According to IDR in 2003, a Moscow based research institute appiled RCS technics to Su-35 (not BM, the old one). This includes new Canopy, RAM applying to engine and air intakes, and also quite complicated methods for reduction RCS of Radar radome. The Results is at least 20dB reduction of RCS, the article says that detection range of Su-35 is decreased by half.
Now 5 years passed we know new Su-35BM has some RCS reduction work, I think that RCS of Su-35BM will be close to Rafale.
For what purpose F-100s are used? For CAS or combined day light air defense/CAS?
Rear-Facing Radar can be used for dogfight with combination rear-facing R-73M/R-74.
I think the main problem is usage of AWACS plane. AWACS plane may be used to support air defense planes in order to give them situational awereness but in this scenario offenders probably will use high and densed jamming, which may collapse data-links. So my point is if there are humans in AWACS plane at least they try to send information in alternative ways (like secured voice radio etc). If you got air dominance in a region unmanned AWACS is OK but you have technologically advanced opponents I think unmanned AWACS is a big question mark.
What is the idea of unmanned AWACS plane? I don’t think it is useful.
Can anyone give examples of aircrafts’ ranges in hi-lo-hi or lo-lo-lo or lo-lo-hi?
I remember that Americans claimed their digital-RWR technology is good enough to detect and locate LPI radars. Even analog-RWR carring fighters that also carry JTIDS is succesful against locating radars (which is promted by BAE Systems), there is no information how it is good at intercepting LPI radars.
Su-35 will carry “new” RWR system, but we don’t know the “new” system is digital-RWR or analog-RWR. But if it is digital one, Flanker’s offansive and defansive capabilities will increase dramatically.
A few months ago a report in English (I can’t remember the source) states that Chinese anti-aircraft C3 system is mostly based on COTS technologies. According to this report that has some advantage, for example: COTS system (like Wi-Max, or public phone infrastracture etc) and main software kits for these can rapidly change, and also frequently change so that, it is hard to use Information Operations against these systems. And expensive specialised C3 systems are so static that it is hard to change both hardware and software in short period, some analysts also belive that Chinese air defense network is always updated.
What kind of airplane is suitable for terrain following? As stated above low wingloading affects the plane in bad weather condition such that it is hard to control the plane in very low level flight. Powerful engines is also a must.
Whether an aircraft has LO features or not flying in 30m high and plus a supersonic speed makes an aircraft hard to detect and also hard to shoot. And as a dipnote low level flying may increase EW system effectiveness (bounce effect), which is good for self-defence. I think for low level flying aircraft it is good to have chaff/flare dispenser on top of the plane.
Explain please? Some sort of Active Defense?
http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Hobbies/Military/PRC/Ground/Unknown/U1335P27T1D493136F3DT20080402145828.jpg
http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Hobbies/Military/PRC/Ground/Unknown/U1335P27T1D493137F3DT20080402145834.jpg
http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Hobbies/Military/PRC/Ground/Unknown/U1335P27T1D493139F3DT20080402145838.jpg
http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e338/Hyperwarp/Hobbies/Military/PRC/Ground/Unknown/U1335P27T1D493138F3DT20080402145836.jpg
I couldn’t remember exact name but this is kind of passive defence system for high value targets against Laser and Optical guided munitions.
Hermes is a modular missile system, now it uses INS and SAL, but in land based form of the Hermes it is interesting to see that there is a pretty big radar antenna on the vehicle, I couldn’t figure out purpose od the radar but I think radar is to scan a wide area than may be it can also send command signal to Hermes missile. Probably there will be evolution from basic Hermes to more complicated IIR/active MMW RADAR.
MiG’s ILA’08 brochure speak:
[ATTACH]162904[/ATTACH]
A Questions:
-So far we know RVV-AE active guided missle, and what about RVV-SD and RVV-MD? (May be basic R-77 with different guidance systems e.g passive radar guidence or IIR)
and
Kh-38MAE: Possibly Kh-38 with aktif radar (anti-ship maybe?)
Kh-38MLE: Possibly Laser guided variant
Kh-38MTE: Possibly IIR guided variant
Kh-38MKE: Possibly satellite guided variant
we don’t know much about Kh-38 but I guess it may have range over 30km, so while western airforces using unpowered middle range smart bombs (AASM, JSOW, JDAM-ER etc), I think Russian choosed rocket powered missiles for same role.
Beside Qatar’s purchase, there is an additional news about C-17B, jdw states that Boeing may develope C-17B for in-theatre (tactical) roles. C-17B will have updateded engines that give extra %13 power, and its max. take-off weight will be 30000lb more (615.000lb). C-17B will be available about 2013-2014.
As far as I know in MAKS-2007 a Russian radar producer demonstrated a radar complex for PAK-FA. This radar is a X-band AESA radar, and it has also L-band IFF system, there is also Ka band elment but I couldn’t figure out why it is exist.
Does anyone has an idea about it?