The P40 in American markings whistled over Ware this afternoon so the Hawk 75A wasn’t the only mover today.
Also, and somewhat more puzzling, I was fairly certain I saw (and heard) a distant Vampire – not the one you’ve been keeping is up to date with though surely? If so that would be very quick work!
The P40 in American markings whistled over Ware this afternoon so the Hawk 75A wasn’t the only mover today.
Also, and somewhat more puzzling, I was fairly certain I saw (and heard) a distant Vampire – not the one you’ve been keeping is up to date with though surely? If so that would be very quick work!
Unfortunately I can’t really put a lot about before the model design is published because my editor doesn’t like to see anything he is about to publish already in the public domain – and as I said it’s been a bit ‘stuck’ lately – for reasons non model related.
The wings are mostly done now and when assembled together making me wish I had built a larger workshop!
Just started building the plug-in nose section, which has the benefit of having no tricky aspects to it so that I can encourage myself with a bit more visible progress.
However, I did post videos on You Tube – really to show other future builders that even with my very meagre engineering skills (and equipment), that awful undercarriage is possible so they wouldn’t be put off building one themselves.
http://www.youtube.com/user/R0binF0wler?feature=watch
Thank you for your interest Ben. Maybe about this time next year….
haavalds, is your Lanc finished now?
It looked decidedly odd without its cockpit and turrets – and its escort would have had a hard time keeping up, but it had a good ‘sit’ in the air and looked very well-behaved.
Care to post a pic or two we could drool over?
My Stirling has got kind of ‘stuck’ about half way built as I have been struggling to get those Gouge flaps operating. Being electric and lightly built it would not be in the same speed category, but I am looking forward to sitting it next to a Lanc or a B-17 on the field. The Stirling is very much the forgotten bomber – which is why I chose it as a type. I prefer types that as few others as possible are flying.
Anybody know if a Firefly was in the air yesterday?
Apart from a very fleeting glimpse which gave the impression of a white fuselage with a large roundel on the side I only got the bins on it for a dead-on rear view.
Merlin engine definitely – but did not sound quite right for a Mustang (which I thought it might be for a moment) – and besides I couldn’t see the give-away ventral cooler – so Firefly without the wing tank and radar is my best guess.
Flying North over Ware (A10 visual) mid afternoon.
Anyone see it?
My dad took me over to an open day at Radlett (where my uncle worked for HP later, making wind tunnel models) when I was a lad. It must have been sometime in the mid fifties. My abiding memory was of a beautifully detailed model Lancaster crashing on the tarmac when the control lines went slack. Very sad!
Makes me wonder why all the fuss over phone hacking just now.
Oh – almost forgot – they tested it in ‘isolated conditions’. I wonder where they went to be clear of radio signals?
And of course they’re only doing it (on behalf of our various totally trustworthy governments) to warn us all of what might be – or IS – possible – so that’s all right isn’t it?
Sorry… is my cynicism showing?
With you both there gents!
I do RC flying ‘sport-scale’ and it has to be cheap – so I keep cheerful!
That’s good news! Sounds like you’ve made good progress since your ‘Sir Crashalot’ days! Keep having fun!
My Zenair 701 has now had a couple of good flights, but I have yet to get on top of the landings.
The Q6 is published as a plan (and part kit) in the May issue of RCMW.
Hi Daniel,
Small boys have been known to attempt to make that kind of model fly by the simple strategy of throwing them… but from personal experience I have to say that the flight achieved is not normally what one may call ‘realistic’ and some may quibble about the use of the word ‘flight’!
An interesting range of models though – and ones I was not aware of. Suitable for arranging on the desk as the starting point of dreams…
If you have aspirations to get involved with flying models you may be interested to know that if you have that sort of money available some models are now being sold ready to fly including radio for under £100.
How things have changed!
I would probably have a go at using that sort of size prop on electric Steve, although it is on the large side and way beyond any motors I’ve used so far. I’d be looking at a motor with a rev/V figure of around 250, which would be a larger motor anyway, and use it on a low cell count. But I would be looking at a weight of about 10-12 pounds for the model – and of course nothing like the excellent detail of yours.
Now I’ve had a look at your video and the stills showing some of the detail work I can see it’s well up to the excellent standard you have already set.
Gorgeous looking bird!
But personally I wouldn’t dare fly it! It’d take a better pilot than I am – which no doubt it will have.
On the prop, I think it might just be possible to use the scale prop on electric. Obviously I don’t know what size that big paddle is but I have just tested one of the motors on my 115″ Pe-2 on a 20×10 2-blade prop that draws 50A at full throttle on a 5S LiPo pack. That is the stated maximum for the motor (£60 unit cost) so if I wanted to I could probably just get away with using a 22″ 3-blade wooden prop if I fancied buying a couple of 4S packs for it, bearing in mind that this is tested static and the current will drop a bit once the model is moving. The thrust felt collossal at that and felt like the model would fly on only one engine.
As I already have the 5S packs though I will probably leave it as it is or even, having accepted that I am going to be using non-scale props, back off the size a bit to something less overpowered.
Thanks for sharing the pictorial evidence.
(Ignore the signature below! – worth a whole box of cigars!)
Very nice Steve!
So that’s two of us awaiting a test flight.
Scale prop too I see… you don’t mention any gearing so I suppose it will have to fly with a non-scale one?
Oh that’s just typical of the habitual compartmentalised thinking of our decision makers.
They probably thought the Chinese might put it back in service and give us problems we couldn’t counter!
I wonder what sort of task force we will be able to raise when we have to go back and reclaim the Falklands again. (Is their carrier still operational?… The one we sold them that is). I can just see us going to the French to ask if we could borrow one of theirs please! And in the unlikely event of them saying ‘yes’ what would replace the Harrier force? (2 still-airworthy Seafires, a Swordfish…)
I hope our seamen can still pull an oar!
I wonder what the total cost of sinking the Implacable was (explosives, fuel and other costs involved) and how many years’ preservation that would have paid for.
Oh dear, I’m just getting old and disillusioned I suppose!
Right Rich, I also have that plan. I picked it up from the club as it was being disposed of by another modeller who couldn’t bring himself to throw it in the recycle. Most useful in-operation photos of the flap system I have seen, but the design also looks very heavy to me. It’s the sort of sturdy belly-landing design we used to have in those days for rough field work.
If I may make so bold I would suggest you take the plan and reduce the thickness of everything by 50%. (With the exception of that 1″(!) bit of balsa block in front of the cockpit which could do with being 1/16″ soft sheet round a couple of formers.) It would repay you by being much nicer to fly. Something near 2 pounds should be feasible.
One of GiantCod’s little Thumrun motors would fly it a treat.
I would think folding wings would be a bigger challenge than working flaps on that model. A simple torque rod run from the fuselage on the forward operating arm would suffice – though it would require retracting undercarriage for protection or there’d be no point going to the trouble.
Good luck with it anyway.
I look forward to seeing it.