dark light

schurem

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 274 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2082842
    schurem
    Participant

    Thats a good looking machine. I wonder, is the engine in it any good? What sort of thrust to weight ratio does it have? Why hasn’t it been exported?

    in reply to: Oct/Nov/Dec 2019: the new forum lay-out… #2085530
    schurem
    Participant

    Layout seems somewhat improved. Still suboptimal. About a third of width is wasted on my device on margins around user portraits.

    in reply to: Chinese air power thread 18 #2085694
    schurem
    Participant

    Interesting pics, very interesting! Please do keep ’em coming 🙂

    in reply to: Oct/Nov/Dec 2019: the new forum lay-out… #2085866
    schurem
    Participant

    I agree with *both* the above posters.

    While the old one was a bit of a dinosaur, and had to go, this one needs work.

    It does waste screen space in a horrible manner on a regular windows chrome browser, taking far too much room for looking nice and far too little for the content we come for, the words!

    I’m certain you guys at key.aero won’t just leave it as is, and I see a lot of potential in this upgrade, so keep at it lads!

    in reply to: Su-57 News and Discussion -version_we_lost_count!- #2095507
    schurem
    Participant

    Oh that’s hilarious. Google image search “HOTAS Warthog”. The stick displayed next to that screen is an American made game peripheral. Even more hilarious is the fact that that used to be the top-end very best stick on the market until… A couple Russian companies (VKB and VirPil) put even better sticks on the market. XaXaXa!

    The screen behind it is displaying a still from DCS, a flight simulation game built in Moscow by a company that is truly international.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2134928
    schurem
    Participant

    Ugh Tejas is not looking any prettier these days. What a lumpy and bumpy line 🙁

    in reply to: unit cost of F-16 A/C and Mig-23ML in 1990 #2138909
    schurem
    Participant

    More like 5 or 6 if the Soviet Politbureau sufficiently likes you, your cause and your chances to put a spanner in the international imperialist capitalist machinery 😀 And like the Man said; quantity has a quality all of its own. 12 floggers tag teaming a pair of vipers would probably not end well for the vipers. Especially if they don’t rock AMRAAM.

    in reply to: Why did some military aviation slang go mainstream ? #2139241
    schurem
    Participant

    I didnt even know ‘balls to the wall’ was millitary slang. Wall-to-wall counseling on the other hand….

    in reply to: Why did some military aviation slang go mainstream ? #2139401
    schurem
    Participant

    Must have something to do with the 21st century post 911 american cultural trend of militarism; games like call of duty and countless movies that have tacticool heroes with all their tacticool gear speaking tacticool lingo and pwning bishes left and right.

    schurem
    Participant

    oh i’m quite sorry sir if my futile attempt at fighter jock cool fell utterly flat for you. I have edited my posts right away.

    schurem
    Participant

    Excellent post. Have a cookie 😀

    I still stand by my assessment of the F-5 as the superior of the mentioned planes. While the F-104 might be great at boom & zoom, there are too many situations where that just won’t work.

    schurem
    Participant

    I’d say the F-5 from those four.

    The MiG-19 is awesome but needs new engines after about 250 to 300 hours.

    The F-8 is a great plane but big, smoky and complicated.

    The F-104 also is small and fast and has the roll rate of a sidewinder but it does not want a sustained turn of any kind.

    The F-5 on the other hand has LERXes, sweet little engines that kept on going, good visibility and is also agile as a cat in a corner. Being small is a quality all of its own. Makes you hard to acquire and track visually. F-5 wins this little contest hands-down.

    in reply to: unit cost of F-16 A/C and Mig-23ML in 1990 #2139700
    schurem
    Participant

    I been reading Red Eagles, about the secret squadron if MiG’s that the USAF had squirreled away at Tonopah. They consistently bemoan the -23’s horrible, terrible, awful flying qualities. They absolutely dreaded flying that thing in anything but a fast, straight line.

    in reply to: unit cost of F-16 A/C and Mig-23ML in 1990 #2139856
    schurem
    Participant

    He wants the vipers to win decisively in a very target-rich environment.

    in reply to: Military Aviation News #2140680
    schurem
    Participant

    No more news? 🙁

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 274 total)