dark light

Digger

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 71 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What is this? #1132005
    Digger
    Participant

    Gee this is familier…………….

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=96715

    in reply to: RAAF Museum Biannual Pageant 28 Feb #1115719
    Digger
    Participant

    Sir Richard ‘as me money, so I’ll see you there

    in reply to: Your favourite WWII plane? #1115714
    Digger
    Participant

    I was lucky enough to see a Mosquito fly at Biggin 30 odd years ago, whilst I love the usual BBMF aircraft, I don’t think the Mozzie has an equal.

    Digger

    in reply to: Special arrival at Manston #1091227
    Digger
    Participant

    Chooks

    Are chinooks historic aviation?? as an eaxample.

    Since they were in service when I was and not having worn a uniform for 30years, I would say yes

    Digger
    Participant

    The aircraft that flew was an experimental design and a worthy exercise in aerodynamics. Had the prototype survived I am sure that the people at Farnborough would have gleaned some useful data from it. As stated above, they could not have produced a viable combat aircraft, due to lack of development funds, men and material.

    in reply to: Sitting in Museum Aircraft #883287
    Digger
    Participant

    Classic Jets at Parafield Airport, Adelaide, South Australia have a made up cockpit for the kids and used to allow sitting in the Sea Venom. Occasionally they have open cockpit days where a volunteer will man each aircraft and supervise patrons sitting in them.

    in reply to: Flux Capacitor #918806
    Digger
    Participant

    The Fairey Battle, I would nip back quietly and replace them all with something a bit more capable performance wise, maybe Boston /Havocs. then re-run the ill fated Maastricht raids…

    Wonder what it would have been like if re engine with the Griffon? with nearly twice the horsepower it may have been viable.

    in reply to: Sabre Underwing Stores #899037
    Digger
    Participant

    Certainly, the Australian version carried sidewinders inboard and tanks outboard…………http://www.classicjets.com/collection/c_Sabre.html…………Digger

    in reply to: Reach for the Sky – 2014 version #936486
    Digger
    Participant

    RFTS Telemovie

    And approximately fifteen years too old for the early 1940s part of the movie

    Moggy

    True, but if you shot it this year, he would only be 2 years older than Kenneth Moore was and I reckon he looks younger.
    With the Harry Potter films finished what about Daniel Radcliff, Rupert Grint or Tom Felton, they’re all pretty good and would fit the age.

    in reply to: Reach for the Sky – 2014 version #937127
    Digger
    Participant

    Getting back to RFTS, it could be made as a telemovie, purchase footage from BofB, Dark Blue World, etc . Re shoot training scenes and “Paintbox” the original Hurricane aerobatics (because nobody would throw one about like that anymore).
    There are plenty of good actors out there, John Simm (Life on Mars) is about the right stature.

    in reply to: Moorabbin Air Museum, Australia – new management and more #953621
    Digger
    Participant

    Glad to hear all is well. Enjoyed my visit in 2009, must get over to Melbourne again soon……….Digger

    in reply to: We will remember them #981399
    Digger
    Participant

    It’s very good.
    Who wrote this?
    I think many RSL members in Australia would share this sentiment, as well…………….Digger

    in reply to: Aviation filming at Top Gear test track #1004497
    Digger
    Participant

    Casino Royale.

    Ahh, thanks, must admit I was a bit “tired and emotional” when I saw Casino Royale, must watch it again………

    in reply to: Aviation filming at Top Gear test track #1005937
    Digger
    Participant

    Half the fun of watching is to see what’s on the airfield. I was intrigued by the 747 having its engines twin podded and replacing the outer engine mounts with slipper tanks. what was that about?

    Digger
    Participant

    Mitsubishi Zero was a fast agile fighter, comparable to spitfire and ME109, but the trade off was no protection of any kind for the pilot and limited armament.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 71 total)