dark light

Andraxxus

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 858 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2151045
    Andraxxus
    Participant

    How they are contemporaries, really? Different gen, different weight class. Even if you are ignoring the generation difference (which would reflect design goals), you can compare MiG-21 with F-5, not F-4, and F-4’s counterpart would still be Su-11.

    Then I still disagree about comparing them such way. Its very much like comparing F-5E with F-15A, based on the fact they are introduced with a few year intervals and finding F-5 to be inferior.

    US built F-86, Soviet MiG-15 built same year was inferior, so response was MiG-17 2 years later.
    US built F-100, Soviet responese was MiG-19 2 years later.
    US built F-104 and Soviet response was MiG-21 2 years later.

    This is due to US generally led the technological advances, and Soviets merely countered that in their best abilities.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2151240
    Andraxxus
    Participant

    It’s been up against aircraft and systems supplied by a peer force constantly. In Vietnam many of the enemy pilots were Soviet. Take the Bekaa Valley Air War, US supplied force vs Soviet supplied force, result, walk over.

    This is the most distasteful combination of two particular traits; ignorance and arrogance;

    MiG-21 is a 2nd gen light class aircraft. Its direct counterpart in west is F-104. F-4 is a 3rd gen heavy class of aircraft. While it has no direct counterpart in Soviets, its generation-vise counterparts is MiG-23, Su-15TM and MiG-25.

    Unsuprisingly, F-4 is a better aircraft than MiG-21 in all circumstances; It has a radar that deserves the definition, has potent BVR capability, better WVR missiles. In terms of aerodynamics, F-4 actually has better sustained turn performance and climb rates, so it was actually a better dogfighter in trained hands, plus it was faster too.

    Likewise F-15 and F-16 are 4th gen aircraft, their counterparts are Su-27 and MiG-29. Comparing them with previous generation of aircraft is nonsense, as those aircraft excel in all criteria.

    So are you chestpounding because then cutting edge US fighters achived parity with a generation older Soviet aircraft?

    Only relevant air-to-air victory comparisons would be encounters in similar generations. Only suprising aircraft in such encounters was MiG-25, which was pretty survivable because of its speed. It maybe worth mentioning that in all the encounters that an F-15 or a Su-27 faced MiG-29, heavy types prevailed. Actually, that is also an expected outcome as F-16 and MiG-29 were born as cheaper alternatives to fill the roles where more capable F-15 and Su-27 would be unnecessary. This definition alone says, they are by no suprise inferior to Su-27s or F-15s.

    in reply to: RuAF News and development Thread part 15 #2161263
    Andraxxus
    Participant

    @FalconDude, the question is, what if Turkey-US relations go worse due to forthcoming events in Syria, and US blocks F-35 sales to Turkey?

    Turkey is planning to develop its own fighter and it’s only primary concern would be how to make this a reality.

    I think this is the key. Radar of “TFX” will be domestic with domestic GaN transistor manufacturing technology already demonstrated, domestic FCS is already being tested on an F-16, domestic mission computer is already flying on 401th sq. F-16s, domestic-built FADEC will be available in few years through agreement with MoU. All that remains in question is bare engines and airframe. Engine choice is still completely uncertain (consider this to be an insider info), and aerodynamics will be solved through cooperation with SAAB; a cooperation that is yet to bring anything fruitful beyond preliminary design stage.

    Its quite a nice coincidence a recent new friend of Turkey happens to have a 5th gen fighter airframe with superbly refined aerodynamics, and will have engines much more advanced than anything currently offered to Turkey. Its also quite a nice coincidence that this friend is a little short on money, and a 15+ billion $ worth of procurement (16-25 billion is the amount currently Turkey foresees on spending F-35) would mean a lot to a project with current estimated program cost is 30 billion $.

    Turkey can easily buy empty airframes & licence to produce them, pay some great amounts (as in billions of $) and licence produce the Type 30 engines, and put everything domestically developed for TFX project to that aircraft. Even some technical expertise for completion of its own radar designs would be possible. It wouldn’t be as difficult as MKI or other “integration” processes, as there wouldn’t be an integration, everything bar the airframe & engines would be Turkish design and readily compatible with everything TuAF has.

    When domestic design option is concerned, this option would not only be quicker and easier, but also cheaper for Turkey (which didn’t designed a fully domestic aircraft since 1930s), and it would be quite beneficial to Russians economically and politically (a great leap for dragging Turkey away from Nato). Wishful dreams, I know, but that would have been a win-win.

    Andraxxus
    Participant

    and it’s pretty likely that was done precisely to antagonize Russia. Did Erdogan really want to do that? Did the US through it’s NATO/gladio networks have the influence to organize it?

    I fail to see the logic. Erdogan already said pilot shot down was also arrested as part of the coup, but he also said this is totally unrelated to the shooting down event. From another POV, if that was true, why should Erdoğan not acknowledge this and save his own face? Many in Turkey didn’t exactly approved that shooting down event. If that was true, such action would have served very well to his internal politics.

    It’s pretty obvious the Su-24 was shot down in a well set up trap,

    This conspiracy theory, I don’t understand. What made this Russian Su-24 special? A Russian Su-30 invaded twice, it was not shot down, a Russian Su-34 invaded twice during the operations and those were not shot down either.

    Turkish side said they didn’t knew the identity of the Su-24 before shooting down. They have shot down different Syrian aircraft, and surely this Su-24 didn’t get any special treatment than those. What is not to believe in this official explaination? What makes you think this is a well set up trap for this aircraft that makes the basis of your other teories?

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2166739
    Andraxxus
    Participant

    That footage was seen in the promo video of MAKS-2005, when it was still called Su-32.

    https://youtu.be/9zxb0Q6hZgA?t=4m19s

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2168684
    Andraxxus
    Participant

    Is it possible for Tu-22M to drop its bombs in selective amounts? For example if it takes off with 33 FAB-500s in internal bay, can pilot drop 6 if he wants? If not, then why waste bombs?

    Andraxxus
    Participant

    Never..??

    “Never” for 35 years of conflict would be a too far fetched claim I am not that old, but in last 15 years or so, no Turkish tank has been penetrated by RPG and written off. Only injuries to a tank crewmen were a few months ago, in a short version of story, A M-60A3 got hit by a RPG (probably RPG-7), a fire broke out outside the tank, driver panicked and left the tank from his hatch, but tank didn’t blew up. Instead, it slided down the road and landed onto the top of a building down hill. 3 inside the tank were injured due to the fall, presumably Commander, Gunner and Loader. TSK initially claimed this to be a problem with a defective ammunition, but sound from the video published by Kurds in region suggests a RPG launch&hit. If you know of any other damaged/destroyed tanks of TSK, please share, I would like to know those as well.

    Andraxxus
    Participant

    A nonsensical claim, TBH.. No video cameras are capable to tell what are those convoys of trucks ferrying stuff from Turkey to Syria and back loaded with.. It could be anything from bags of rice to MANPADS and they would still look the same from above.. so exactly what kind of proof would you expect to get?

    You tell me? Its Russians who post photos of Trucks as “proof” of Turkey buying IS oil. The problem is, they turned out to be Iraqi trucks, and picture turned out to be taken in Northern Iraq. If you think such photo cannot prove anything, then you are saying two things; 1- Russians are simply talking nonsense 2- They’ve lied for nothing. I don’t share your idea and I do think some aerial footage can be a proof of that; ie, same convoy of truck leaving IS refinary, followed by an UAV all the way to the Turkish border, for example, could have been a pretty convincing proof (as Russians attempted to sell it) but I would have expected a footage at the very least to be taken in Syria.. In terms of law, Russians gave falsified evidence and this is considered a very big crime in any modern country that I know of.

    Davutoglu in Nov 2015:
    It was decided that in the event of our airspace being violated, all necessarily measures would be taken, all relevant orders to the armed forces were given by me, personally.

    Davutoglu in Jul 2016:
    “I did not give the order to shoot down that plane,” Davutoglu told NTV, claiming it would not have been possible to give the order as the Russian plane allegedly spent 17 seconds in Turkish airspace

    Are YOU being serious? You are nitpicking two sentences to answers given to two completely different questions; (Unfortunately our press does the same to make headlines a little more sensational, I honestly don’t blame you on this)

    1st one was a statement about that the order given to military for shooting down any aircraft crosses border was given by the prime minister.

    2nd is an answer to a question regarding was he was in contact with military during the shooting down event, and his answer is in the lines of “I am not a soldier within the chain of command”.

    Obviously, Prime Minister (and parliament) give orders to Chief of staff to airforce command within the military hierarchy down to the pilot. Its very stupid -of you or anyone else- to expect Prime Minister himself calling the pilot to gave the orders. Aside from the technical impossibility, a politician cannot give orders to military in that way. Such orders must come from proper channels within the military. You are watching too much movies, I think.

    BTW, the regret was not offered on day 1, it was first offered in Erdogan’s letter to Putin in June 2016, 7 months after the incident..

    Ok, to be fair, it was offered on 26 Oct 2015, day 3. He said in France a) he regretted* such event occured, b) had we known aircraft belonged to Russia, we may have made our warnings differently, but he also said “he won’t apologize to Russia, for an event Turkey was right in its act. If anyone has to apologize, its Russians who crossed our borders”. What changed?

    *I don’t know if that is lost in translation somewhere, but Turkish word “üzüntü” translate both as sadness and regret, and Turkish word “pişmanlık” translate both as regret and remorse. He said “üzüntü” maybe 20-30 times on those events, first being in France.

    LOL… you are now completely losing any credibility in my eyes.. . it’s Edogan who is writing letters of regret, not Putin.. it’s Erdogan doing the traveling to Moscow to restore the relations, not Putin to Ankara.. It’s Putin who is rolling back the ban on the sales of holidays, food imports and construction, not Erdogan.. And finally, it’s Erdogan who is calling Russia “a strategic partner and a friend”, not vice versa.. so WTF are you trying to sell me here?

    Don’t act like a 7 year old child. “hey its erdoğan begged putin” “hey erdoğan came to moscow” blah blah blah. What were you expecting, really? Its Turkish side who shot down the plane, how Putin could write a letter of regret? “I regret you shot down our plane”, yeah right. Its Russia who initiates sanctions, Turkey merely reacts to that, and now obviously its Russia rolling back them back first. How can you pass these as some “Russia strong!11”?? When you re-read what you have posted, do you REALLY think what you wrote has any logic?

    Again, in this political stand-off, Russian side demanded apology, got none. Demanded compensation for aircraft got none. Demanded compensation for family got none. Demanded punishment of those who killed the pilot and so far, got none.

    From Turkish side, it was regret on day 3, NO apology on day 1, only took equvalent action to Russian sactions from week 1-2, and called Russia a partner and a friend ever since day 3. Contents of letter was exactly that, now why Russian reaction softened after 7 months? Was it too difficult to translate those from TV?

    Don’t try to sell this as a political victory of Russia. What matters is Russia didn’t got anything they wanted, period. I don’t have to sell you or anyone, anything. From political perspective, Turkey shot down the aircraft, and got away pretty clean with it.

    But, Ankara Mayor Melih Gokcek argued that

    You are taking quotes from a man who even managed to connect his rivals to illuminati. Seriously, Trump says Obama himself created ISIS and you quote a man who don’t even have 1/1000th credibility of Trump. Its YOU losing credilibity by such quotes.

    What Putin want from Turkey, the one big thing, is creating a rift between NATO and Turkey. That has been one of Putin long term approach since he became President. Not just Turkey, but any NATO country.

    Who knows, he may got his wish… US-Turkey relations has never been this bad, ever. This time its not just some political disagreement or some usual anti-capitalist folks dislike them, whole of Turkish population hates US for their PYD policy, and their refusal to return Fethullah Gulen.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2172058
    Andraxxus
    Participant

    It is hard to tell, but the shape of the dispenser doesn’t really look like KMGU to me, it has fins at different angles.

    Ah, I think you are right. Those are most definately FAB-250s or FAB-100 from 6x multiple ejector racks. Watching the video itself at 0,25x speed, all 6 bombs on the right side are clearly seen attached to the pylon, and then they detach. All 12 bombs originate from the innermost pylons, outer pylons were probably already empty before the video starts.

    in reply to: Russia moving tac air troops to Syria #2172439
    Andraxxus
    Participant

    Since 4 dispansers are still on the pylons, and sub-munitions appear to be originating from them, I would vote for KMGU-2 too.

    Andraxxus
    Participant

    By the way, not to drag this out, but within a few lines you managed to put through the Turkish side’s position. Just for the record, Greece has offered to use the equidistance principle as described internationally for those islands that cause Turkey concerns, but Turkey has refused to do so. Greece has even offered international mediation, Turkey has again said no.

    Equidistance from where? Equidistance from mainlands, and 6 mile around the islands is accepted by Turkey. 12 mile from Greek mainlands, and 6 mile around islands AND 6 mile around Turkish mainlands is also accepted by Turkey. Equidistance from every piece of rock that stick half meter out of water? That leaves as few as 3 miles to Turkey in some regions, no international waters, and whole Aegean sea, its fishing economy, military significance will be handed over to Greeks. Any ship that passes from North of Crete island to west of Kos island then all the way straight to north into daranelles. If 12 miles is accepted, then every trade ship bound to Turkey would need to add 740+ nautical miles to their journey: to the east of rhodes, and closely following Turkish lands in order to make to Dardanelles. Is this seem a fair deal to you?

    International mediation from whom? Who will be the mediators? Will they be Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan? Its obviously unacceptable to Turkey if mediators are expected to act impartial almost certainly.

    Any proof has been made available by the international press on multiple occasions. Google will suffice in this case.

    Ah, perhaps my google is malfunctioning, care to share them?

    Are you sure you should be saying this online at this time? I mean we may have different views, but I would hate you being dragged in some cell with the accusation of being against the regime and an impending death penalty above your head!

    ROFL.

    Well, the very question of this thread implied political underlays. So.. political goings on and long standing policies are what we are hinting here.

    Nonetheless.. whether it is nonsense or not, is proven beyond doubt by your… heated reaction. 😉

    Heated reaction, because your post has exactly nothing to do with the orignal topic or the message my post delivers Political or not. Its only purposed to be anti-Turkish, and that only.

    Since you failed to get the message; When we buy western weapons, a) seller tries to dictate how we can use the product we buy b) seller doesn’t provide what we want, which is the means to produce the product ourselves, not simply buy them painted and polished. So we seek new sellers a) doesn’t care how we use their equipment b) allows us to build and modify their product as we please.

    This decision has nothing to with dislike againist west and sure as hell it has nothing to do with Greece or Turkish or ISIS or any of the BS you’ve written.

    [QUOTE=MSphere;2330444]Let’s be realistic here, anyone even remotely capable/willing to provide such evidence has magically found himself on the arrest list for the coup supporters..
    Well, lets be realistic here, anyone with such capability wouldn’t be residing in Turkey, but logically, he would be in Syria with a video camera, or it would be some Russian or Syrian recon aircraft taking pictures from air.

    Every single bombing, every cluster bomb, every SRBM, every ATGM launch in Syria is caught on a video camera and found its way on to the youtube. Now Turkey collaborating with IS, providing them weapons and taking their oil for 3+ years and there is no single proof of that? Gee, I only hope our intelligence service is 1% as good. Idiots even get cought by petty journalists while trying to provide arms to Syrian Turkmen..

    I think Russians simply have traded their “acknowledgement” for something else, most probably pretty valuable to them..

    Your own speculation. Our own speculation in Turkey is this; Russia expected 1-formal apology, 2-compensation for the lost aircraft, 3-compensation to the family, 4-judgement of the men who killed the pilot. before relations can be improved. Turkey offered NONE of these.

    Even yesterday, Erdogan said, 1-Russian side admitted first aircraft crossed the border but they still deny second aircraft which involved in the event crossed the border. We will provide all radar data to Russia to prove their border violation. 2-They (pilots who shot down the Su-24) are being trialled of a crime totally irrelevant to the shooting down event so don’t try and make a correlation between these two unrelated events. 3- Alparslan Çelik (who is claimed to be the man who killed the russian pilot) is under arrested for totally unrelated crime of carrying unregistered firearms, although his trials and concerning the killing of the pilot is also ongoing and evidence is being looked at, it would be inappropirate for me to comment on an ongoing trial.

    From where I stand, “regret” was offered on day#1, and Turkey’s position hasn’t changed the slightest since then. So I believe there is something Russia badly needs from Turkey, so badly and immediately that they even gave up their pride in this matter, swallowed all their statements and come to table over an unfounded excuse of passing “deep regret” as an “apology”.

    selling the THK pilots as “traitors who have damaged our good mutual relations”..

    Where did he said that? Only statement I recall is “our good mutual relations shouldn’t have degraded by a mistake of one pilot”. Which was considered as selling THK pilots, and he had to correct that with “I was obviously referring to the mistake of Russian pilot who crossed our border, of course”.

    Andraxxus
    Participant

    No not trolling, I would respect the opinion, and agreed with most of it (especially I too trust military several times more than Erdogan, or I dare say, I trust our military but I don’t trust Erdogan) and few million others in Turkey -myself included- also considered that possibility of “staged” as well. But I don’t think that is the case, you think as such simply because you don’t know about the internal problems of Turkey.

    In the shortest of summary; Jemaat of Gulen, among several others, was a known threat even in 1990s, those illegal organisations always used religion to find followers and had formed their own hierarchy and tried to gain key positions in government; before AKP, either 1st or 2nd man Turkish intelligence agency was always a general from the military, and military was allowed to make its own assignments and promotions internally. This resulted in military kicking out suspected jemaat followers (be it of Gulen or Nur or whatever), and every year 60+ high ranking officers among perhaps hundreds of petty officers were kicked out solely for this reason.

    According to retired chief of staff, after Turkish intelligence agency became all civillian, intelligence reports about such jemaats stopped. Military tried to deal with it internally, but military intelligence is merely for internal security for counter-intelligence, and not even allowed -by law- to conduct such espionage of its officers so this was ineffective. Worse, AKP had changed laws and now military couldn’t kick out officers as they please, and highest ranking military assignments would be done with approvement of some ministers, and military was only allowed to make suggestions about that. According to him, “If you suspect someone to be gulenist, all we could do was to ask his superiors or his subordinates about suspicious actions. If those were also gulenists they would have protected, military had no way of exposing jemaat followers without assistance of national intelligence agency”

    While this increased the AKP’s grasp on military, this also increased army’s vulnerability to such jemaats that could act outside the chain of command. Initially this was not much of a concern perhaps even desired, because AKP and those jemaats were acting together. In the last few years, AKP got way too strong, and got in conflict of interests with those jemaats. It was Jemaat of Gulen that leaked tapes proving AKP’s corruption, and AKP government revealed malpractices of pro-gulenist corporations.

    With that hatred grew day by day, this latest act is definately from members of Jemaat of Gulen that reside within the military, and NOT from military itself or from someone pro-AKP. In my own opinion, Gulenists thought should they start the coup, military would follow, that would explain why pro-coup soldiers tried to convince chief of staff to BE the leader of the coup, even offered him to speak with Gulen himself. But since that failed, and 1st Army and 2nd Army commanders ordered their forces to withdraw to their bases, “coup” was over, and only after that point bombs start to fell to strategically unimportant, but sensational targets, scorched earth policy in a sense.

    In simplest terms, they tried to MAKE the military to throw AKP, but military itself chose not to. As such, I see this as a terrorist act and not a coup, maybe born out of desperation of Gulenists, or some pre-planned act for a goal not revealed yet, and in the end it MAY end up serving Erdogan more than anyone else -as he is great at twisting everything to his own benefit- but I don’t think he himself staged it in any degree.

    Andraxxus
    Participant

    Funny how Greeks also have their hundreds of considerably expensive tanks waiting for the -imminent according to the Turkish rhetoric- day those Leo A4s will invade the Greek North as a pincher move to divide Greek forces between the north and the islands that the Turkish forces will invade since they dispute, well, pretty much everything! Let’s not forget that there are a couple still standing casus belli existing in the world and the one is the one Turkey issued to Greece!!! so …

    And your point in typing THIS in this topic? As irrelevant as it gets, Turkey has every right to act on a issue relevant to Turkish-Greek sea borders; on everywhere else such problems are handled by diplomacy. Greece offered none, and Turkey say casus belli IF Greeks say fait accompli. How this makes Turks hostile cavemen and Greeks good guys? If some country had found an excuse to deny Russian transition from Barents Sea and used this excuse to block Northern Fleet from reaching open seas, without even consulting Russia diplomatically, Russians would have acted againist that too. Had you’ve been Greek, I would have respected the opinion from your POV, and shared our POV, but since you are not, I won’t discuss such topics with a Turkish-hater idiots who has no knowledge, emphaty nor objectivity, I am sorry.

    And let’s stop pretending Turkey didn’t support ISIS. They only reason Turkish forces are on the borders with Syria is so the Kurds don’t get their own Country.

    And proof of your nonsense? Look, I don’t like AKP or Erdogan for a dozen obvious reasons, but man said he will resign if anyone proves any assistance or cooperation with Islamic state. Same repeated by our minister of foreign affairs. And all russians did was to show some photos of trucks from Syria, which later turned out to be the trucks of Iraqi Pesmergah in Iraq (by their own acknowledgement), and Russians implied those trucks go to a refinary, which is actually owned by Koc family; one of the most secular, anti-religious and AKP-hater families in Turkey. Russian “proof” became a laughing stock even for AKP-haters for weeks, myself included, and even pitied by some as an act of desperation of talking too much BS while having so little to back it up, they had to openly LIE to the entire world.

    Other than that, there are plenty of hot air and empty talks, and, again, no proof back it up. Only falsified proofs exist, like the Russian BS I’ve mentioned, some photos by some US “analyst” showing a Turkish soldier IS terrorist side by side, Turkish soldier has pre-2009 land forces army uniform -which can be bought online- in a picture taken in 2015 and an AK-47 that is never used by Turkish Land Forces.

    Somehow the notion of National identity escapes the turkish policies since the Ottoman times.

    And, again, your point in this nonsense?

    Andraxxus
    Participant

    Its laughable to interpret what Çavuşoğlu said as such..

    From where we stand, days of “free” NATO aids in weapons is long gone last one being M-60A3s in 1991. Now we spend $$$$ on new weaponary and simply put, western weapons come with too high price tag attached and I don’t mean money…

    For example lets talk about tanks.. Germans *sold* us Leo2A4s on conditions they won’t be used in conflicts inside Turkish territory, or Turkey’s South East. While Turkey didn’t lost any tank or tank crewmen againist PKK (though 3 crewmen injured as an indirect consequence of a RPG hit), you could surely imagine how we feel regarding Germans about that. What if our soldiers die tomorrow when technical difference between a Leo2 and a M-60 may save them? Hundreds of our most modern tanks is just waiting for the never coming day Greeks invade Turkey, while 2nd army is actively fighting a war againist terrorism and watching the hostile borders of Syria with simply obsolete M-60A3 tanks; all that to make Germans feel happy about it. This is only one of the mentioned high price of buying “western” defense equipment.

    Turkey plans to start serial production of its own domestic Altay tank in Q4 2016. What good will building 1000 domestic tanks do if we have to beg Germans for MTU diesels & spare parts, and what good those tanks are for if we cannot operate them the second our disgruntled German “allies” cut the supply of replacement engines and spare parts? When we ask for 100% licence production, somehow every one of our western “allies” become very reluctant. And there is a -very well deserved- mistrust to our western allies in fulfilling their contracts the second Turkish actions get politically “inconvinient”..

    Now the Turkish perspective; MTU diesels are great, but if Hyundai accepts licence production, then our new defense partner will be Koreans. Their engines may be not as reliable, but we would be manufacturing those engines our own, along with necessary spare parts as well. If Ukrainians offer co-development of the next generation 1800hp diesel for Altay, then our next defense partner will be Ukraine and not Germany.

    Its not about a hostility or a hatred againist west or NATO, its just business, and its just a move towards being more independent when we can.

    Rest of your comment as in:

    This means the days of tech transfers from the west is probably done. no more f16s. their stealth fighter project probably dead now (they never had the resources to begin with).

    is pathetically foolish.

    Tech transfer from west done? LACK OF tech transfer is the reason why Turkey prefers NOT buying western equipment anymore. Tech transfer is the sole prerequisite of all latest procurements, for example, US agreed on full tech tranfer and licence production of S-70 a few months ago, and T-70 will be the utility helicopter of Turkish Army. They disagreed to tranfer technology of AH-1Z, so there wont be a AH-1T, and A-129 is chosen instead. No country on earth wanted to transfer tech about UCAVs back in ~2007, so we bought from no one, started flying our own armed UAV designs in 7 years. We wanted to licence produce Hellfire missile, US didn’t allowed that, and our UAVs and T-129 today fly with domestic ATGMs. List goes on and on, you see my point, I think.

    Regarding Stealth fighter project, I can safely say TAI is still recruiting new personel each month just for that project, and since you haven’t been to TAI, you haven’t got the slightest idea what resources they may or may not have at their disposal. You probably don’t know the fact TAI is producing the middle hull and inlet ducts for for LRIP F-35As since ~October 2013, and I’d say they have quite equipment and the expertise for working with appropirate materials and composites required in a 5th gen fighter.

    Andraxxus
    Participant

    do you really think the military is competent enough to do large coup after 15 years of AK rule. they did what they could.

    Problem was/is never the AKP rule. When AKP first elected, military didn’t want to make a coup, because that would have shaken the “civilized image” of Turkey, and automatically and perhaps permenantly prevented accession of Turkey into the EU. Same conditions still stand, great majority (98,5% according to TSK) didn’t take part in this “coup” attempt. The thing is, they didn’t actively take part AGAINIST it either. They stayed neutral (and tried to made coup attemters to stay neutral) but did not mobilized to stop the coup; only military action taken by TSK was to bomb the Akıncı Air Force Base AFTER the coup attemters already surrendered at Gendarmie HQ.

    The answer is very simple: The coup was not planned and executed under full chain of command, but targeted the “nerve system” of the armed forces.

    The primary aim was to take over the full chain of command and capability of the armed forces, an aim that was not sought after in the previous coup.

    That doesn’t explain it by far. How does flying F-16s over the city at 22:00 pm (1.5 hour before first tanks and APC/IFVs spotted in Ankara), or blocking bhosphorus bridges help with taking over the armed forces? How does bombing parlement achieve that? Those are ALL actions to terrorize and intimidate people, not of a coup which was supposed to target government structure for take over.

    I don’t buy the tried but failed part too. Again, why plan as such? Why plan to act on a day where president, prime minister, minister of interior were all outside of Ankara, with exact wherabouts unknown? Even then, a coup supposed to target the government would have begun by assasinating those figures first, then moving on to military to restore hierarchy, then moving on to streets and taking over. But no, those guys moved to streets first, waited 1+ hour to make everybody notice them, then moved againist chief of staff, waited 4 (FOUR!!) hours -during which they allowed erdogan to make his speech-, then “attemted” to assasinate the president; after he left his hotel, of course. Smells like nonsense to me.

    Their lack of gaining full military doesn’t explain this in any way. They had more than enough men to achive those goals. Three ~10 strong teams with their helicopters could have moved swiftly and assasinated key government figures right at 22:00 pm, before they were aware of the coup and before they could resist. But no, not 10s but 100s men were on the bridge, taksim and kızılay squares. Or, they were trying to make a statement in TRT like its still the only TV channel as if we are in 1980s, BEFORE they gained control, only helping people to notice there is a coup.

    Then declaring curfew at 22.00pm on friday night is another funny part. Telling people to stay in their homes when they are already outside, and block the roads and so they couldn’t go to their homes even if they wanted to. Yeah great planning..

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 858 total)