Yeah, Sauron, Criticism of Israel Goverments = Anti-Semitism
By that standard how many Israeli citizens are anti-semitic?
Hmmm… Lybia was a PR stunt. They wern’t forced, they were
bought. Which was a far more clever thing to do than to
conquer them and then have a messy open ended conflict
draining US military resources…
That the US ruling elite lets itself be blackmailed by Israeli politicians is not new. What is new is that now the DoD civilian
leadership is itself linked to Likud… Wich in turn get’s the US
fighting Israel’s wars and end up with messy conflicts with
no end in sight draining US military resources…
Distiller posted:
“Brits do the mighty right thing if they stay away from the French/Bruxelles quagmire.”
Yeah but they couldn’t avoid following the mighty shrub into the
Iraqi quagmire. Realy wise of them brits… :rolleyes:
It’s all about vision, you know… the sort of vision that get’s you
3,000 combat casualties and counting… by the way add 3 dead
today to the vision thing count.
PLA wrote:
“And there is something with vortices generated by canards making troubles for double tails…”
Can someone explain me if the “dogtooth” on MiG 1.42 canards
is there to control the formation of such vortices?
I haven’t seen the AFM supplement, but one can see a similar
error in the official EF factbook’s diagrams (p. 19), where they put Storm Shadow
missiles in each wing root pylon, making way for fuel tanks
in the mid-wing pylons, but simultaneously obstructing the
main gear movement: :confused:
http://www.eurofighter.com/Documents/General/2002.1.FactBook.pdf
It’s abreviation for ring laser gyro.
Anyway you have a very good point on the IR signature.
Have to go now, dinner with family. Merry Christmas!
Matt, it is not the size o the inertial central that matters
but you would agree that an RLG is much lighter than those
EM suspention ones used on the SSBNs, that have less drift.
I don’t know if the russians can currently make laser gyros
with accuracy closer to their mechanical counterparts. That is my
doubt.
::: Sorry! Double post :::
Matt, it is not the size of the inertial central that matters
but you would agree that an RLG is much lighter than those
EM suspention ones used on the SSBNs, that have less drift.
I don’t know if the russians can currently make laser gyros
with accuracy closer to their mechanical counterparts. That is my
doubt.
I have some reservations about the plasma stealth technology.
In particular, for strike missions you would most likely not be able
to use the terrain following radar, which means that if you want to
do low level penetration you better be carefull to have a much
updated 3D-map of where you’re going to fly…
It could also mean that you would have to navigate using the
bomber’s inertial
centrals instead of satellite navigation, which would require very accurate gyros and accelerometers, which unfortunately means added weight.
Aerospacetech, I’ve been searcing for
a long time for pictures of the Raduga Kh-101
but the only thing I find is Kh-55 / Kh-555 / Kh-65.
Do you have one and could it be posted?
Hi, Srbin
Is it possible for you tell me what is the source of the first picture
you posted?
Doesn’t anybody else want to engage in a little speculative
discussion about this project?