” After all these years that 743 has served at Boscombe, second only to Harvard KF183, I would have hoped that somebody in authority at the airfield, would have had the foresight to have realised that this very important and unique trials aircraft should quite rightly be presented to the excellent BDA Museum at Old Sarum, so that it can preserved inside a hanger for future generations to view.
It has been reported that the aircraft is going to the Boscombe Apprentice School. Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. May I be allowed to look into my crystal ball and predict that in a year to eighteen months time she will be cut about with various panels and installations removed, their destination…….taken home as souveniers or chucked in the scrap bin.
It’s not all doom and gloom though, My crystal ball also reveals that in 4 to 5 years time, some bright spark in authority at Boscombe will realise the importance of the aircraft, and suggest that the remaining carcass of 743 should be donated to the BDA at Old Sarum. By which time of course, as we all know, it will be too late.”
All rather poor and ill-though out comments unfortunately.
The aircraft is being maintained as a first/second-line training aircraft. The electrical/avionics systems integrity is being maintained in a serviceable condition. Airframe systems are not being broken into – only functioned for rigging experience and maintenance of that system. As we own a number of props and engines these are changed on a servicing schedule that aligns, as does the rest of our activities, with national industry standard level three qualifications. Basically the good old Basset provides valuable training for our second year apprentices before they move to placements in the hangars. Check us out.
http://www.besomebody.qinetiq.com/Pages/default.aspx
Scrapping items or taking them home as souvenirs might be how you did your training, it is certainly not how we run one of the best aircraft apprenticeships in the country these days.
Well…. what can i say…. i’ve seen more airborne metal in these photo’s than the whole actual airsho.
.
Inline
Its going to take a lot of persuasion to get the Mrs to another airshow now!:confused:
Bob
Navigation training. The old girl was always thirsty, apparently the tips gave about 25 minutes extra duration. 6 FTS was primarily concerned with Nav training and the JP was used for low level sorties (again a thirsty occupation). Having the tip tanks fitted also removed the need for the nose strakes and other bits that the T.Mk.5s had fitted after trials at Boscombe.
Bob
Now we are talking
David
That sounds interesting. I had wondered if the flight profile was to blame. Can anyone elaborate on high-low-high please?
Bob
Splendid effort so far chaps, thanks for that. However you can see my problem the information is just not out there.
I am sure the fatigue lift usage is key to their demise, however locating the reasons for that is problematic. And I am lothed to commit to print with a reason why if we cannot bottom the problem out.
Any thoughts on how I should approach this?
I would think the story covers something along the lines of;
Bigger engine – heavier aircraft – higher fatigue life usage
Faster type – higher fatigue usage
Higher performance – advanced sortie profile – higher fatigue usage
What do you guys think about this as a credible paragraph?
Bob
Thats interesting. I had found a few references to aircraft coming off the production line straight into storage. Apparently the 52 gave good service where they were deployed. Its the ones in RAF service that are causing me the headache.
Nice picture by the way!
Hi Jetflap,
Thanks for posting that and the slide scans are brilliant.
That is an interesting possibility, of course one problem was the lack of information covering the initial design and production when I was researching. One area that I was a little light on involved the demise of the T.Mk.4. If any one has any info covering that I’m still in the market for it. I am hopeful we are going to re-print soon and I should get the chance to amend some of the lighter areas.
Best wishes
12 Mk.5s! thats practically an airforce by todays standard.
Are you flying any?
What I have are Flight Ref. Cards and the Aircrew manuals, no maintenance orientated pubs unfortunately.
Bob
Hi Chaps
Yes finally after changing publishers half way through the Jet Provost book has been released. A big thank you to all of you that commented or gave stories. Those in print will be getting a signed copy from me. I am waiting for my copies at the moment so I am envious of those who have actually seen the finished article!!!
I take the point of Relightflynn9 that we could have been deeper in most areas but you have to ask yourself where do you stop. I decided that a general overview was required at this point, covering all the JP was about and giving some tech detail to flesh out the stories. I believe other books are under construction (if thats the right term!) on more specialist areas so hopefully within the next few years we should have a full picture. And don’t forget the splendid book on ‘Little Rissie’ covered some of this subject.
Unfortunately XS186 is not in, sorry. Lots of others are though. And one good thing about the publisher change was that we could add the colour section. I hope I got as many different schemes in as was needed.
Not withstanding that I hope you like the book. If you consider any revisions are needed please let me know in case we go to reprint.
Now what to do with all these flight Ref. cards and Aircrew Manuals lying around the place — – – –
Best wishes Bob Clarke
Hi Barry
During your time in the Middle East did you deal with any Strikemasters?
Best wishes
Bill thanks for posting that. Have you anything else you could tell us about the Strikemasters?
Further report
http://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/investigation_reports/2006/AAIR/pdf/aair200605843_IFR.pdf
Best wishes
Bob
Yep Its an Ebay job. I have found over the years that it is an excellant source of original photos. My last book used quite a few off it, especially from the USA.
Incedentally I have discovered that the A/C crashed in 1978 taking the pilot with it. Possibly Lossimouth.
Bob
Driffield and Davidstowe Moor
I think it is now more of a case of ‘fiddling whilst Rome burns’. Driffield may not be a premier site but it is representative of the situation befalling all airfields at present. We will soon be in a situation where very little remains on the landscape to indicate past deeds, and I am not just talking WWII here. Take a look at the evidence for WWI airfields, just a few fragile remnants remain and the majority of those are hangars.
Coming from Scarborough I often think airfields and their current ‘high speed demise’ can be paralleled with the ship building industry. Scarborough, along with the majority of other sea ports once had its own ship building industry, now only demonstrated by the odd sepia photograph. I would like to hope we are not close to that juncture with airfields but fear we might be.
A nice ray of hope. I was at RAF Davidstowe Moor today and spent an interesting afternoon with David Keast who has, with the help of a small band, put together a museum and raised a memorial to the site and its airmen. This I think will be the future for many airfields.
As to Driffield it is not the first and unfortunately will not be the last.
Thank you Ray, that helps me along quite a bit.