: Please identify this plane #810966
    Meddle
    Participant

    The only plausible motivation, that I can think of, for a faker to mock up the aircraft would be to deter industrial espionage. Not for nothing did the Bell XP-59A sport a bogus propeller;

    https://airandspace.si.edu/sites/default/files/styles/callout_half/public/images/stories/XP-59-fakepropeller.jpg

    Our aircraft might have sported false panels or fitments during ground trials, alongside the ‘innocent’ racing scheme rather than a military one?

    Again I’m just thinking aloud.

    in reply to: General Discussion #224653
    Meddle
    Participant

    UFOs are exactly what they say on the tin: unidentified! If a BA Captain can’t identify what they see then they saw a UFO by default. It doesn’t have to be anything exotic; it is really only the conspiracy theorists and the overly impressionable that scrabble for the most outlandish explanations. I’m always surprised that 1950s – 1980s UFO ‘contactees’ are reasonably well known, and were given media coverage back in the day. They also snapped clear, lucid photographs of UFOs using only primitive technology.

    George Adamski:

    http://forgetomori.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/adamski.jpg

    Paul Villa:

    http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/80/590x/ufo-1-680711.jpg

    Billy Meier:

    http://www.theyfly.com/photos/images/f0829.jpg

    None of these photographs stand up to any sort of scrutiny, but these hoaxers were granted book deals, media appearances, interviews galore. Part of me wonders if these guys were unwittingly (or otherwise) exploiting a sort of pervasive Cold War paranoia that gripped the era. The threat was out there, and it was coming to mess with us in shiny chrome spacecraft. I consider if it no coincidence that the appearance of these flying saucers has aged badly; they look exactly like what the future looked like in the ’60s and ’70s, with their domes and chromed fairings.

    In an era where most people carry a good-enough quality camera in their pockets, in the form of smart phones, it is odd that nobody is photographing UFOs with such a level of detail and lucidity in 2017. The number of people with access to photographic equipment has increased exponentially, and not just in the West.

    in reply to: Please identify this plane #811184
    Meddle
    Participant

    Adhesive explains the two additional areas with the same edging.

    in reply to: Please identify this plane #811233
    Meddle
    Participant

    Perhaps the rear of the photograph holds some clues?

    https://i.imgur.com/h9cKA8s.jpg

    Flipped, cropped and desaturated:

    https://i.imgur.com/1fuhFao.jpg

    The left hand stamp seems to say:

    ??????ERO
    BC157
    ????RCIA
    (Murcia?)

    The stamp (?) fragment at the top right clearly says CAN… Canary Islands (Las Islas Canarias, surely?) or Canada?!?!

    A link to the sale of the photograph is found in post #11, as John Boyle points out. The description of the photo, from the site, is:

    PHOTO POSTAL FORMAT. SPANISH MILITARY PLANE. CIVIL WAR OR POST-GUARD.

    Photography format of a Spanish Military Airplane, I do not know the model and the numbering is blurred. Size 8.5 x 13.5 centimeters. The photograph is not very clear. It is preserved as seen in the photographs.

    Google Chrome has bungled the translation a bit, but there isn’t really a lot of information present. I can’t find other items being sold by a specific seller, so I’m a bit puzzled by OP’s claim that “The seller has a group of photos of aircrafts of the spanish air force capted in 08-1941 at San Javier AB as stated almost in one reverse.” That seems like oddly specific information, unless OP had private correspondence with the seller. It seems like the seller(s) on that website simply sell old photographs. Maybe they cruise estate sale and junk shops, or simply knock on doors in small Spanish villages and pay a nominal sum for old photos? Who knows, but there doesn’t seem to be a personal link between the seller(s) and the photographs. For example there are photos of Spanish soldiers who are not identified in any way. Some of these photos look quite private/personal and were clearly sent to people. Some are hand annotated. None of this gives me any reason to believe, necessarily, that the photograph at the top of this thread was taken at San Javier in August 1941. It is an old photograph of an aircraft, which is part of a sale of other old photographs of aircraft. None of the other photos seem similar to our photograph here.

    Meddle
    Participant

    A supper guppy sounds quite good, but then again I only had a small dinner.

    in reply to: Please identify this plane #811694
    Meddle
    Participant

    I’m still surprised that this aircraft is sporting a scheme so similar to one worn by the Nakajima Ki-27 at one point in turn, albeit minus the big round circles! I missed the point in the discussion where it was agreed upon that the photograph was definitely taken in Spain. What was the clincher? I thought it looked more like an image from a Pacific island, though I have almost nothing to go on (sand and palm trees aren’t unique to Pacific islands after all). Are we taking the information reported with the sale of the photo at face value?

    A few thoughts. 1) Is the cockpit open in the photo? 2) Are we looking at exhaust ports or writing/artwork on the side?

    I tried to mess around with the keystone and contrast of the image to chase out the writing on the underside of the port wing. I don’t like it! It looks too dark and defined, if somewhat blobby, for the general lighting balance of the image; like the characters had been applied somehow with an overly inky stamp. Does this hint at image manipulation? Some of the geometries of the aircraft seem to be causing confusion in this thread.

    Silly season: are we looking at a real aircraft? Are we looking at something knocked up for a film, or potentially some sort of model? We also don’t know that it ever flew. It seems to be an unusual mix of pre-war and WW2-era design concepts thrown into a single design.

    in reply to: B-36 Peacemakers in the UK #814483
    Meddle
    Participant

    I’ve updated my post accordingly.

    in reply to: General Discussion #224904
    Meddle
    Participant

    Without wishing to sound too flippant, a lot of these conspiracy theorists simply suffer from paranoid delusions and other mental illness. Youtube is generally bad news as it confirms that these people exist, aren’t getting the help they need and generally walk among us.

Viewing 15 posts - 331 through 345 (of 1,933 total)