dark light

Saab 2000

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 3,080 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: KLM could sacrifice NWA alliance #712626
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    NWA is linked up to Continental and with Delta who is already in Skyteam, why would they try with American?

    in reply to: KLM could sacrifice NWA alliance #712832
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    Yes, as I have said I cannot see a break up from Northwest occurring, as it would be too damaging to KLM to lose such an intensive partner. No one would give KLM such an enveloped alliance as Northwest currently does and so they are highly dependent on them. If they went into Oneworld they would have to forge a partnership with American, but this would only be limited with a huge loss of capacity. If you like, KLM needs Northwest more than Northwest needs KLM and so to head towards SkyTeam would guarantee that their relationship continues.

    KLM wants a European partner and I think that from an operations point of view it would be a better fit in to Oneworld with not just Trans-Atlantic operations and European but also worldwide operations, although certain issues over power in my opinion keeps them separate. Firstly, KLM regards itself as a major European airline and so is quite demanding when it comes to alliances. If they joined Oneworld they would always be in the shadow of British Airways and American, not the position they would like considering what they possibly could get out of an alliance with Air France and SkyTeam in terms of being a major player. British Airways also would not like to see its lucrative Trans-Atlantic market going to Amsterdam. While in the long term it would seem a good deal to see transfer passengers going to Amsterdam due to constraints at Heathrow, in the short term British Airways would lose out to Amsterdam which has expansion capabilities. You only have to look at Aer Lingus, Iberia or Finnair to see they operate niches with no threat to Heathrow, KLM is a different story being too close to Heathrow. In the end it would be in British Airways’ best interests to see KLM head towards SkyTeam as Air France would not give up expansion at CDG for Amsterdam, therefore weakening KLM.

    in reply to: Swiss 340 #712838
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    That is beautiful.

    in reply to: Sun Country Livery #712841
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    I actually like it. The blue and orange look good together.

    in reply to: Southwest #712843
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    I think they only operated the one 727 leased from People Express. If you look at the registration it gives you a clue, N564PE.

    in reply to: Trip Report: GCI-JER-GCI #712848
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    Thanks guys 🙂
    Ren Frew, Bergerac is still one of my favourites to watch 😉

    in reply to: Trip Report: GCI-JER-GCI #713366
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    Well firstly I always prefer the Trislander to the Shorts, just has more character with the Shorts being quite an unsightly aircraft, “the shed” summing it up nicely. Sadly though I have to be content with the Shorts on inter island to Jersey now but I was up in Alderney a couple of weeks ago so it is not as if I won’t travel the aircraft again.

    The Shorts I don’t think is really that popular with the passengers, uncomfortable and loud are the comments I have heard though how people can complain on a 20 minutes flight is really absurd. I actually found this new Shorts quite quiet though on landing I always think of drums beating. Landing can be bumpy, you no you’ve landed let’s put it that way, nothing like those smooth ERJ’s I have seen all day. However, it is reliable for such short sectors and Aurigny could operate no other large turboprop on the route so efficiently.

    Some good points (yes there are some!) are that in the cabin you feel really quite high up and unlike other aircraft it is quite roomy owing that to its shape.

    in reply to: Tunisia Monastiar Airport Help!!!!!!!!!! #713580
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    Enjoy yourself, I’m sure members will be interested in a trip report when you get back 😉

    in reply to: Low Cost News #714647
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    Yes, already there are signs of market maturity, Ryanair acquiring Buzz, Easyjet acquiring GO. Of course you will see expansion to new niches especially Eastern Europe but the number of them is shrinking and along with it will be the number of airlines. In the end the winners will be the ones who keep to their business model like Ryanair.

    It does seem a bit like the dotcom boom in the 90’s, hype but no certainty and substance. Face it, which airline doesn’t want low costs? In effect the term is used too lightly with more emphasis placed on reducing operating costs than actual passenger fares. However, low cost airlines know what they have to sell, low cost seats for travellers whereas all these Internet entrepreneurs lost track of reality and direction though in comparisable terms it would seem a legitimate example of what the low cost market could be like in the future.

    in reply to: Which Airline Would You Like To Fly With #714817
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    A few really obscure airlines from the CIS would be fun, Air Kazakstan or similar airlines.

    in reply to: Tunisia Monastiar Airport Help!!!!!!!!!! #714830
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    You travel a lot, you get around the place…I think that was the intention.

    in reply to: Celebrating 4000! #714835
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    Wrong person Hand87_5 😉 Congratulations, you’ve accelerated passed all of us to get there 🙂

    in reply to: Low Cost News #715868
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    Too many, your looking at a saturated market. Just wait for the bubble to burst and consolidation will be right behind that.

    in reply to: Iberia A340-600 to LHR!? #716898
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    I think the Iberia A340-600 was also flying Madrid- Tenerife flight so Heathrow doesn’t surprise me. If you look on A.net there is a picture of it landing at LHR.

    http://www.airliners.net/open.file/394159/M/

    in reply to: Boeing to discontinue 757 #716903
    Saab 2000
    Participant

    A sad fate, however, it doesn’t surprise me. With orders way down for the aircraft, production of the aircraft would be well below normal so in turn making it hard for Boeing to produce the aircraft profitably. The deferral of the Continental 757-300 was quite a blow to the aircrafts’ production I believe.

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 3,080 total)