If you do that, then there will not be new jobs in US or Russia defence industry, which will be outrageous:rolleyes:
You better get the most important priorities straighten up…:(
Not to mention payment in oil?
Hmm, does seem strange the integration is not taking place @ the warship’s construction site.
I was under impression though that Barak will be fitted in India.
Any news on Teg’s Barak integration?
The guidance radars for Barak are not fitted either it seems….
I don’t see where/how the radar directors for Barak could be fitted and am not expecting Barak to appear at all. Given the installations on destroyers, I don’t thinkg Orekh or MR-123 can/do work with Barak.

Indians decided to go with AK + Barak combo.
So, where’s the Barak on the latest 11356s?
Didn’t the Kashtan fall out of favour with the Indian navy.
Also on the Russian 11356’s: only AK630

Kamov Ka-104 Hummingbird (png by Igor Kutuzov)
http://igorkutuzov.deviantart.com/art/Kamov-Ka-104-Hummingbird-136759735
:diablo:

http://www.jetfly.hu/rovatok/jetfly/hirek/hatalmas_helikopterek_epulhetnek/
Why no more Kashtan, just ‘old’ AK 630s?
WZ-19?
Kazan Ansat-2RC?
PZL W-3PL?
056 goes on sea trials
China can now make stealth ships as best with other countries.
stealthier compare to this..
I agree with TR-1 and Jonesy, plus compare to Soobrazitelny rather than Stereguschy

Silly, the article says
They are also equipped with a 100-mm gun, a Shtil surface-to-air missile system, two Kashtan air-defense gun/missile systems, two twin 533-mm torpedo launchers, and an antisubmarine warfare (ASW) helicopter.
but, as the pic shows, these has 2x AK630 and no Kashtan.

Rooivalk has to work hard to maintain its lack of sales!
Indeed Iraq could get more Mi-17 and Mi-24 but it appears to be a political issue in Iraq about getting a new generation attack helicopter.
Super Hind Mk 4 and Mi-17 upgrade ? Puts South Africa back in the middle of the game. Capitalized on earlier experience with the type(s).
https://sites.google.com/site/stingraysheligalleries/south-africa-s-ate-superhind-series-mk-2-mk-3-mk-4-and-mk-5
.jpg)

That is a nice photo of Kuznetsov and he does look to be a lighter shade of grey. Maybe the sun was shining on him when he had his photo taken …
All Russian Naval vessels are masculine and are correctly referred to as ‘He’.
Unless neutered (like e.g. OH Perry class), then correct reference would be ‘it’ … :diablo:
Between 25 and 30 OHP remain in USN active service (of 51 built for the USN).
45 SM1 ships:
Bahrain 1
Chili, Italy, Japan, Poland, each 2
Egypt 4
Spain 6
Turkey, 8
Taiwan 8+8
Counting these nations initial stock plus whatever USN SM1 stock should be a fair supply of missiles. Several export customers are paying to have their SM-1MR rebuilt with new motors and the decomissioned SM-1MR from the USN are likely to be sold to export customers.
The SM-1MR Block V was designated RIM-66B, because it introduced more significant changes. It had a new plane-scanning seeker, a faster-reacting autopilot, a new MK 90 blast-fragmentation warhead, and a new Aerojet MK 56 dual-thrust rocket motor. The latter increased missile length by 25 cm (10 in), and increased range and ceiling by about 45 percent and 25 percent, respectively.
The final SM-1MR version was the Block VI, designated RIM-66E (RIM-66C/D versions are SM-2, see below). The RIM-66E featured the monopulse seeker of the SM-2, and a new MK 45 MOD 4 proximity fuze (also known as TDD – Target Detection Device). Production began in 1980, and the RIM-66E entered service in 1983. It is still in production for export customers. The subvariants of Block VI include RIM-66E-1/3/7/8 (-3/8 have the MK 115 warhead of SM-2). Block VI A (RIM-66E-5) and Block VI B (RIM-66E-6) had later MODs (6 and 7, respectively) of the MK 45 fuze for improved performance against low-RCS targets, and both use the MK 115 warhead.
RIM-66A SM-1MR Block I-IV
RIM-66B SM-1MR Block V
RIM-66E SM-1MR Block VI (RIM-66E-1/3/7/8), VIA (RIM-66E-5), VIB (RIM-66E-6)The prime contractor for all Standard missiles has long been Standard Missile Co. (SMCo), a joint venture of Hughes (which had previously acquired General Dynamics Pomona, the original prime contractor), and Raytheon. However, the Hughes missile division has since also been acquired by Raytheon, making Raytheon the sole contractor for Standard. Until 2001, more than 21000 missiles of all versions (including RIM-67 Standard ER) had been built.
http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/m-66.html
Aerojet MK 56 dual-thrust solid-fueled rocket is/was used also on
RIM-66C SM-2MR Block I (Aegis)
RIM-66D SM-2MR Block I (Tartar)
The SM-2 Block I missile is similar to the SM-1 Block V. SM-2MR Block II introduced an improved Thiokol MK 104 rocket motor, to deal with faster and more manoeuverable targets. The Block II missiles was 24 cm longer than its predecessors. I suppose it could be possible to shoehorn the Mk104 into SM-1 if needed (and doubt this would require a new/additional rebuilding facility)
http://rewreward.blogspot.nl/2010/03/rim-6667156300-standard-missile-12345.html
Maybe not for too much longer. This Aus DoD document from the 2000s (p27) discusses SM-1 impending life of type.
http://www.defence.gov.au/ADC/docs/Publications/Monograph%20Series/RMcMillan.pdf
ESSM is a more than capable replacement for SM-1.
Disagree: Clearly SM-1 is reaching the end and ESSM is capable yet not supporting SM1 would leave allied navies (Bahrain, Chili, Egypt, Italy, Japan, Poland, Spain, Taiwan, Turkey, all with 1-8 SM1 equipped ships) hanging. Future OHP recipients may receive the ships without functional Mk13 and may be encouraged to take the Mk41/ESSM route. Some navies (Italy, Japan) operate domestic destroyers with SM1 which, in relativel short term, are likely replaced. However, for other navies (often operating ex-USN OHPs) this is not likely in the near term (e.g. Chili, Egypt, Poland, Taiwan). They will have to soldier on with their ships. Now, they may opt for addition of Mk41 and ESSM, and/or could switch to SM2. But for reasons of budget as well as politics/diplomacy not in any hurry.
http://www.balancer.ru/forum/punbb/attachment.php?item=302950&download=2
Nice photo of Kuznetsov; thanks Snake 😀
Has she been repainted in a lighter shade of grey?
Your poster appaers to be from DSEI 2011
Russian patrol ship unveiled
Richard Scott, Thursday, 15 September, 2011
space and weight margins allow for the installation of additional weapons and systems, such as anti-ship missiles, torpedo launchers and a towed array sonar
Also, from Navy Recognition photo series of Euronaval 2012
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/home/naval-exhibitions-pictures/euronaval-2012.html?AG_MK=0&AG_form_paginInitPages_653=1&AG_form_albumInitFolders_653=west_europe/france/exhibition/euronaval_2012/pictures/Scale%20models&AG_form_scrollTop=912&AG_form_scrollLeft=0&AG_MK=0




There is a coast guard variant of this as well. See elsewhere on this thread:
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showpost.php?p=1733213&postcount=1505
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showpost.php?p=1733456&postcount=1507
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showpost.php?p=1733473&postcount=1510
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showpost.php?p=1736072&postcount=1552