dark light

Wanshan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2044520
    Wanshan
    Participant

    What do you mean not built yet , please read it once again

    The first two of the frigate is launched and is being fitted out , the third was launched in June 2008 , so obviously they are reffering to problems with first frigate

    Any way i have confirmed with some other source and indeed they are negotiating for additional Krivaks

    If you have source material on another order of Talwars (i.e. ships 7 through 9) by all means please do post.

    Russia and India are negotiating a new contract on the delivery of additional Project 11356 frigates for the Indian navy, the head of Russia’s arms exporter said on Wednesday.

    The talks are being held despite disruptions in the construction of the ships.

    That is: new contract for ships currently being built. Much like the GOrshkov situation.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2044531
    Wanshan
    Participant

    To Quote

    Unless “an additona”l order does not translate to more number , can you explain your POV ?

    “It took some time to deal with the problems. After additional work and testing were carried out, there were no complaints with regard to the frigate. Moreover, talks are being held for an additional order of this type of combat vessel,” Isaikin said.

    The next line : “The official said most of the problems were related to advanced weaponry and electronics installed on the frigates to meet the requirements of the Indian navy.” You cannot have these problems and test ships that have not been built yet, or that are still building. Therefor, this remark is in relation to integration problems that occurred with the first batch of three ships (Talwar and het sisters). So, the additional order relates to the second batch now under construction.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2044793
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Source ?

    No source needed, just READ the article

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2044986
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Russia may build more Krivak class frigates for India

    MOSCOW, February 4 (RIA Novosti) – Russia and India are negotiating a new contract on the delivery of additional Project 11356 frigates for the Indian navy, the head of Russia’s arms exporter said on Wednesday.

    The talks are being held despite disruptions in the construction of the ships.

    Russia is building three Project 11356 Krivak IV-class guided missile frigates for the Indian navy at the Yantar shipyard in Russia’s Baltic exclave of Kaliningrad under a $1.6 billion contract signed in July, 2006.

    “The contract deadlines are very tough and there were indeed some disruptions in the construction,” Rosoboronexport’s general director Anatoly Isaikin said in an interview with Nezavisimaya Gazeta.

    “It took some time to deal with the problems. After additional work and testing were carried out, there were no complaints with regard to the frigate. Moreover, talks are being held for an additional order of this type of combat vessel,” Isaikin said.

    The official said most of the problems were related to advanced weaponry and electronics installed on the frigates to meet the requirements of the Indian navy.

    A delegation of Indian military officials, led by India’s deputy chief of the naval staff, Vice Adm. Raman P Suthan, visited the Yantar shipyard in October last year and said it was satisfied with the pace and the quality of the construction.

    Russia previously built three Krivak-class frigates – INS Talwar, INS Trishul and INS Tabar – for India, and delivered them all in late 2004.

    The final vessel of the current batch is due to be delivered to India by 2011-12. All of the frigates will be armed with eight BrahMos supersonic anti-ship cruise missile systems and not the Club-N/3M54TE missile system, which was installed on previous frigates.

    The Krivak-class frigate has deadweight of 4,000 metric tons and a speed of 30 knots, and is capable of accomplishing a wide range of maritime missions, primarily hunting down and destroying large surface ships and submarines.

    “In terms of firepower it [the Krivak IV class frigate] has no rivals in the world in its class,” Isaikin said.

    Very misleading article title: they are simply renegotiating the deal for the second 3 Talwar ships (not any further ships)

    in reply to: Royal Navy FSC two tier thing or whatever it is called now #2046487
    Wanshan
    Participant

    But it isn’t “this size of hull”: it’s bigger. Not hugely bigger, but enough to make a difference, I think.

    I’m no naval architect, & my estimates are derived crudely, from looking at ships & their published specifications, but it looks to me as if you can’t get the range, endurance, performance & minimum armament expected in C2 in anything much less than 4000 tons, which is why I cited the FM400. The Dutch OPV might just squeeze in at the bottom of that range. The Formidables are that bit smaller, nearer 3000 than 4000, & can’t do it. Compare them – Dutch OPV about 600 tons heavier, top speed 22 knots vs 27, a crew of 50 vs 85 – and all that without the Aster, Harpoon & torpedo launchers . . .

    I agree, you could modify the Dutch OPV to take the required armament (though I think the bigger Sylvers of the Formidables would be a step too far), at the expense probably of the overload personnel transport capability (extra crew, a bit less space), & adding a little – but easily supportable – weight. You end up with a ship 20-25% heavier than a Formidable (pushing 4000 tons), & still less heavily armed & slower. You see what I’m getting at? You have just, rather nicely, proved my point! You have defined a ship which might meet the requirement, and it’s on my side of the minimum size divide. 😀

    Let us go the other way, & consider how to modify a Formidable to give it the needed range & endurance, without increasing size. I think you end up with something too lightly armed, & probably slower – a Floreal!

    BTW, I think the C3 you refer to is not the one the Admiralty have in mind, which is smaller & more lightly armed than what you – and many others, think of as C3. I think the VT proposal has been rather too influential.

    4000 tons eh? Anyone considered the USCG National Security Cutter (NSC) as a basis?
    http://www.icgsdeepwater.com/objectives/cutters/NSC.php
    http://www.icgsdeepwater.com/img/concepts/MAR07/NSC_SpecSheet.pdf

    Or the somewhat smaller 2900tn Offshore Patrol Cutter (OPC)
    http://www.icgsdeepwater.com/objectives/cutters/OPC.php
    http://www.icgsdeepwater.com/img/concepts/MAR05/ICGS_OPC.pdf

    Some reads on the Dutch patrol ship
    http://publishing.yudu.com/Apnqm/WTJul-Aug08/resources/20.htm
    http://publishing.yudu.com/Ab9xx/WTMay08/resources/34.htm

    Some reading on a reconfigurable warship
    http://publishing.yudu.com/Ab1hd/WTJan08/resources/35.htm

    Wanshan
    Participant

    With all due respect I suggest you do some homework: For all the conflicts since the end of WWII (Korea, Vietnam, Middle-East, Indian subcontinent etc.) count the total number of US made aircraft shot down by Soviet/Russians made weapons. Then compare it with the total number of Soviet/Russian made aircraft shot down by US made weaponry.

    …and then rethink about the claim you made.

    That can be a very deceiving statistic. It may just mean be that more US made aircraft were hurled at Soviet/Russian weapons than vice versa > More opportunities to get shot. Which is not a totally unreasonable assumption as the US approach since WW2 has been to gain air superiority and strike by air, before putting in troops on the ground – if at all. Or possibly due to weak or absent of opposing air force (maily losses to ground fire/SAMs?).

    in reply to: Iran completes design phase of stealth aircraft #2476936
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Iran completes design phase of stealth aircraft
    Tehran Times Political Desk

    TEHRAN — Iran has completed the design phase of its stealth aircraft, the commander of the Iranian Air Force announced here on Sunday.

    Iranian military researchers are now working on building small prototypes of the aircraft, Brigadier General Hassan Shah-Safi told reporters in Tehran.

    The preliminary stages will be finished in late March and then production will begin, he stated.

    Iranian engineers have made a major breakthrough in designing stealth aircraft that are difficult to detect by radar.

    Shah-Safi said that the Air Force has also tested a new air-to-air heat-seeking missile manufactured by the Iranian military.

    The new missile, which has a range of 100 kilometers, will be mass-produced by the Ministry of Defense, he added

    http://www.tehrantimes.com/index_View.asp?code=187752

    Is this really going to be a proper stealth aircraft?

    Probably not. Might be referring to Shafagh/Shafaq LCA a.k.a. russian Vitiazh 2000 a.k.a. Iranian M-ATF

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world #2047497
    Wanshan
    Participant

    It was a cheap small-sized vessel designed in the late 60s / early 70’s, for ASW duties to protect the French SSBN while leaving their port. 17 were built and 10 a still in service

    They eventually proved very useful as high seas patrol vessels to monitor the French overseas territories and the 10 remaining are to be re-equipped as OPV despite being out of age…

    Here’s a Wiki article:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%27Estienne_d%27Orves_class

    SOuth Africa also used three, (some of?) which if later off-loaded to Argentina, which still operates them (used them in Falklands/Malvinas was too IIRC).

    in reply to: Karel Doorman Frigates to Portugal? #2047755
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Splendid little ships, aren’t they?

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world #2047965
    Wanshan
    Participant

    If, its a counter to the Bruke Class. Its primary mission wouldn’t be ASW…:confused:

    Udaloy class from conception was ASW oriented, complemented by Sovremenny’s in AShW role. Adm Chabanenko is a modified Udaloy (Udaloy II): it has the twin 130mm of the Sovremenny in place of 2 single 100mm and it has the same antiship missiles as Sovremenny, rather than the ASW-missile (with secondary antiship capability) missiles that the Udaloys originally carry. So, Chabanenko is an ASW-design turned multirole.

    in reply to: Congrats Wanshan #2048157
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Drinks, burps and farts more than his old man….good grief!
    http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/371/baby9xz.jpg

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2048163
    Wanshan
    Participant

    If a 533mm tube can be retrofitted to fire 650mm weapons, the same can be done to a 650mm tube. I would assume this is some kind of modification to fire a larger diameter weapon.

    Never heard of anything like this before. You’ld essentially would have to replace the entire tube with a bigger one.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2048166
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Onix’s diameter is over 650mm, around 700 mm so it’s psysically impossiple it to be fired on any TT in any submarine. So you can drop that arguing out. And again and again if wikipedia or some other western (read english language) site gives some “data” on some russian or soviet system which is based on estimation, don’t get too hanged upon it.

    Unless a hull plug is installed with VL tubes.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2048700
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Here’s a *superb* video of Chabanenko on exercise which was posted on another forum:

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=3e8_1230875692

    You’ll see basically every single weapons system onboard in action, with the exception of the Klinok SAM and the Udav rocket launcher. AK-130, Vodopad (awesome sight, that one!), decoy rockets, Kashtan… the lot 😀 I believe sferrin was looking for footage of Sunburn launches, well look no further!

    Brilliant video. Magnificient ships, the Udaloys, in both I & II versions. Hope something along the lines of a much more modern III may oneday emerge.

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world #2049167
    Wanshan
    Participant

    The ships, measuring 40 meters in length and 7.3 meters wide, were each equipped with a radar system, a twin-barreled cannon and two 12.7 mm machine guns, he said. Each had a maximum speed of 25 knots per hour.
    http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/news/national/article/5547.html

    http://foto.detik.com/images/content/2009/01/07/464/kapal06.jpg

    I would really like to find out more about that twin barrelled gun. Info anyone?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,906 through 1,920 (of 3,544 total)