No mention of engine problems!
Regards
Yes their is, it says the the pilot was busy with engine management tasks, a big enough problem requiring a huge amount of skill I think. Unfortunately modern airfields with defined runways are far less suitable for the operation of this type of aircraft.
Richard
The good and bad from this incident are:-
Good
1. No one hurt.
2. The aircraft is obviously repairable.
3. The legs folded into into their wells and were not torn off, hopefully less damage to the wings.
4. Both legs folded up so nothing dug in that might have spun the aircraft around or worse.
Bad
1. The engine is obviously badly damaged.
2. The prop is a destroyed.
Richard
Remember a cost goes with using the brakes as well, they wear out and would normally need overhaul in normal use. Although I suspect the Vulcan crew has a stock of already overhauled units to draw from which will last them to the end of its flying life, so the real cost has already been spent.
Richard
P-38 Lightning by Jesse Alexander published 1990 Chronicles the restoration of 44-23314 ‘Joltin Josie’ at Chino.
Alan
It looks like a Oil tank as used on RE8’s it sits across the fuselage just in front of the pilots feet. It was probably used elsewhere though on other Farnborough designed aircraft.
See the third image down on this page http://thevintageaviator.co.nz/projects/re8-reproduction/vintage-aviator-re8
Richard
Is that a radial or a rotary engine? Ed
Its a Rotary, which means the whole engine, bar the crank shaft is spinning.
Richard
I cannot believe some of the moronic comments made here!
Well said.
Nice piece on the BBC website today. Looks as of there’ll be some restoration of glazing etc but the result will be nearer the Halifax.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-27768464
I have no problem with the reconstruction of any missing sections such as the glazing as without such significant parts the character of the aircraft is reduced, especially to those people who are unaware of what it looked like when it was complete. When pottery and earthenware fragments are displayed in museums it is common practice to reconstruct the missing sections of the original item, so that one can fully appreciate the the scale and shape of the whole vessel, the same should be done with any missing parts of the Dornier.
Richard
The Profile publication No 256 for the Wellesley states that the long range aircraft used the Pegasus XXII of 1,010hp rather than the standard Pegasus XX of 925hp. The cowling was of the N.A.C.A – type long-chord with controllable gills to reduce drag and improve cooling, a Rotol variable pitch propeller in place of de Haviland two pitch type.
The t/o weight was 18,400 pounds which was an overload of 7,900 pounds compared to standard. All militery equipment was removed and a long canopy to provide room for the third crew member (navigator).
One aircraft (K7772) was used as a flying test bed for the Bristol HE15 Hercules, illustrated with a yellow underside.
Richard
OG
Some discussion on this subject in the past here http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?86731-Dan-Air-Heron-1B-G-AOZM
Richard
Lazy8
Its a bellenca.
http://www.airplanesandrockets.com/airplanes/bellanca-irish-swoop-aug-1972-aam.htm
Richard
In a list of trials Comets, published in Aviation News September 1993, it simply says XM829 to A@AEE for Decca/Decra trials, retired to the Stansted Fire school 20.02.64. Burnt mid 70.
Sorry no picture, which is something I realise is a common problem with RAE/A@AEE aircraft from that era. I wonder if official photos are held somewhere, would that be Kew, because security seems to have prevented much private photography.
Richard
Update:
Feeling a bit battered and bruised but no lasting damage to me. Neck, chest, spine and pelvis all X-rayed and clear.
I won’t be spending a lot of time at the computer today, standing is more comfortable than sitting.
Two things annoy me (apart from the loss of what was actually a historic RV4 – First customer-built 4 to fly. First RV4 in the UK)
1) They wouldn’t send the air ambulance for me. You think they’d look after their own. 😡
2) It’s almost certainly the end of its ‘unique’ registration
More in a day or two. And again thanks for all the good wishes, especially from those who I have occasionally not seen eye-to-eye with in the past. It really is ‘just a forum’
Moggy
Sorry to hear about your incident, and glad your on the mend.
I guess we should start a thread with the aim of finding you another ‘suitable’ registration. Second thoughts that might need moderating.
Richard
What did the R Robert team at Brookland use for their non – flying restoration?
Moggy
Good point, I dont know. Perhaps the lengths of frame are easier to form than I thought, perhaps by using adjustable rollers but you would still need a template for each bit.
Richard
Sorry to put a damper on these pipe dreams but I believe the geodetic construction method used on the Wellington was extremely dependant on a huge resource of forming tools and jigs, each single length of lattice frame needed it own fixture to produce the correct curveture, not a real issue when the investment is recovered in building hundreds but for one it would be unviable.
An Albamarle would be easier exept most would mistake it for a B-25.
Richard