RE: new member wants to share pics
Right. I thought it was a little unusual for a Cessna to be parked behind an A-10…
There’s not a special place for pics as such, by the way. It’s just that an A-10 as a military jet is better placed on the Airforces Monthly board as that’s where people talk about such things. No big deal though!
RE: Forum Getogether?
I’d like to see Dark Blue World, for sure.
RE: C54s at North Weald
Thanks for posting those. I’d like to get down there and see them myself but that may or may not happen… They are great looking aircraft, for sure.
RE: Forum Getogether?
I’d be up for it. Particularly if it was at Duxford rather than in London.
RE: new member wants to share pics
Well, the beasty above would be a Shackleton. Dead giveaway is the double props.
And your jet here is an A-10 – twin tails and huge cannon on the front! Where was that taken, by the way?
Nice pictures, let’s see more!
RE: Which countries’ pilots made the best airplane noises?
Wheeeeeeiiioooooouuuuuuunnnnnnn! TakatakatakatakatakaBOOM….
..sort o’ thing?
No?
I’ll get me coat 😉
RE: Shuttleworth Pageant pictures
Cool 🙂 I’m glad your friend enjoyed that voicemail.
I just remember watching that Spitfire taking off in a tube of rain. It wasn’t until I got that picture back that I realised the tube was composed of prop-wash trails like that!
RE: Film versus digital
>Futurshox
>Hard disc- not a problem just burn images to CD and index,
>its quicker retrieval than a slide box.
Fair comment.
>Still this is an interesting debate, i note that you had
>scanned at 4000dpi, why when photopaper is optimised for
>300dpi.
Not necessarily true. I have a packet of Epson photo paper sitting next to me that is rated up to 1440 dpi.
If I scan something at 4000 dpi, then by the time I’ve resampled the image to be 8×10 inches printed, the resolution drops to somewhere between 300-600 dpi anyway.
>I need some tuition in what the optimum resolution ,size and
>file type should be for printing purposes. I curently scan
>slides (when my bloody scanner works) at 300dpi and save a
>largish file as a BMP then save a compressed Jpeg version
>for web/ e-mailing purposes.
>Advise please.
I take the view that the scan should be done at a moderately high resolution even for web/email usage. For my website, I usually scan at 300 or 600 dpi, then reduce the image down to 600 pixels wide or so. The reduction in size on the computer gives a smoother image than a straight scan at 100 dpi.
For printing, scan as high a resolution as you can (but don’t bother with interpolation, it’s a little like digital zoom on cameras!) and use your image software (Photoshop or whatever) to resample to the print size you want. Works for me.
RE: Film versus digital
[updated:LAST EDITED ON 08-10-02 AT 06:55Â AM (GMT)]Well, here’s my opinion for the melting pot.
I don’t believe film/slides are dead at all. We’re all talking here about 10-100MB files, for a start. Even given the fact that hard discs are cheaper and bigger all the time, how many of you really want to trust your entire image archive to computer hardware that has a nasty habit of breaking when you most need it? And how much space would you need to store, say, 50,000 images? A box of slides isn’t going anywhere and can be referenced whenever you like.
Of course digital cameras have their place, and I’d like to get a D60 or better at some point in the future. The news reporters I saw at Duxford the other day were all using D60/D30/D1Xs, with a battery of laptops behind them. There are reasons for this as you all know, and fair play, that’s where the world is going in terms of reporting.
For another comparison of film, I can offer the two images below. One is the full frame of the Shuttleworth SE5A, the other is a crop of the full scan at 4000 dpi. Camera was a Canon EOS 1V at 400mm, scanner is a Nikon Super Coolscan 4000. I don’t have a digital version of the shot but it may offer people a useful comparison with Damien’s film image. For the record, it prints very nicely at 8×10 inches (my printer only goes to A4 size).
Edited to add: This would have been on Fuji Superia 400 at 250/s.
Attachments:

RE: Slipstream!!
Mind you, a propellor-driven F1 car might liven things up a bit…!
RE: Connie on the way to Duxford!!!
Blimey Damien, that was quick!
Nice piccies 🙂 Good to meet you, too.
The Connie started her engines dead on 16:30 and took off a few minutes afterwards, and did one of those steep-turn banking flypasts we usually only dream of! Now she is probably landed already in Manston, or nearly so.
RE: North Weald. What’s the chance of an airshow?
Bedsheet Bomber is still there, although looking somewhat the worse for wear. Couldn’t tell you about the others for sure though, although I think there is a Meteor airframe next to one of the hangars.
RE: Connie visits Duxford today
No worries Damien 🙂 Hopefully it (and me) will be at Duxford tomorrow…
RogerS, no idea why it’s returned to Iceland; it’s apparently ‘gone tech’ but to what extent I don’t know.
RE: Connie visits Duxford today
I have just heard that the Connie is stuck in Iceland and will not be at Duxford any earlier than Wednesday now.
RE: Connie visits Duxford today
Thanks 🙂