dark light

eye4wings

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 184 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: BBC4 tonight 9 'Shooting the War" #1139276
    eye4wings
    Participant

    As one who took part in the program ( speaking on behalf of my father) it was also sobering how little of his experiences I knew or was able to pass on. My mother did not like him talking to us kids about what he saw. I think it brought back all those hours spent wondering if her newly married husband would return. And he only told us things if we asked especially.

    One of the cautionary things he said to me when I was a young lad was “You wouldn’t be so bloodthirsty if you had been walking along the beach and found a seaboot – and found a sea leg still in it.”
    So much went with him when he died.

    And when my own generation is gone who will have the ghost of an idea what it was like to be hustled under the table every time the characteristic drone of the buzzbomb was heard, or the wait with breath held when it stopped?
    At least we have some film left us – and our imaginations.

    in reply to: BBC4 tonight 9 'Shooting the War" #1138568
    eye4wings
    Participant

    PaulR,
    50 type 5 LCTs, with 2130 among them, were lend-leased back to the Americans complete with British crews for the initial landings at Omaha Beach. He was then freed to go to the British areas where the craft were maid-of-all-work. Anything that wanted ferrying they did until the Mulberries were operational.

    Thankyou (on his behalf) Sealand.
    Pulse jets were never exactly suited to stealth!
    Although what the Americans have working on recently may be closely allied. I refer to the high level serrated vapour trails over Mexico that have gaily been put down to UFO activity in recent years. Now there’s an area rich in speculative theories!

    in reply to: Proctor Progress #1109246
    eye4wings
    Participant

    I too really MUST get over and see your handiwork this year (having totally failed last year).
    I was interested to see the 1:2 scale Proctor 5 hanging above the work and from which your forum name doubtless comes. Is it a flyer? Radio Control or single seat? Or static only?
    What’s the story?

    in reply to: What Is The Ugliest Plane? #1103822
    eye4wings
    Participant

    Ah, a beautiful piece of functional design Moggy – to which florid motifs have been added in a superb blend of Victoriana!

    Sadly I believe it can’t be considered as it is, strictly speaking, a router.

    in reply to: Skyraider scale drawings? #1092706
    eye4wings
    Participant

    This isn’t much really – but for a start you could have a look at Wikipedia.
    They show three views of dubious quality – and accuracy it seems at a glance.
    Perhaps suitably adjusted by reference to the many photos they include it might be sufficient.

    All my books seem to be types of WW2 – too early o course.

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2019 #778776
    eye4wings
    Participant

    Duxford based Tiger Moth R4922 made a successful forced landing in a standing oat field near Fowlmere earlier this afternoon after experiencing some rough running. Thankfully both crew were completely unharmed as it stayed upright and undamaged.
    It was carefully towed out of the field by a tractor this evening.

    Sounds like some real pilot skill there. I assume he stuck the tail into the crop to achieve that. Come into a crop like that tail high and you’re over! Bit unfortunate not to be able to make the strip at Fowlmere though? Any more detail available?

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2019 #784602
    eye4wings
    Participant

    We have had another unusual aircraft overhead Ware (Herts) today. A Do.28 Skyservant flew over SSE at about 12.45 and on reciprocal at about 14.30. From and to DX perchance?
    Anyone know it’s destination?

    in reply to: Meteor crash 1950's, Harpenden. #774100
    eye4wings
    Participant

    With apologies for the huge lapse in time… I too am puzzled by the divergence in reported angle of descent. The sound I heard was consistent with a shallow rate of descent, but a much steeper angle is also reported immediately before impact. It would be interesting to know the result of the enquiry. The shape of the crater would have reflected the angle but the information given in this thread does seem to suggest that wreckage was scattered all around the impact point suggesting that the angle must have steepened. I wonder if the reference to ‘bomb bay doors’ (which of course the Meteor does not have) was actually a sighting of the inner undercarriage doors being down preparatory to putting the landing gear down?
    I realise of course that our perceptions of the same event can vary quite widely but there may well be a logical fusion of the two – which the inquiry may have discovered.
    Is this accessible to the public?

    in reply to: Percival Q6 G-AFFD #774165
    eye4wings
    Participant

    The co-ownership by Finest Hour presumably explains why the airframe has been repainted in RAF camouflage – as seen in Nik Coleman’s film. This would be to accord with the story that it MAY have been the aircraft that flew Charles DeGaull to Britain when France was over-run.

    Robin

    in reply to: Duxford Diary (2017) #788631
    eye4wings
    Participant

    Thanks for posting the link Bob.
    It was great to read of the illustrious history of Britten-Norman.
    I was delighted to see the Trislander appearing in Duxford photos as I have had a great liking for the design for many years. I built an 80″ span model of G-JOEY back in 2001 when Aurigny had just changed their livery. I built mine in the earlier livery pictured in the linked DAS article. I believe it is still flying in other hands.

    in reply to: Percival Q6 G-AFFD #778145
    eye4wings
    Participant

    I think that was during its spell at Redhill, at which point the aircraft was looking very sad.

    Robin

    in reply to: HMS Illustrious off to the Breaker's Yard! #828072
    eye4wings
    Participant

    As I said, I’m not really into ships – but that seems a LOT of money for three years’ service to the nation. Does someone in charge of our defence have a lack of foresight? … or is technology moving faster than I think?

    So if she’s not actually unseaworthy how come we’re so sure she won’t be sold on?

    in reply to: HMS Illustrious off to the Breaker's Yard! #828238
    eye4wings
    Participant

    Close, but no cigar…

    You seem to recall wrong – Belgrano was ex USN.

    And I believe the condition of such vessels, having usually been through storage without any attention other than to make sure it doesn’t sink and cause more cost, is not great; you will notice that recently former naval vessels have not gone very far to be scrapped, ie not India. Plus the contract of sale (or whatever it is called) probably stipulates that the vessel will be scrapped – no discussion, certainly no sell-on.

    Ah well -I never claimed infallibility for my memory – least of all now!
    And my knowledge of things naval was never a matter driven by enthusiasm… which was a disappointment to my RNVR father.
    I may also be wrong in my lack of confidence in how binding a contract between different nations might be. Not that this will have the slightest bearing on anything of course. It’s about as valuable as my vote while within the EU.

    If the Illustrious is in such unseaworthy a condition I suppose we should be praying for the crew as they pass through Biscay and the Med… and hoping it’s not a case of CoD!

    in reply to: HMS Illustrious off to the Breaker's Yard! #828799
    eye4wings
    Participant

    I have to say I am probably more concerned that our warships are sold at scrap value to whichever foreign nation puts in the best tender. What is to prevent them being reclad and sold on at say £10m to face us in some future conflict. I seem to recall the Belgrano was ex R.N. – and was enough of a threat to warrant a couple of torpedos to take it out of the picture.

    in reply to: Info Sought – Canberra Incident Debden 11th August 1953 #830458
    eye4wings
    Participant

    The field of corn is off-shot to the left?

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 184 total)