Thanks for starting this thread Stormbird, they are good little books.
I too have the Flying Boat volume and some others in the series. Can forum dwellers confirm that all that were listed were ever published as I have never seen examples of some of them.
In the War Planes Of the Second World War series listed are:-
Vol 1/2/3/4 Fighters (I have these)
Vol 5 Flying Boats (and this)
Vol 6 Float Planes (never seen)
Vol 7/8/9/10 Bombers and recon (Never seen)
They also published Warplanes of WW1
Vol 1/2/3 Fighters ( I have seen these)
Richard
The biplane in the first picture is a Armstrong Whitworth Atlas, trainer version rather than the army co-operation version.
Fourth picture in a line up of Avro Tutors is a Airspeed Oxford at the far end, strange colour scheme that could be yellow, just looks odd due to the film.
In the open hatch picture some AW Whitleys are sitting in the far distance.
The biplanes in the third picture are Westland Wallace
Richard
I think that the cockpit shot is a Hendon.
John
Yes I thought Hendon except it looks like two seats one behind the other, were Hendons like that?
Richard
RAF10 with ‘Hutchinson Henlows’ enscribed is possibly White Avro Cadet 640 G-ACPB, used by the Cobham Circus in 1934 with two others of the mark painted red and blue. The name could refer to a Mr Hutchinson who was Cobhams chief engineer of that year.
Richard
Just watched the beginning, its the best bit of the whole film, Hurricanes in France, fantastic.
Richard
Hello Jerry
As far as I can find the first Mosquito to fly in the US was the first Canadian built example, KB300 a B.VII Bomber that first flew on 24th September 1942 at Downsview and this aircraft was demonstrated at Wright Field on the 29th of October 1942.
This is according to the FABER book, ‘Mosquito’, Authors C. Martin Sharp and Michael J.F.Bowyer, ISBN 0 571 04750 5 for the hard back or ISBN 0 571 09531 3 for the soft back.
Richard
I know the RR Eagle was a stop gap engine fitted to the Wyvern while the Python was developed.
I have always wondered if it would have been better aircraft, reaching operational use earlier, saving on development, being simpler to maintain, more reliable and possible being produced in larger numbers, if they had stayed with the Eagle for the whole production run.
Richard
I cant help with your query, but I also like the car. I had a Mk1 Cortina, rolled it on the road that runs along the North side of where Greenham Common airfield was, near the tower, Burys Bank, just past the the golf club.
Richard
Repcobrat
Since you first made your original post on this subject I have been looking for more detailed or breakdown figures, so far without any success.
It would be interesting to see for example the losses at initial training establishments and OTU’s. And how were training accidents at operational squadron counted, are these in the total?
I have known many wartime engineers over the years and have never heard any of them talk of different standards within RAF. What has been said though is that the pressure was on to produce serviceable aircraft, and this sometimes led to aircraft being released with defects that under normal circumstances would have been fixed.
The point I am making is that the pressures were there in all aspects of aircraft operation, lack of spares, ground time, hangar space, specialist tooling, technical support etc. The OTU’s may have just been worse in that they usually had the battle weary, hand me down fleet.
Richard
Hi Steve
No, she’ll not be a flyer. Imagine how hard it would be to get the ‘new’ wings certified! In fact, we’d have to take all of her apart and put her back together again in front of the appropriate people (at great expense) to get her certified now. Not to mention the substitution of airworthy parts (at the moment best reserved where possible for flyers) for many sound but non-airworthy ones. So, for the forseeable, she’ll be a ground runner. Which is a shame.
But who knows what lies in the distant future?
Beermat
I am not being critical of your intentions with the rebuild of this aircraft, its very commendable. I also do not fully understand the difference in structure between fabric and metal covered wings other than the external appearance, but would it not be far far easier/cheaper to build some wings in wood/metal that are fabric covered, they would look completely authentic.
Please explain the structural difference, I always thought it was just the external surface that was different.
Richard
The Hawker Henley, I believe…
Thanks BEERMAT for your explanation, its obviously more of a progression from the steel spar design used in the Hart series and Hurricane tailplanes. The later metal wing is far more modern in design style.
Incidentaly many years ago while working on Hurricane outer wings the drawings we were using were marked ‘Hurricane and Henley’ so I assume Henleys were also fabric or metal winged.
Richard
I had never thought of a Lockheed 12A as a potential for the collection at Old Warden, but if the rumour has any substance I would certainly welcome it.
Having one airworthy in a UK collection is very appropriate, a number were impressed into use by the RAF at the beginning of WW2 and Sidney Cotton made good use of them.
Richard
Yes I have been trolling through some of this footage, unfortunately the titles and headings are a bit obscure so finding specific things using the search facility is difficult. There is some fantastic stuff though. For example film of the Lympne light aircraft trials if you search under Lympne.
Richard
P.S And did the whole population chain smoke ln the 20’s and 30’s.
Graham
Could this tank be for windscreen de-icing clycol rather than engine cooling. Is that a glass site window in it.
Richard
Just stopped for a quick look at whats happening at Lasham, not a lot really.
The SWWAPS site was padlocked shut with no one around.
The two Meteors, Hunter and Wessex are still complete. The Sea Hawk has the Stbd wing missing but is otherwise complete. The drover is in bits and just the wings of the Prentice are lying in the grass.
Richard