dark light

pogno

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 1,010 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: D DAY Air Traffic Control #805290
    pogno
    Participant

    Somewhere I have seen diagrams depicting corridors for the out and return journey, the various elements then used different heights and timings for separation, I suspect it was no more controlled then that.
    You will find this interesting from the Melvern Site https://mraths.org.uk/?page_id=84 the unbelievable determination and bravery described here that happened on OMAHA and GOLD beaches https://mraths.org.uk/?page_id=2838

    Richard

    pogno
    Participant

    I have a distant memory of a F104 on display, possibly in the uk, that had its nose radome stolen, or was that just in a dream.

    As I wrote that I suddenly had another thought that it was possibly the Lasham F104, where did that go.

    Richard

    in reply to: WW2 German aircraft crash Blandford St.Mary, Dorset #809448
    pogno
    Participant

    Dave
    Nearest I can find at the moment is this one at Sturminster Marshall He 111H-3, 1G+AC of Stab.II/KG 27 Shot down returning from a mission to Bristol Docks (possibly intercepted at 00.19 hrs by a Hurricane of 87 Squadron). Crew all baled out. Aircraft crashed 02.00 hrs at Sturminster Marshall, near Wimborne, Dorset.
    From this site http://humanities.uwe.ac.uk/bhr/Main/ww2/8.htm

    Richard

    in reply to: what happened to it? #809879
    pogno
    Participant

    Its alive and well living at the Fleet Air Arm Museum.
    http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/swift/survivor.php?id=8

    Richard

    in reply to: Rare find.. or maybe not? #810661
    pogno
    Participant

    Back in the 1980’s I worked for a organisation that was contracted to maintain some foreign registered executive BAe 1-11 srs400, they had all been around a bit so when we started doing the heavy maintenance we found a few odd repairs, illegal mods, lax maintenance and wrong parts installed. Among the components removed were the Oxygen bottles and these were sent to a workshop for hydrostatic testing and inspection where they looked for internal corrosion, occasionally a bottle would be scrapped for that reason but ultimately they all had a scrap life of 25 years so any getting close to 25 years were also scrapped, one of the three removed from one of these 1-11’s was date stamped 1944, I would have loved to know where it had been during its life and what aircraft types it had been fitted to.

    Richard

    in reply to: Hawker Heron G-EBYC #813998
    pogno
    Participant

    RAF Akerman Street, named after the Roman Road it sits astride of, is located only two miles from Minster Lovell in a North Easterly direction, the airfield closed operationally in 1947 but its buildings may have been used for storage until a later date.
    An airfield named after an ancient road rather than the nearest Town/Village/City is unusual, perhaps it was known as Minster Lovell airfield by those who had to find it on a map.
    http://www.abct.org.uk/airfields/air…treet-crawley/

    Richard

    in reply to: Seen On Ebay 2019 #817309
    pogno
    Participant

    Also not E-bay but these Vimy wheels look interesting, especially with the tyres still fairly intact. I cannot seem to link it directly but they are on page 5 item 280.

    http://www.jacobsandhunt.com/catalogues/

    Richard

    pogno
    Participant

    Thank you Nicko for answering that, very interesting. I find the subcontract building of Mosquito’s in Oz and Canada fascinating, the short time scales in which it was done was simply amazing.

    Richard

    pogno
    Participant

    Interesting document. I am puzzled about what is going on here, MM141 was a Hatfield built aircraft that was written off in a landing accident in the UK at RAF Warboys on 30 Sept 1944, it ran into a ditch, so the undamaged wing may have been salvaged and used for destructive testing. https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/wiki.php?id=155251
    Australian production was delayed around the middle of 1944 following wing failure of an Oz built aircraft A52-12, and the first 50 wings produced needed modification, therefore it seems logical that any investigation into that failure would have used an Oz built wing. .
    Or is it that data from tests, done in the UK on the MM141 wing were being used as a comparison for duplicate tests done on an Oz built wing for way of a comparison.

    Richard

    in reply to: Scuttled Flying Boats #820777
    pogno
    Participant

    Michel
    I think clues in the video suggest it is a Sunderland, five port hole windows and flat panels for flight deck glazing are visible, Sandringham’s had curved flight deck screens and four port holes, it also appears to have a glazed tail turret, Sandringhams had a streamlined fairing where the turret had been.

    Richard

    in reply to: What was the first "Wet Wing" aircraft? #821003
    pogno
    Participant

    Hi Vultee

    Does your username indicate some knowledge of that companies aviation products, because you probably already know that the Vultee BT-13/BT-15 has a wet wing, the function and issues of which are described in this Youtube clip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRFcIzcQsUs
    I have a nagging thought that something in the late 1920’s had a wet wing, possibly a racer, cannot think what though.

    Richard

    in reply to: Fairey Gannet XT752 Takes To The Skies……….AGAIN! #821489
    pogno
    Participant

    The Gannet went home courtesy of a ride in a AN124 and has been active since, the lost spares became a legal dispute with the court ruling here http://www.globalaviationresource.com/v2/2014/07/01/aviation-news-court-ruling-on-fairey-gannet-xt752/
    with more info on PPRUNE http://www.pprune.org/military-aviation/545415-airworthy-gannet-oshkosh-2014-a.html

    Richard

    in reply to: Casa G-AWHB – any news? #822324
    pogno
    Participant

    Two went to the USA, both routed via Blackbushe 1977 ish, the first had been Franco’s personal aircraft with extra passenger windows installed and the gun positions deleted, it became part of the Commemorative Air force and they flew it until 2003 when it crashed and was destroyed unfortunately taking the lives of the two crew.
    The second one followed also through Blackbushe and is now owned by the Cavanaugh Flight Museum, I did think it was potentially airworthy but the museum policy was not to fly it, see https://cavflight.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=60&Itemid=119 if you read the history of that one it states it was one of the aircraft used in the making of the BoB film in 1968 and then continued in Spanish service until 1975, I didnt realise they continued in use after the filming.
    Sadly a third aircraft was the one that crashed on its delivery flight from Spain to the UK taking the lives of Neil Williams, his wife and his engineer.

    Richard

    in reply to: Channel Recoveries #828859
    pogno
    Participant

    JB Wrote ‘ I believe the Hurricane and Dominie have this type of construction, as well as many light aircraft types.’
    Yes the Hurricane has a fabricated substantial steel tube fuselage and centre section with aluminium wings, and you are right many light aircraft also have welded steel tube fuselages, Tiger Moths, Auster’s, Cub’s for example, although in a lighter form to the Hurricane’s, but mostly with wooden wings. The Norseman and Anson were also built like this. The Dominie on the other hand was an all wood ply box fuselage with wooden wings, the only steel was used for fittings and engine mounts.

    The Wessex Archaeology underwater film does look very much as if it is a B24 which was an all metal airframe with very little fabric covering just the flying control surfaces.
    In that film at 0:23 an engine appears which has been reduced to just its high strength/stainless steel components, cylinder liners, firewall and exhaust collector ring, all the aluminium has gone. High strength steel can last well in salt water.
    At 0:40 another engine appears in a similar state but this one is lying in front of its tubular engine bearer frame, this is a mild steel welded structure that I would have expected to have rusted away in sea water, but it obviously this has survived.
    Then at 3:07 a prop hub, blade and a engine nose case appears followed by a section in monochrome that shows what is captioned as ‘Fabric around the main Hull’ and the ‘Hull of the bomber’ but as only the control surfaces were fabric covered makes me wonder if this is something else. One possibility I put forward is that it is a decomposing rubber fuel cell, the B24 had these spaced out all along the wing.

    Richard

    in reply to: Whitley Parts #833387
    pogno
    Participant

    Nicko
    I think Sunderlands and Sandringham used Exactor controls.

    Richard

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 1,010 total)