Looking at the airport schedules they are all 732s.
But I worry about the yields, I think they would probably be quite low in this market. The North American model generally looks for high yields not a whole range of different types like the Indian market. Therefore, you are going to need a lot of heavy marketing and sales to make a success of this route.
Also, with AC being not in the best of health opening a new and risky route is not the best idea. Anybody remember Canada3000?
If Afriqiyah is Libyan why does it have a Tunisian flag on the tail? Is it ex-Tunisair or something? Nice photos anyway, I remember CDG very well.
In general I believe this route will probably be a success, the traffic demand between India and North America is quite sufficient with the additional benefit of connections to and from Asia. What I believe is a little excessive is the non-stop routing. Is there really that much of a demand? I mean there is no other direct option from North America to India, is that the state of the market or a strong advantage for AC?
Contact an airline or aviation based company that you would like to work for during work experience, explain the situation and see what they say. There are many aviation jobs available (at least I knew that from my experience last year), from mechanics to general office work centred on aviation. In July I worked at a local tourist attraction, it was brilliant. I was slightly jealous of my friends who were able to get free rides in aircraft although I thoroughly enjoyed me own experience.
August 2001 was issue one until issue nine in May 2002 I believe.
Extending one of the points there, many European and American airlines strategies now focus on operating aircraft such as the A340 or 777 more, placing stress on frequency over capacity. Really it is a sign that passenger carriers now do not see as greater market for the 747 as before so the segment is much smaller.
4 looks like a Dash 8 to me. British European?
I think it’s fifth largest..LHR, CDG, FRA, AMS, MAD?
Anyhow that is true that IB would recieve access to BA’s strong North American network also. No real overlap or conflicts of interest are there?
Valladolid isn’t going to really attract the UK tourist is it, possibly more for the Spanish traveller? Santiago would be an absolutely brilliant city for Ryanair, it has a lot of potential as a city destination itself I would think, plus a pretty large catchment area for Oviedo, Léon and possibly Vigo and the boarder with Portugal.
Sorry I didn’t have time to do the rest before, here you go again. Some definitions might be slightly out on accuracy but here are the basics from what I understand. I think there are probably others who can help you out in more in depth terms.
1-Load factors are used to measure aircraft in-flight capacity utilisation. It works by comparing potential capacity of an aircraft in relative to its actual performance. Simply it is percentage of seats filled.
3- RPK is the abbreviation for revenue passenger Kilometres. It is found out by times the number of revenue passengers carried by the distance travelled in km.
4- FTK is the abbreviation for Freight Tonne Kilometres, similar to RPK.
5- I think to make profit on one seat you have to use CASMs (Cost per available seat mile) by adding up all your costs and then dividing by the number of seats available?
Originally posted by keltic
Merger?….sounds interesting. I still can´t see why BA is so interested in getting such a dull airline as Iberia.
Why wouldn’t BA be interested? They are by far one of the best matches in Europe. BA already has a 10% stake in Iberia so the indications are there. They are both very healthy airlines and they are already alliance partners with an in depth relationship. BA would gain access to Iberia’s rule of the Europe-South America flights; Iberia would gain access to BA’s predominant Middle East and Asia routes with little overlaps on networks. Moreover, a healthy connection between the UK and Spain. In my opinion they seem like a perfect match in Europe for consolidation.
Freedom rights are the framework for bi-lateral and multi-lateral agreements between two or more countries. It basically states that an airline needs permission from the countries it wants to operate to before it can fly in, out or over that certain country. There are eight rights:
First freedom is the right to fly over a country without landing.
Second freedom is the right to land in a country for the purposes of re-fuelling or maintenance, not passengers.
Third Freedom is the right to land in a different country from their own country for the purposes of carrying passengers.
Fourth freedom is the right to fly from another country to their own country.
Fifth freedom (most famously of all) is the right to fly passengers from their own country to another country and then on to another country.
Sixth freedom is the state’s right to carry traffic between two other countries via the state.
Seventh freedom is the right to operate stand-alone services between two other countries.
Eighth freedom is the right to fly cargo and passengers within the boarders of another country.
Confusing but extremely relevant.
I’m not sure about code sharing with BA but I think Aer Lingus’ expansion might leave BA rather anxious as to Aer Lingus’ future as a partner. Consider this, all of BA’s Oneworld partners before the entry of Swiss, were on the boundaries of Europe (Finnair, Aer Lingus and Iberia) all serving niche markets for the big guys at Heathrow. The more they expand the less interlining that is needed with Heathrow. When they expand more to the US then this is just emphasised even more. Their reliance on Heathrow is shrinking, traditionally they always had pretty bad European links and so BA and Heathrow were of great importance. Now, well 28 new destinations in two years gives you your answer.
The strange thing is that the Easyjet uniform originates from Benetton. Though in my opinion they don’t look too stylish, they do their jobs in resembling the airline effectively.
My favourite…
Gulf Air, not the best image but still gives an idea of the Balmain designed uniform.