Hire of aircraft and yourself
Fleet16b,
Best advice I can give re your aircraft, have an hour rate for flying as well as a daily rate for having the aircraft available. This becomes an honest and accurate rate for the use of your aircraft.
Now,a couple of points far greater importantance.
If you are approached for film work, make sure your insurance company clearly understands what you intend doing. You may require a representitive from your insurers to be in attendence during filming, ensuring you and your aircraft are covered for each and every shot. There will most likely be a large loading on your insurance. Make sure your quote to the film company takes this into account.
If you intend charging for your flying, you must have a Commercial Pilots Licence or ATPL. If you don’t, the CAA prosecution department WILL get you.
It can be a very interesting and rewarding time, but be very aware and astute, and never let your aircraft out of your site. Research what happened to the Avro Arrow replica’s. Your personal property is considered to be fair game and completely disposable if it makes a better shot.
And finally remember,
When dealing with the film industry, the goalposts are permanently mobile. What you are initially approached about will bear no resemblance to what the director actually asks you to finally do.
camlobe
Blind landing Varsity
Maybe someone here can help. A long time ago, whilst I was still in a blue suit, I can remember reading an article in Air Clues. Unfortunately, the grey matter is going south and I cannot remember the details accurately, hence the request for help.
As best as I can remember:
Crew flying to Boscome (?) in really grotty weather. You know the stuff. Low cloud, heavy rain, nil viz. Listening to Boscome. One aircraft in the circuit. Tower asking the circuit traffic about conditions. Circuit traffic replies describing near fantastic conditions. Crew trying to look out windscreen can’t believe what they are hearing. What fortunate luck. Crew continues to Boscome, still listening to happy circuit traffic. Crew are unable to appreciate the fantastic conditions as they are unable to see past the nose of their aircraft.
Crew eventually manage to land after the most dreadful approach conditions with no viz. Baffled crew curse the loonies in the circuit and watch it land, to be confronted by a Varsity emblazoned with ‘BLIND LANDING EXPEREMENTAL UNIT.
camlobe
Did well again this year. Another toolbox from daughter and her boyfriend, complete with tools, and an alarm clock from an American friend and his wife. Nice clock. Made by Trintec of Ajax, Ontario and looks like a VOR display. Nice.
camlobe
September 30th, 1958 – me.
camlobe
Hi folks.
Sorry for not responding earlier. Been a bit busy this year, both here and across the pond. Added to work, there has been the pleasure of helping the team save the Prince, and helping a friend recover a T28A from California to Florida (Just missed the minor earthquake and the fires in California, and hurricane Noel in Florida. Blast. Maybe next time).
Other than a bit of a cleanup and a review of condition and remaining systems, I haven’t had a chance to do anything else to the poor old girl yet. Damn EASA.
With regard to Mr Rusty’s last flight, I was fortunate enough to be on the second kite. Luckly, I don’t see my ugly mug spoiling the photo’s above.
pagen01’s pic of Mr Rusty on the fire dump sans engines looks exactly how sad WL754 looked at Valley many years ago before they blew the legs off and torched the rest. A very indignant end to a worthy o’le grey lady.
adrian_grey, got any bits left? Could do with Mr Rusty’s bomb aimers window etc, etc. Please?
camlobe
IIRC, there is one particularly important part of the Nimrod AEW project that flies regularly. The wingtip pods.
Although the whole project was plagued by two specific problems (more further down) these pods were considered ‘worthwhile’. Known as Loreal(?) pods (IIRC after the manufacturer), these RF sensors worked superbly.
Following the announcement of the cancelation of the Nimrod AEW, the pods were removed and latterly placed on the wingtips of the RAF’s E3D’s. For some considerable time the remaining Nimrod airframes remained at Waddo, viewable from the road, pod-less prior to their eventual demise.
Note: because of their placements on the E3D wingtips, the HF aerials are moved inboard from the tip.
The two problems refered to earlier.
The first has already been mentioned earlier. The Nimrod fuselage was critisised by the RAF at the very initial stages of project discussion as being far too small for the planned missions and future equipment upgrades. This critisism never faltered.
The second was the UK governments own fault. GEC Marconi had managed to obtain an ‘open contract’ to supply the radar system. ‘Open contract’ means there is no maximum limit on cost. You won’t get that anywhere else, especially nowadays.
The mainframe computer was a second hand design that was running to full capacity even without fully functioning systems. No allowance or space even for upgrades. The radar cooling systems included passing coolant via pipework through the fuel tanks. This meant that the aircraft would only be able to operate for short missions as far more fuel would have to be retained on-board in order to allow the radar system to be cooled, hence short mission times. Good plan, eh? (was reported at least once to have caught fire – on the ground during test). Syncronisation issues between the front and rear scanners took a looonnnngggg time to rectify. The list goes on and on.
BAe did an excellent job with the airframe, and IIRC, within their allocated budget. The GEC Marconi guys at the coalface did an excellent job of trying to make it work. Unfortunately, due to politics and financial greed, it didn’t stand a chance.
George Younger MP, the (new) Defence Secretary at the time, was probably the first modern British politician to be standing on safe ground when he announced that a British project, Nimrod AEW, was being scrapped and we were buying American, Boeing E3.
The reason for this was, shortly before his announcement, the media had broadcast a couple of in-depth, investigative programmes lambasting GEC Marconi upper management and informing the public about the costs up to date for no performance capability. Costs at the time were in excess of £1 billion. Remember, this was in the late 1980’s.
I seem to remember the GEC Marconi MD was personally interviewed and suffered uncontrolled sweating, fidgitting and redness throughout, whilst being unable to answer simple questions directly. These programmes also left unanswered questions regarding the awarding of an open-ended contract by the government, questions yet to be publicly answered to this day.
The RAF finally got the airframe they wanted. Probably for the first time in recent RAF history, there were no compromises i.e. it cannot be multi-roled, with the exception of medivac.
There is more, much more. But, the rest is history. Maybe another day.
camlobe
Angel of the South
I like the idea.
Well, I like the idea of erecting a Spitfire memorial.
Although personally I would prefer something similiar to the Gloster E28/39 mounted on the roundabout, I would be glad to see a Spitfire themed ‘Angel of the South’ as opposed to some modern, unidentifiable twisted lump of ‘art’.
Just my personal view. Can be shared at no cost.
camlobe
Ian Smith RIP
Another WWII RAF vetran passes. Like the others, he made a valuable and valued contribution in preserving our ‘safe’ society and way of life, almost paying the ultimite price in the process.
I for one would like to express my gratitude for his contributions whilst in RAF uniform, and pass on my condolences to his family and friends at their loss.
camlobe
Queen III AP
Ken.
Sorry I havn’t replied earlier. I was in France yesterday recovering a friends aircraft.
Like John Aeroclub’s manuals, my AP also states the type of propeller is fixed pitch only.
If you would still like to borrow it to photocopy, no problem and no charge. PM your posting details to me.
camlobe
As I look back on the eight and a half years I spent with the best engineering guys in the RAF looking after WL790 and her sisters, I consider what has happened to her since her retirement from front line service in 1991.
My professional and personal appreciation goes to Mike Collet and the team at Air Atlantique, as well as the people in the US for keeping her flying this long. In my humble opinion, she couldn’t ask for a better ‘next stage’ of her life than residing at that well known museum. We all know and accept that she will be cared for by experienced, considerate and well motivated people. The chance for future flight is real, and that will remain in the back of our collective minds.
Thank you all for keeping this ‘Old Grey Lady’ going, and for deciding on this sensible choice for her future.
camlobe
Gipsy Queen Manuals
Hi Ken.
I’ve got a copy of Air Publication 1593C Volume 1 for the Queen III. Let me know if it is of any help.
camlobe
Anyone know what happened to the the XIX’s and the Mk 21’s that were in storage in an old hangar at St Athan in ’95?
The XIX was complete with the heating ducts for the cameras, and IIRC it was on its wheels. The others were, again IIRC with wings off.
Think the two XVI’s that were there as well are the two that went to BBMF.
camlobe
What ever happened to…
…the bomb bay fuel tanks for the Shacks?
Apparently lost within the RAF stores system. Couldn’t be found in ’82.
So, the story goes, no AEW coverage for the Falklands.
However, I’ve never been able to make the maths work.
3284 gallons of Avgas in the wings, plus 400 for the bomb bay tank gives 3684 gallons.
180 ish gallons per hour at economic cruise gives just under 21 hours airborne.
8000 miles (Ascention to FI and return) at 200 ish kts requires 40 hours.
????
One way trip with one hour on task???
Don’t think so.
camlobe
‘Flight of the Mew Gull’ I highly recommend. An excellent read that an aviator (lapsed or otherwise) can appreciate, especially trying to get into the mindset of – no nav aids or GPS. Just accurate dead reckoning.
A word of caution. You could easily become the Christmas bore as no one will see you, glued to the book that you cannot put down.
camlobe
Thread realignment:
Why is my aircraft more unreliable than my 17 year old, 344000 mile Land Rover even though all the aircraft parts, genuine and PMA, cost at least 10 times as much as genuine Land Rover parts???????
AAHHHHHHH
Re-engagement of thread drift:
Does the handrail travel at the same speed as the conveyor?
camlobe