dark light

Meddle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 1,933 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Shoreham Airshow Accident – AAIB Update Due Out Today #908597
    Meddle
    Participant

    But the members of one forum are seemingly preoccupied with the chance of much reduced photo opportunities and the eradication of their beloved naughty fields…

    If we are talking about the same forum, I found it hilarious that posters there were complaining about a pikey family turning up at the naughty and ruining their kip the night prior. If you drag £1000s of pounds of camera equipment around with you, but duck out of paying the entrance fees and instead view the airshow from adjacent agricultural land to save a few bob and drag your extended family along and expect them to sleep in tents then you are pretty much a pikey yourself. :highly_amused:

    And then they complain about poor airshow attendance and dull display line-ups… from the stubble field beyond the perimeter fence.

    in reply to: Shoreham Airshow Accident – AAIB Update Due Out Today #908600
    Meddle
    Participant

    I don’t consider 63 to be old and the late David Jenkins was not flying an old aircraft either.

    I consider 63 to be old, as does the RAF apparently. I know boomers want to hold the torch forever, but there are valid reasons you don’t have near-pensionable blokes flying fast jets in the RAF; your reactions are too slow.

    in reply to: General Discussion #224854
    Meddle
    Participant

    Forums are in decline generally. You have to give them your email address, think up a user name, fill out a captcha and then wait patiently for an email with a new link if your account is ‘approved’ by a moderator? What a convoluted workflow, when you are competing with Facebook, Twitter et al for members and content.

    This forum seems somewhat infamous. I’ve stumbled upon posts on other websites from ex members. There must be a reason so many valued posters have left over the years! Perhaps we should take a look at who is left. 😎

    in reply to: Deceased Personalities. #1793750
    Meddle
    Participant

    Forums are in decline generally. You have to give them your email address, think up a user name, fill out a captcha and then wait patiently for an email with a new link if your account is ‘approved’ by a moderator? What a convoluted workflow, when you are competing with Facebook, Twitter et al for members and content.

    This forum seems somewhat infamous. I’ve stumbled upon posts on other websites from ex members. There must be a reason so many valued posters have left over the years! Perhaps we should take a look at who is left. 😎

    in reply to: Vampire Survivors #911268
    Meddle
    Participant

    The Venoms went to Ireland and are in external store. I don’t see a good future for them.

    I thought they were sold for parts etc? Did they all end up in Shannon?

    in reply to: General Discussion #224934
    Meddle
    Participant

    I don’t understand why some endlessly fantasise about what may go on in prison showers.

    in reply to: Well he was trying to lose weight and get fitter #1793804
    Meddle
    Participant

    I don’t understand why some endlessly fantasise about what may go on in prison showers.

    in reply to: WW2 collection to go under the hammer #917665
    Meddle
    Participant

    Didn’t the Shackleton guys at Coventry need more props after the theft from their stores?

    in reply to: General Discussion #225597
    Meddle
    Participant

    It seems that the railway equivalent of ‘The Naughty Field’ is to simply wander onto the tracks when a noteworthy locomotive approaches:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-35661445

    in reply to: Interesting News Snippets #1794473
    Meddle
    Participant

    It seems that the railway equivalent of ‘The Naughty Field’ is to simply wander onto the tracks when a noteworthy locomotive approaches:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-35661445

    in reply to: Manchester collection #844034
    Meddle
    Participant

    As for the debacle about the chord surely an easy fix build a bridge instead of severing the line not rocket science is it?

    Stephenson’s?

    in reply to: The japanese sword jet #844107
    Meddle
    Participant

    I think it’s because his posts/website smack so much of ‘no effort’. He rips stuff from books/internet, does no research (unless one counts Googling, which some sadly do) and posts purely to get others to make money for him.

    I don’t see any harm in that. It is quite interesting to see multiple photographs in one place. Some elements of this forum, and historic aviation forums in general (I lurk on other forums that I don’t have membership to) seem to thrive on some sort of insider or hidden knowledge, whereas Pampa14 is at least archiving photos in a central, easy to discover location.

    in reply to: The japanese sword jet #844297
    Meddle
    Participant

    Now calling himself Robert Fitzgerald from New Jersey on Hyperscale! Same post different name

    Why does his posts bother folk so much?

    in reply to: Yeovilton secrets #845357
    Meddle
    Participant

    Is that the Sea Hawk that was on static display at Montrose Air Station until fairly recently?

    in reply to: General Discussion #226455
    Meddle
    Participant

    Look at it now – superficially if you like – complete with female ‘facilitators’ with voluminous skirts and dangling earings.

    I’m too young to understand this stereotype. I thought the big moral dilemma of the ’80s was women beginning to wear trousers in the workplace? When were ‘voluminous skirts’ a source of contention?

Viewing 15 posts - 841 through 855 (of 1,933 total)