Various aircraft bits in this auction, not Lynx though as far as I can see.
http://nobby.hattrickmedia.co.uk/t/r…kt-hkbnjrui-j/
Richard
Simon
Think the camera ship was a Anson.
Richard
Hopefully a trend here, the Walrus was once a caravan and the airworthy Blenheim nose was a car!
Werk looks like 310185 which falls in a batch of HE219 serials.
Fantastic, clipped wings and all, just ten years to wait with a bit of hard use to get the patination back to how it was. My favourite aeroplane.
Richard
I noticed this short clip about Elsie MacGill and CCF Hurricane production.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WZoulEgf348
In it mentions the aircraft being fitted with de-icing mods to enable operations in cold weather, never heard of this before but in theory possible I guess by ducting heat from the glycol or engine oil rads into the wing leading edge structure.
Richard
I was surprised recently to see that the US Army Parachute display team is still using two F-27’s or C-31a’s as their jump aircraft, they replaced Caribou in 1985, so support for the Dart is still possible, and a few 748’s are still flying with Darts.
http://aviationweek.com/blog/flying-armys-golden-knights
The big problem with the Viscount is that it wasn’t a fail-safe airframe which means the wing and tailplane spars were flying hour limited and had to be replaced when that time was reached, most surviving airframes will have probably used up that life and thats why they were retired, but who knows whats out there.
Richard
Linking air-frame overhaul life to engine life is probably unlikely as engines were subject to life extensions as operational knowledge was acquired and reliability improvements made. According to one of the Rolls-Royce Heritage Trust booklets, Merlin’s fitted to fighters went from 240 to 300 hrs, twins up to 360. Bombers 300 hrs extended to 420 on the Merlin 24 but the earlier marks stayed at 360. Transport wartime Merlin’s reached 480 to 500 hours.
Richard
Two seat Spitfires all have the front cockpit moved forward before adding the rear seat, done to help the CofG but two seat Hurricanes do not appear to be so modified, will getting the CofG into acceptable limits be a problem. The Shuttleworth Sea Hurri did, I seem to remember, caused by the weight of the hook.
Richard
As Rocketeer has said these are the plates that would have been attached to a component, they give the manufacturers part number, the items serial number and the modification state of the specific part. The type of component they would have been attached to would be something that could be removed and replaced such as all the flying controls, engines, undercarriage, doors, pumps, props etc.
Once removed the item would have been sent to a workshop for assessment and then either repaired and returned to the stores for reissue (possibly back to the aircraft it came from) or scrapped, that repair cycle could happen any number of times.
Only if the item was in some way specific to a particular aircraft would the registration possibly be shown on the plate, an example might be a door that had been trimmed and altered to fit a specific aircraft, possibly due to that airframe differing from standard.
Richard
Taxying with the engine off does seem a bit of a risk for several reasons, as already mentioned, another is that you have lost the ability to give a blast of power and a boot full of rudder to make a turn.
Also people cannot hear you coming, perhaps unlikely on a noisy ramp but possible. Many many moons ago at LHR I was working on the ramp when I heard a squeak, squeak, squeak and looking up the LHR/LGW shuttle BN Islander was taxying towards me and its parking slot with both engines stopped, the only sound was its squeaky brakes.
Richard
This US supplier has a stock in different sizes and material http://www.hansonrivet.com/rivets/blind-pop-advel-rivets/closed-end-blind-rivets/ I assume you require aluminium mandrels if you plan on milling the heads.
Dessouter make a range of rivet shavers.
Richard
The upper image is certainly a Junkers JU86.
Some JU86’s had short rudder trim tabs and some the longer ones as shown here, this I thought might define a particular mark/variant but that appears to be not possible as the long and short tabs seem to have been fitted at random.
Richard
Its also on Ebay http://www.ebay.com/itm/Gnome-Rhone-160-HP-ROTARY-engine-w-accesories-w-propeller-w-spares/292334669703?hash=item4410810f87:g:MqgAAOSw-xVaDuuu&vxp=mtr with additional photos and a price of $45,000.00 located in USA/Argentina!
Richard
Ian
Impressive but I suspect the image is upside down, the photo ship looks to be a C82/C119.
Richard