dark light

Meddle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 1,933 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #229957
    Meddle
    Participant

    CHECK YOUR FRIDGE

    Yup, still there!

    in reply to: Second flying Sturmovik – Russia #810075
    Meddle
    Participant

    My issue stems merely from the fact that there seems to be a perpetual ‘never happy’ brigade. I’m of the camp that would rather see a historic aircraft flying in an inaccurate paint scheme than see one in a wholly accurate scheme relegated to the back corner of a dimly lit museum somewhere. In an ideal world every historic aircraft would be flying in the correct scheme, but that is the fairly small cherry on the top of a complex and relatively rarely baked cake. The fantasist in me wishes that VTTS painted 558 in anti-flash white, with a black radome, for the last year of flying. That would have, in my opinion, looked better than the high-gloss all over camo scheme. However the difference is that 558 flew, howled and inspired thousands. There are static and (nominally) ground-running Vulcans with better paint schemes out there, but they inspire a tenth of the number of people.

    In fairness I’m irked by the scheme NH904 (G-FIRE) wears in the US:

    http://www.aviationmuseum.eu/World/North_America/USA/California/Palm_Springs/Palm_Springs/Spitfire_NH904.JPG

    in reply to: Second flying Sturmovik – Russia #810336
    Meddle
    Participant

    So an aircraft has been recovered from a lake bed in 2012, and returned to flying condition by June 2017…. and you lot are complaining about the paint? :highly_amused: You couldn’t make this up.

    Anyway, the message appears to be that the warbird scene is healthier in Russia than it is here.

    in reply to: Sea Vixen wheels up landing #810555
    Meddle
    Participant

    Will museums generally be up for supplying parts from their airframes?

    in reply to: Sea Vixen wheels up landing #810730
    Meddle
    Participant

    Yes, you are missing the detailed information about the state of this item and engineering experience on the Sea Vixen to enable you to form such a judgement, which is most unhelpful.

    Very thoughtful and generous of you to put Mark back on the right track with your immense knowledge of Sea Vixen engineering, rather than simply bashing him for asking an honest question. Top marks! :applause:

    Remind me of the purpose of discussion forums?

    Anyway, I’m calling it early: The Sea Vixen will never fly again. By the time it is returned to flying condition there will be even more fallout from the Shoreham crash, and it will be viewed as too great a liability. I already predicted (correctly) that there would be no ferry flight for 558 to “Brunty”, and that the plan to keep 558 safely stored indoors in perpetuity could not be assured… watch this space!

    in reply to: Long Marston Days Numbered #814326
    Meddle
    Participant

    There seems to be a delicate balance at play here. On the one hand I’ve heard every few months over the last few years that Long Marston is going to disappear under houses. On the other hand I’ve heard that something positive is going to be done with the Shackleton imminently; also every six months or so, over the last few years.

    I’m not surprised the Shackleton hasn’t moved anywhere. It seems like the worst combination of a sizable and expensive to shift airframe and an incomplete, vandalised airframe.

    in reply to: Serious Spitfire crash in France. #814327
    Meddle
    Participant

    I think its quite impressive that the public are willing to help recover the pilot. All those people helping, in this day and age over here if that type of thing hapened everyone would just get their phones out and video it!

    Just in case you missed it the first time:

    http://i1339.photobucket.com/albums/o720/Alanko/Spitfirecrash_zpsys4tcrdd.jpg

    This guy is very much not helping the pilot to get out, and takes photographs the second the clods of soil cease falling from the sky.

    in reply to: Serious Spitfire crash in France. #815622
    Meddle
    Participant
    in reply to: Aviation-related garden ornament, as seen in London? #815651
    Meddle
    Participant

    That sounds likely, as I don’t think the scene was ever recreated for any other purpose. The pig was also used for some live performances. There are a few stories of how and why Pink Floyd’s pig broke free, most of which I think are fairly apocryphal. Pink Floyd’s drummer Nick Mason states that a police helicopter had to carefully chaperone it, but that eventually the pig came down in a field belonging to a farmer in Kent, who then phoned the band (how did he have their number?), which is ultimately how they learned of its fate. I’ve read variously that the marksman was having tea, bunking off or was simply only hired for the first day of photography and the pig broke free on day two or three. I’ve also read and heard that the pig disrupted Heathrow traffic, though Gatwick seems more probable.

    In the end Animals album cover features the power station and pig from one photo session and a more dramatic sky airbrushed in from another. As a Pink Floyd fan I was slightly surprised to see that most of the Battersea power station I know and love has been removed, with only the four chimney stacks and two end walls in place at the moment.

    in reply to: General Discussion #232927
    Meddle
    Participant

    So you are a Sun reader! To think that my other post was removed as well. Is there a more meaningless phrase than ‘the Sun can reveal’? Murdoch crap for thickos, try harder.

    in reply to: So who owns all this junk? #819102
    Meddle
    Participant

    ‘My answer to that is then why didn’t they purchase one when they were ten a penny rather than wait until they are a rarity from someone that did have the foresight.’

    Because they were ten a penny, and not considered significant as a result? That sort of logic is a bit like me chastising my Grandparents for lacking the foresight to purchase first edition publications of The Lord of the Rings or, in my case, not getting JK Rolling to sign my Harry Potter book when I met her just after she published the second. Hindsight is 20/20.

    There used to be several more airframes at Long Marston, and they’ve been recovered. There might be a good reason the Meteor was left alone.

    “Ahh if I had the money and facility to house it.”

    Sell a kidney, buy a shed?

    in reply to: So who owns all this junk? #819199
    Meddle
    Participant

    As Elmdon Boy pointed out, others had better plans for the Meteor than to simply stash it round the back of a barn and let it rot!

    in reply to: So who owns all this junk? #819509
    Meddle
    Participant

    I’m a bit gutted that a Jetstream was delivered to Predannack this week, as it is probably the only other big/significant off-airport aircraft dump in the UK that I can think of. I don’t have a good feeling about the Long Marston airframes either, honestly. I’ve heard bits and pieces about the Shackleton being saved imminently, but it doesn’t seem to have come to much. The Meteor I’ve heard even less about. The Sea Prince seems to get a new scheme every few years from revelers.

    The Birlingham farm aircraft are still looking a bit rough, post cleaning. Then again legitimate museums in the UK have outdoor airframes in rough condition. I’ve heard about farmers with rare cars or military vehicles which they refuse to either restore or offer up for sale. It is an odd mentality but, knowing farmers, I know that you can’t simply tell them that they have to forfeit their possessions for the greater good. Things appear to be moving in the right direction regarding the Birlingham airframes, and a softly softly approach might be our safest bet if we want to see these aircraft saved in the long term. I’m personally a bit annoyed to see a Sea Hawk (apparently the best bits of WN105 and WF299) rotting away as they are less well represented in museums than the other types there.

    in reply to: Apparently Red Bull's Cobra has come a cropper #819522
    Meddle
    Participant

    Apparently Red Bull’s chopper has come a cropper. It just flows better.

    in reply to: Concorde Hard-points? #819732
    Meddle
    Participant

    Interesting petition results there. Fourteen signatures, of which six are from the South Wirral area and another six from the Edgbaston area. Good aviation links in those areas? Beyond that specific petition I’m surprised that even the tabloids seem to run a ‘Concorde to return!’ story every once in a while.

Viewing 15 posts - 421 through 435 (of 1,933 total)