The Remain camp did a stunningly lacklustre job of promoting the (then) status quo. If we take the phrase ‘ignorant and racist’ to basically mean an unthinking corner of the populous then I think the Remain camp had similar people; it is just that unthinking left-wing views (think protesting students) are somehow deemed more palatable. Both sides are replete with people that don’t really want to entertain dissenting views.
Quite amusing, but I’m not sure the Lib Dems can claim this victory cleanly. According to the latest Private Eye, Clegg made the fixed term parliament one of his strictest conditions for entering into the coalition in 2010. As such we wound up with the Fixed Term Parliaments Act of 2011, which now makes a snap general election highly unlikely.
It would be more unusual for a member of the opposition not to criticise an unelected leader over lack of mandate; it is simply what the opposition has to do.
If you want to talk about conspicuous absences, where has Tim Farron been hiding for the last month?
Just a thought, but of the 17 million Leave voters, neither the Labour or Conservative parties really seems to be representing them particularly well. Both parties seem aligned ninety degrees with the public, who are aligned more into the In and Out than traditional Left and Right camps. For example, UKIP has been steadily scalping votes off of the working class North, who traditionally voted for Labour (in any manifestation). Looking back it seems odd to me that the Leave vote was synonymous with right wing politics, really. Corbyn has been a Eurosceptic in the past, which might account for his fairly tepid Remain performance. Was there no scope for a leftist Leave camp? There might be scope for a right wing Leavers coalition of UKIP and the Leavers (or Leaves? Leavists?) within the Conservative party. Likewise the unhappy Blairites in the PLP and the Remain camp of the Conservatives might be better suited together in a new party? Either way both parties are fragmenting at a fairly unfortunate time, and I’m not sure who within UKIP can fill Farage’s shoes. Nuttall seemed the most obvious and least eccentric choice, but he has backed out.
I voted remain and my partner voted to leave. She made an interesting point, which I couldn’t really counter at all. A lot of left-leaning people our age are broadly in favour of de-centralising power and control to a local level. This broadly makes sense. For example, people we know in the North of Italy complain about their tax money being wasted on transport infrastructure in the South of the country. Likewise 45% of people in Scotland appear to think we would better manage our own affairs than Whitehall (assuming there is no latent anti-English sentiment at play of course, lol). Why, on the one hand, do people want to be able to manage their own affairs on a local scale but at the same time want to remain part of a political and legislative behemoth based on a separate land mass? I cannot explain it. What I can explain is my distaste at some of the Remainers I know personally. They spent the weekend of the 25th lambasting anybody and everybody that voted for Brexit, angrily pillorying them as old, ignorant and racist. By Monday the 27th they were still pulling the superiority card by apologising faux-sincerely for any upset they might have caused their closeted Leave-voting friends and relatives. Scarcely a day has passed since when they haven’t been circulating some pointless petition or whiney article asking for a re-run. It seems that they cannot accept that they are a minority and that there is more to this country than just them. Odd really.
I read an article a few years ago that suggested that a lot of US defence systems are riddled with Chinese knockoff components masquerading as the genuine article. This extends down the line to knock-off laptop power supplies and phone chargers that burst into flame in the middle of the night. Combine that with a fairly lacklustre attitude towards air and water pollution and almost non-existent product safety standards and you could argue that the Chinese have been trying to kill us, via our wallet, for quite some time!
So, if a person disagrees with you they’re a moron?
Try harder. It isn’t simply a matter of disagreement. Read RpR’s wilfully ignorant posts, and his pathetic, inflammatory debating style.
I have spoken to elderly black gents and they condemn what the “young punks” today are doing especially Jessie Jackson.
.
Ah, the old ‘I have a black friend’ argument. Jesse Jackson is 74, you complete moron.
Well said Bruce. At least I tried. From some of the preceding posts I guess it won’t be long before the instant experts plus the guy who has a mate down the pub who knows someone who he thinks once said he worked on Hunters a long time ago come along to enlighten us all.
I was wryly amused by a poster in one of the first Shoreham threads who claimed to have managed to recreate the accident in a Flight Sim using a Hunter model.
I think it is possible to carefully discuss the potential outcome in the event of 1) pilot error being identified as the cause or 2) an malfunction is identified within the Hunter. Even if 3) the AAIB cannot come up with a conclusive outcome this is a result in and of itself.
I do not believe that this thread can serve any purpose other than to invite speculation and potentially undermine proceedings. I’m sure that everyone on here has an opinion – but let’s just keep them to ourselves for now.
I think this forum, and perhaps a couple of others, are being far too protective of Andy Hill. At the same time posters on this forum are quite happy to speculate the causes when another, less cherished, pilot is involved in an accident. The Shoreham accident has shone a very powerful spotlight on the aviation and airshow communities and the culture attitudes and practices within, and this sort of neurotic, preemptive self-policing won’t help. You can find opinions about the causes of the Shoreham accident anywhere online from the Pistonheads forum to the David Icke forum (I advise against the latter). This forum is definitely better placed to host an informed discussion, and can even lead by positive example. It is clear that journalists go through these forums, so would you rather the next Daily Wail article quotes an aviation historian on this forum or ‘BimmerBoy’ on the Pistonheads forum when grasping for the next soundbite? When you have the partner of one of the Shoreham deceased going on daytime TV, in a bid to ban airshows, I think we should try a bit harder than to endlessly censor well informed opinions because they could potentially hit a few nerves.
Nice Bulldog! I like them in that scheme. The F35s are interesting as well. I got a glimpse of them, and the Hawk trailing them, following their flypast at Rosyth.
A busy old week in America. Two black men shot in as many days, and the Breitbart types are quick to try and dig up dirt on both victims. Five police officers shot by snipers at a Black Lives Matter protest. The initial suspect was apparently misidentified, being nothing more than an innocent man who turned up to a peaceful protest with an automatic rifle slung over his shoulder.
Just another quiet week in the land of the free.
Find it a bit hard to reach back there these days?
This is the major reason why we’re better out than in…
Because you are back to posting crap videos?
How did I know that you’d respond ? Tell me, what is a ‘logical fallacy’ ?
Google it. You will be asking me to wipe your **** soon as well.
I’m more than capable of holding my own in any evenly or ill tempered discussion – as I’m sure you know.
Where ‘holding my own’ means endlessly cycling through ad hominem attacks, appeals to authority, personal incredulity, strawman arguments, loaded questions and any number of other logical fallacies?
A curious bi-product of the second Gulf War has been the overall improvement of infrastructure mapping in Iraq. I’ve spoken to a guy who works out the back of a pickup truck over there, and they map safe routes for convoys, supply lines and such. At times these guys speak to locals to find out where ISIS have been operating, as ISIS don’t tend to plant IEDs on these routes.