Because the Hurricain was “MAN MADE” and it’s part of the NEW WORLD ORDER . http://infowars.com/articles/science/weather_mod_katrina_tsunami_called_katrina.htm 2. http://infowars.com/articles/science/weather_mod_bill_to_restrict_weather_control_kucinich.htm 3. http://infowars.com/articles/science/weather_mod_nasa_funds_sci_fi_tech.htm 4. http://www.weatherwars.info/
:rolleyes: here we go again :rolleyes:
Amazing! It seems that I must actualy know something about ships after all… 😉
Thanks guys for the wonderful info!
Regards,
Hammer
Some more along these lines here
I’m sure there were major differences. Still, it isn’t that hard to picture a Type 42 fitted with a US 5″ gun, a mk13 or perhaps even a Mk29 rail lancher forward, radars as in OHP class, including 2 STIR…
Thanks guys, that is a long time for boats to be inactive and that’s not good, personally these two boats would be good as training subs only now.
Especially if you consider the climate. Deterioration would have been less in Northern Europe, I think.
Jane’s Brief
Judge orders ex-Dutch subs in Malaysia to be dismantled
A Dutch court has ordered RDM Technology Holding BV to dismantle two RNLN Zwaardvis-class submarines
————————————————————————How many are in Malaysia, how long have they been there and what were they doing there in the first place? I thought that all these subs went to Taiwan as Hi Lungs
And why has a court ruling had to be made on these subs?
Taiwan ordered and received just 2 SSK from the Netherlands.
Lots of similarity with Type 42 IMHO.
I wonder if a common hull and propulsion design could be used for both fleet replenishment ships and aircraft carriers?
When you consider that the Fort Victoria class is larger than the Invincible class I think there would be lots of benefits. The ships could be identical up to the hangar deck and then completed as a carrier or tanker.
I guess compromises would have to be made but I think it could save a lot of money.
The Spanish Principe d’Asturias the capability to refuel its escorts (RAS station on the starboard side, just behind the funnel)
Same on the Royal Thai Navy’s HTMS Chakri Naruebet (starboard side, just behind the bridge)
I think that the one with the red nose plug may be a russian 500kg FAE or else a anti-personnel cluster munition.
that’s right wan, if you read carefully I did say that it is a varient of this design.
… with nearly TWICE the displacement? Is that a variant or a different design? Anyway, would like to see imagery if available!
What are the primary tankers with USN??
Fast Combat Support Ship – AOE
Sacramento AOE 1 – class (only 1 of 4 remaining: CAMDEN AOE 2)
Supply T-AOE 6 – class (with Military Sealift Command: 4 ships)
Fleet Oilers – AO
Henry J. Kaiser T-AO 187 – class (with Military Sealift Command: 16 ships)
One technical doubt…Does any navy around the world operate tankers able to keep up with its fast combat ships (25-30kts)? Or are tankers for ever doomed to be left behind in war?
[]s Hammer
IIRC, tankers are not to keep up. The stores ships and replenishment oilers are to shuttle between fleet oilers and fast combat support ships. It’s a chain, with various types having their own place.
Most USN ships (AOR and AO) do 20 knots max. Only AOE do 26 knots but those are specifically designed with carrier groups in mind.
In my humble naval ignorance I thought that the bow area could be converted in a Large Hangar for Super Puma sized helos…and a large helipad could be set up there. The mid sections could be converted to personel (marine units) transport while maintaining the container capability abovedeck… Would it make any sense to have large folding floating barges hinged against the sides of the ship in order to simplify loading and unloading while at sea? Away from ports?…
How much more vulnerable is a civilian converted ship when compared to a dedicated military ship buit from scratch for this purpose? Would you care to dwelve on this issue for a while? What exactly is an AOE? MHCs? T-AKE? 😉 In plain English please for the naval-impaired amongst us, please 😉 (ME!)
Regards, Hammer
What you suggestested with the front deck and Puma’s etc is the Arapaho concept.The barges you refer to are called MexeFloats. As for vulnerability, see Falklands war hit of Argentinian Excoet missile on UK’s Atlantic Conveyor (burned out and sank).
MSC/MHC = Minesweeper, Coastal
AD = Destroyer Tenders
AE = Ammunition Ships
AF = Stores Ships
AFS = Combat Stores Ships
AGF = Command Ships
AH = Hospital Ships
AK = Cargo Ships
AKR = Vehicle Cargo Ships
AO = Fleet oilers
AOE = Fast Combat Support Ship
AOR = Fleet Replenishment Oilers
AR = Repair Ships
ARC = Cable Repair Ships
ARS = Rescue & Salvage Ships
AS = Submarine Tenders
ATF = Fleet Ocean Tugs
These are USN designaitons. In all cases the A stands for Auxiliary. Various other letters depend on function of ship. A “T-” in front of a designation indicates that the respective ship is operated by the Military Sealift Command (MSC) and that it is manned by a civilian crew (As opposed to US Navy and military crew).
Full listing here and more detailed descriptions of some types here here.
Ok I couldn’t find the actual design, but it’s based on Northrop Grumman’s proposal for the NSC which is pictured here:
But … NSC is a a 418-421-foot length and 3,886-4,300 ton displacement Deepwater cutter
I have at times wondered about the usefulness of this multiple refueling capability. I mean if you are the commander of a task force are you going to pull more than one ship at a time out of the screen to refuel?
Daniel
Dutch-Spanish design can deliver as follows:
– Position 1 – 4: Heavy loads up to 2 tons, diesel & aircraft fuels, water.
– Position 3 + 4: Light loads only.
– Position 5: Diesel fuel only (used mostly during bad weather refuelling).