dark light

Wanshan

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 3,544 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: New Orleans tragedy #2079127
    Wanshan
    Participant
    in reply to: How would your mnid-sized navy use this ship? #2079128
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Amazing! It seems that I must actualy know something about ships after all… 😉

    Thanks guys for the wonderful info!

    Regards,

    Hammer

    Some more along these lines here

    in reply to: What's happening in Malaysia??? #2079129
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Are there any pics around of them sitting there?

    Browse around here

    in reply to: Australia and UK DDL proposal #2079242
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I’m sure there were major differences. Still, it isn’t that hard to picture a Type 42 fitted with a US 5″ gun, a mk13 or perhaps even a Mk29 rail lancher forward, radars as in OHP class, including 2 STIR…

    in reply to: What's happening in Malaysia??? #2079278
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Thanks guys, that is a long time for boats to be inactive and that’s not good, personally these two boats would be good as training subs only now.

    Especially if you consider the climate. Deterioration would have been less in Northern Europe, I think.

    in reply to: What's happening in Malaysia??? #2079304
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Jane’s Brief

    Judge orders ex-Dutch subs in Malaysia to be dismantled
    A Dutch court has ordered RDM Technology Holding BV to dismantle two RNLN Zwaardvis-class submarines
    ————————————————————————

    How many are in Malaysia, how long have they been there and what were they doing there in the first place? I thought that all these subs went to Taiwan as Hi Lungs

    And why has a court ruling had to be made on these subs?

    Taiwan ordered and received just 2 SSK from the Netherlands.

    in reply to: Australia and UK DDL proposal #2079308
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Lots of similarity with Type 42 IMHO.

    in reply to: Tankers #2079358
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I wonder if a common hull and propulsion design could be used for both fleet replenishment ships and aircraft carriers?

    When you consider that the Fort Victoria class is larger than the Invincible class I think there would be lots of benefits. The ships could be identical up to the hangar deck and then completed as a carrier or tanker.

    I guess compromises would have to be made but I think it could save a lot of money.

    The Spanish Principe d’Asturias the capability to refuel its escorts (RAS station on the starboard side, just behind the funnel)
    http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/asturias/images/asturias1.jpg

    Same on the Royal Thai Navy’s HTMS Chakri Naruebet (starboard side, just behind the bridge)
    http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/chakrinaruebet/images/thai111.jpg

    in reply to: ID BOMBS/MISSILE ? #2042928
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I think that the one with the red nose plug may be a russian 500kg FAE or else a anti-personnel cluster munition.

    in reply to: Aussie news, nothing much. #2079964
    Wanshan
    Participant

    that’s right wan, if you read carefully I did say that it is a varient of this design.

    … with nearly TWICE the displacement? Is that a variant or a different design? Anyway, would like to see imagery if available!

    in reply to: Tankers #2080259
    Wanshan
    Participant

    What are the primary tankers with USN??

    Fast Combat Support Ship – AOE
    Sacramento AOE 1 – class (only 1 of 4 remaining: CAMDEN AOE 2)
    Supply T-AOE 6 – class (with Military Sealift Command: 4 ships)

    Fleet Oilers – AO
    Henry J. Kaiser T-AO 187 – class (with Military Sealift Command: 16 ships)

    in reply to: Tankers #2080305
    Wanshan
    Participant

    One technical doubt…Does any navy around the world operate tankers able to keep up with its fast combat ships (25-30kts)? Or are tankers for ever doomed to be left behind in war?

    []s Hammer

    IIRC, tankers are not to keep up. The stores ships and replenishment oilers are to shuttle between fleet oilers and fast combat support ships. It’s a chain, with various types having their own place.

    Most USN ships (AOR and AO) do 20 knots max. Only AOE do 26 knots but those are specifically designed with carrier groups in mind.

    in reply to: How would your mnid-sized navy use this ship? #2080312
    Wanshan
    Participant

    In my humble naval ignorance I thought that the bow area could be converted in a Large Hangar for Super Puma sized helos…and a large helipad could be set up there. The mid sections could be converted to personel (marine units) transport while maintaining the container capability abovedeck… Would it make any sense to have large folding floating barges hinged against the sides of the ship in order to simplify loading and unloading while at sea? Away from ports?…

    How much more vulnerable is a civilian converted ship when compared to a dedicated military ship buit from scratch for this purpose? Would you care to dwelve on this issue for a while? What exactly is an AOE? MHCs? T-AKE? 😉 In plain English please for the naval-impaired amongst us, please 😉 (ME!)

    Regards, Hammer

    What you suggestested with the front deck and Puma’s etc is the Arapaho concept.The barges you refer to are called MexeFloats. As for vulnerability, see Falklands war hit of Argentinian Excoet missile on UK’s Atlantic Conveyor (burned out and sank).

    MSC/MHC = Minesweeper, Coastal

    AD = Destroyer Tenders
    AE = Ammunition Ships
    AF = Stores Ships
    AFS = Combat Stores Ships
    AGF = Command Ships
    AH = Hospital Ships
    AK = Cargo Ships
    AKR = Vehicle Cargo Ships
    AO = Fleet oilers
    AOE = Fast Combat Support Ship
    AOR = Fleet Replenishment Oilers
    AR = Repair Ships
    ARC = Cable Repair Ships
    ARS = Rescue & Salvage Ships
    AS = Submarine Tenders
    ATF = Fleet Ocean Tugs

    These are USN designaitons. In all cases the A stands for Auxiliary. Various other letters depend on function of ship. A “T-” in front of a designation indicates that the respective ship is operated by the Military Sealift Command (MSC) and that it is manned by a civilian crew (As opposed to US Navy and military crew).

    Full listing here and more detailed descriptions of some types here here.

    in reply to: Aussie news, nothing much. #2080315
    Wanshan
    Participant

    Ok I couldn’t find the actual design, but it’s based on Northrop Grumman’s proposal for the NSC which is pictured here:

    But … NSC is a a 418-421-foot length and 3,886-4,300 ton displacement Deepwater cutter

    in reply to: Tankers #2080394
    Wanshan
    Participant

    I have at times wondered about the usefulness of this multiple refueling capability. I mean if you are the commander of a task force are you going to pull more than one ship at a time out of the screen to refuel?

    Daniel

    Dutch-Spanish design can deliver as follows:
    – Position 1 – 4: Heavy loads up to 2 tons, diesel & aircraft fuels, water.
    – Position 3 + 4: Light loads only.
    – Position 5: Diesel fuel only (used mostly during bad weather refuelling).

Viewing 15 posts - 2,956 through 2,970 (of 3,544 total)