dark light

Meddle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 1,933 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Keeping us in the dark. #851265
    Meddle
    Participant

    I thought that there cannot be too many people with your name! Many thanks for demystifying and uncloaking the world of luthiery for the rest of us! 😮

    in reply to: Keeping us in the dark. #851271
    Meddle
    Participant

    ‘We turn the lights off to make photography better’

    Really, you can’t invent stuff this good

    Are you the same chap that writes books on guitar building?

    The photography claim doesn’t make sense. Perhaps, in some bizarre way, it encourages visitors through the doors if they have been previously subjected to dark, incomplete photographs and they want to fill the blanks.

    in reply to: Kermit Weeks Lancaster #851341
    Meddle
    Participant

    I suppose it is a trade off. Without Kermit’s intervention we might have ‘the case of the Lancaster scrapped in the late ’80s’ on our collective consciences, and it is good that the thing is in clean, dry storage somewhere. Yet, I do wonder is how many airframes Kermit can actually restore, and a Lancaster is a massive undertaking. Building a Frankenstein of the smashed Strathallan machine and KB994, which is something of a rough barn find if my memory is correct, seems like a lot of work. Being a (Canadian) British machine, you do wonder if it is down Kermit’s pecking order anyway…

    in reply to: Pacific Aircraft (etc) Graveyard #851919
    Meddle
    Participant

    Posted on here. I see that bastion of fine journalism, Unilad, is misreporting that this cache of sunken gems is somehow a new discovery.

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #851923
    Meddle
    Participant

    I wonder what they think.

    ‘Stop putting words in our mouths’, or ‘stop volunteering us for Vulcan babysitting’ perhaps? 😀

    in reply to: Vulcan XH558 spirited display at RIAT #851949
    Meddle
    Participant

    The “Academy” is a romantic project that may well prove to be something far less exciting than it sounds. It’s easy to create these proposals but it’s far less easy to establish their viability. But even if this “Academy” does get built, the concept of having XH558 as its centrepiece is laughable. What has a 1960-vintage strategic bomber got to do with 2015 aerospace engineering? Absolutely nothing of course. You have to get past all the hype that is spewed-out by VTTS and seriously ask why an engineering a technology facility would have any interest in a relic from the 1950s/1960s. Any serious establishment is far more likely to suggest that space should be allocated to things that are of use, not museum pieces. I suspect that this whole project has very little to do with the future of the Vulcan and much more to do with the personal interests of some people within VTTS who are looking at their own futures.

    On top of that, VH558 isn’t a truly historic airframe either as it has modern equipment on board. The way I see it, working on it would teach you neither a full set of conservation skills or a full set of modern aerospace engineering skills. In the CGI mockups of the Academy, XH558 lurks in the corner like an odd mascot, alongside an Airbus creation of some sort. I’m not sure what qualifications you would gain from working on it, or if VTTS members are qualified to work with kids. Does XH558 become a playground for high school kids to learn about lead dress or to merrily over-torque screws? All of this is of course conjecture on my part.

    I have a feeling of deja vu. Didn’t we have this thread before? The performance at RIAT looked amazing compared to the usual ‘noisy glider’ routine, and it gave me an impression of what the Vulcan was capable of back in the day. Hopefully they do something equally spirited at Prestwick.

    in reply to: Spotted (2015) #852032
    Meddle
    Participant

    Lockheed Orion P3 heading in to Edinburgh airport ahead of East Fortune tomorrow. Hopefully some other interesting aircraft come past this afternoon!

    Edit: I missed the Blenheim sneaking in.

    in reply to: North Weald DC4 being dismantled???? #852470
    Meddle
    Participant

    Boom boom! I first heard about this pair on the forum 28 Days Later, where some Urbexer managed to sneak onto, and take shots of, one of the DC4s.

    in reply to: £7,000 sale price for international airport. #480434
    Meddle
    Participant

    Pricier than Prestwick, though it looks like it has better quality facilities. :highly_amused:

    in reply to: North Weald DC4 being dismantled???? #852584
    Meddle
    Participant

    Are there not two DC4s there?

    in reply to: Production quality and finish #854595
    Meddle
    Participant

    Its not just wartime aircraft. Its often to be found that parts that fit one aircraft won’t fit another due to the variations in shape and where fixings are (or rather where they should be!).

    Such as when it came round to fitting the new wings to the Nimrod MRA4s? :highly_amused:

    in reply to: Shorts 360/330 #854886
    Meddle
    Participant

    I remember these things landing and taking off on Tiree. Surprised to see they are now ‘historic’. Time marches on!

    in reply to: Replica Spitfire wheels up landing Sibson #382753
    Meddle
    Participant

    I saw this incident covered by ‘War History Online’ on my Facebook feed today. One comment suggested that the pilot “should have shut his engine off after he cleared the end of runway, so as to not damage the engine from prop strike”.

    This sounds like fanciful nonsense to me, and I’m always wary of armchair pilots online at the best of times. Is there any credence in these words?

    in reply to: Replica Spitfire wheels up landing Sibson #382759
    Meddle
    Participant

    To quote the Greatest Newspaper on Earth;

    “The pilot was unharmed after the incident and – apart from a broken propeller – the plane appeared largely undamaged”.

    Presumably the CAA won’t take such an optimistic view, and the engine will need to be stripped right down? We’ve also not seen the underside of the aircraft. :apologetic:

    in reply to: Daily Mail strikes again #855427
    Meddle
    Participant

    Stop dragging this thread off topic, John.

    Here you go, get back to running General Discussion as your personal blog/pensioners lunch club/gossip network/UKIP recruitment centre. Leave this section of the forum to those who can actually formulate a decent argument once in a while.

    http://forum.keypublishing.com/forumdisplay.php?8-General-Discussion

Viewing 15 posts - 1,276 through 1,290 (of 1,933 total)