The European governments, who armed and paid Gaddafi to hunt refugees and to get oil, should probably think carefully about their mistakes/crimes and afterwards should help to improve the situation of the victims of these dictators (Gadaffi, Mubarak etc. etc.).
Would you like to get more specific? I live in a European country, but I’m quite sure my government hasn’t payed Gadaffi a dime and we don’t get our oil from Libya. The vast majority (around 85 percent) of Libyan oil exports are sold to 4 European countries namely Italy, Germany, France, and Spain.

China’s share of Libyan oil is about the same as that of Germany, Spain.
China is a much bigger fish in some other African countries (where there are no dictators or crimes?)

And we all depend on Saudi Arabia (now there’s a democracy!)

Other info here:
http://www.eia.doe.gov/countries/
http://www.eia.doe.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=AG
http://www.eia.doe.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=LY
http://www.eia.doe.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=EG
http://www.eia.doe.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=SU
http://www.eia.doe.gov/countries/cab.cfm?fips=SA
I don’t think brazil was ever serious about using the Sao Paulo in anger. It was more about developing naval aviation culture and compentences. The Sao Paulo will probably be retired and replaced once the FX arrives in navy service.
Nic
Not so sure about that, considering this:
The former French Foch was bought to replace the aged Minas Gerais at a bargain price of $12 million USD in 2000, no aircraft included. The government had already purchased a flotilla of used A-4 Skyhawk fighters from Kuwait for US$70 million. Brazil’s A-4s are capable of carrying armament including rockets, free-fall bombs and Sidewinder air-to-air missiles, though the São Paulo currently serves mainly to train pilots to fly carrier operations.
Upgrade (2005-2010) and Sea Trials
From 2005 to 2010, the São Paulo underwent an extensive modernization program. The upgrade included: inspection and repair of the steam turbines; maintenance of the surface condensers; retubing of boilers; repair of two high-pressure compressors; revision of the alternating current electrical generator and purchase of spare parts; maintenance of pumps, valves and structural items; purchase of two API oil-water separators; installation of two water cooling units; upgrade of the chemical oxygen generator; repair and treatment of oil tanks; substitution of the Naval Tactical Data System; installation of a closed-circuit television system; installation of IFF transponder; installation of MAGE system (ESM); flight deck inspection, repair and painting; upgrade of the Optical Landing System processing unit; revision of the aircraft catapults. The upgrade was complete in July 2009, and the São Paulo was initially due to be fully operational by August 2010.
Twelve Brazilian Navy A-4 Skyhawk will also be upgraded by Embraer at a cost of $140 million. The upgrade will be similar to the ones done for the AMX and F-5EM aircraft of the Brazilian Air Force. The program includes restoring the aircraft and their current systems, as well as implementing new avionics, radar, power production, and autonomous oxygen generating systems. Possible weapons to be included in the upgrade are Python 4 and Derby AAMS.
The Brazilian Navy has contracted Marsh Aviation to convert four S-2T Turbo Trackers to AEW configuration, and four more for tanking and COD duties.
According to an article in the October 2010 issue of Air Forces Monthly, it has been confirmed that Brazil has purchased EX-USN C-1 Trader airframes, Ex-Australian and Ex-Uruguayan airframes for conversion into AEW planes and Tanker aircraft. All the planes are to upgraded to S-2T Turbo Tracker configuration with Honeywell TPE 331-14GR engines. The purchase includes 9 airframes, 2 for tanker conversion to refuel the AF-1 Skyhawks, and 3 for AEW. The rest will be for spares or cargo duties. The AEW radar requirement is to have a range of 250 miles at 25,000 feet. Operational lifespan for the airframes is to be 10 years. They are to be ready by 2011 and 2012.
The São Paulo’s SH-3 helicopter fleet is to be replaced by six ex-USN S-70B Seahawk helicopters. They were purchased in 2008, and are currently being upgraded and refurbished for delivery. The helicopters and a package of engines and support equipment are expected to be delivered in 2009.
At the end of 2010, sea trials began, and as of 2011 the São Paulo has been evaluated by the CIASA (Inspection Commission and Training Advisory). It is expected to rejoin the fleet in late 2011.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brazilian_aircraft_carrier_S%C3%A3o_Paulo_(A12)
How you would arm it would depend on what you would intend it to do.
IIRC it comes with 6x .50 cal HMGs. Personnally I wouldn’t add much more.
Perhaps add a remote controlled 25-30mm chaingun cannon next to the bridge structure. This mount could accommodate a pair of MANPADS and a pair of ATGW’s as well
For heavier stuff, I’m thinking along the lines of adding a spot in or on deck for a Stanflex module (which measures 3 metres (9.8 ft) in length, 3.5 metres (11 ft) in width, and 2.5 metres (8.2 ft) in height). Depending on role, this could hold a VLS (Mk48/56 > 6 cells > 12 ESSM) or something like a 76mm Oto naval gun. Better still would be an arms container.
Or use CAAMM rather than ESSM and so avoid any need for illumination?
Could be an option, though I think ESSM gives far better range.
Let’s assume a GTu-based plant for a minute: it needs to provide some 200,000 shp on 4 shafts. What would such a plant entail and which turbines from what source would be likely candidates? You might eve nhave a combined GTu/Steam plant as onf some RUssian navy ships…
http://eng.zmturbines.com/files/marine_eng.pdf
http://eng.zmturbines.com/
UGT25000 (DA80/DN80)= 26700 kW = 35791 hp > you’ld need at least 4, each coupled to a Shaanxi diesel engines (Chinese licens production of the MTU 20V956TB92) rated at ~6,700 hp / 5 MW. Such a ‘twin Type 052B/C’ plant would give you about 170,000 hp.
See also: http://news.kievukraine.info/2009/04/ukraine-powers-chinese-carriers.html
Argentina doesn’t have the resources for either. Hell, at this stage she would be lucky. To purchase some secondhand 4th Generation Fighters. Just to replace it’t current fleet of Skyhawks! (and that doesn’t look good):(
Either? I was only referring to 3rd hand Gorshkov, eventually. There’s probably still some A7’s around which could be souped up.
Didn’t the Rafale have issues operating for the Foch? If, memory serves me seem like it was a weight issue and/or something to do with the catapults???
Rafale proto’s were tested from this class of ship.
But they’re building both large & complex civilian vessels. Tankers, bulk carriers, container ships & complex vessels for the oil industry, such as drillships. Also oil rigs. They have the skills & yards. With foreign partners who know how to build a carrier, they could do it.
Atlantico Sul is building 150K dwt tankers in its 400 x 73 x 12 metre dock. I think that’s big enough.
Estaleiro da Bahia has a new 360 x 130 x 12 metre dock building, planned to be complete this year. I think it may be floodable in two sections, i.e. effectively two 360 x 65 x 12 metre docks.
Sermetal (Rio de Janeiro) has a 350 x 65 x 10 m dock
Arsenal de Marinha do Rio de Janeiro (navy dockyard) has a 254.6 & 36 & 15.5 metre dock, Dique Almirante Régis. São Paulo fits in it (just). There are photos. http://www.mar.mil.br/amrj/ct_am246.htm Too small for a 60K ton carrier, but can handle LHDs, etc.
Thx for clearing that up 😉
Looks like heat efflux from the funnel group there. Interesting shot!.
It does. QUestion is, what exactly is generating it? Some have suggested this is indication of a new GTu-based main powerplant. However, IIRC, the Kuznetsov has a total of 15 diesel generator sets on board (in addition to her steam plant of 8 boilers and 2 turbines): where do these vent, and could a number of them combined produce this efflux (< love that word ;-)?
I understand Argentina would really like one of the CVFs when it comes on the market.:):eek:
Can they afford anything?
What if -Vikramaditya becomes available after India build its 3rd carrier at home (about when would that be?).
They’re building diesel subs under French guidance and looking to graduate to building nuclear subs by 2020. Building a carrier in 2030 with French assistance hardly seems impossible? :confused:
Hell, they could do both. Buy CVF in 2020 and operate as a two-carrier navy out till 2030 when Sao Paulo is replaced by an indigenous vessel. 😎
In 2008, DCNS also won a bid to supply four diesel-electric Scorpène-class boats to Brazil. [24] These four vessels will be constructed at Sepetiba Bay, close to Rio de Janeiro, and DCNS will provide the hull for a fifth vessel that Brazil intends to use as a basis for developing its first nuclear-powered submarine.
Some allege that the modular construction of the Scorpène would allow for the installation of a nuclear propulsion system.[21] It is unclear to what extent DCNS might be involved in such an adaptation as France has never exported nuclear propulsion systems. Even in the case of Brazil, where DCNS will provide the hull for a vessel that the Brazilians intend to develop into a nuclear-powered submarine, France is not transferring any of the components that can be used in the propulsion mechanism itself.[3] However, the French Navy does operate the world’s smallest nuclear submarine class, Le Rubis. With a submerged displacement of 2,680 tons, it is not significantly larger than a Scorpène-class boat of up to 2,000 tons.[22] The latter with its modular design could potentially incorporate a small reactor with a design similar to the one used in Le Rubis.
http://www.nti.org/db/submarines/france/export.html
In the near future, Brazil plans to begin constructing a new class of five diesel submarines.[1]— These submarines are to be a further step in the eventual creation of a fleet of nuclear-powered attack boats, which will use the same hull as the new diesel boats. According to Brazilian reports in late May 2004, a special budget of approximately $7.8 million was to be released immediately for the completion of the land-based nuclear reactor prototype RENAP-11 (Reator Naval de Potência de 11 Megawatts), which was expected to become operational in 2005.[2]— The RENAP-11 will then be modified for use in the SNAC-2 nuclear-powered submarine program (which will reportedly require a 48 megawatt PWR reactor).[2,3] As a follow-up to a 2008 defense cooperation agreement, the Brazilian Navy signed detailed contracts in late 2009 with the French naval manufacturer Directorate of Shipbuilding and Services (DCNS). These contracts included technology transfers and construction assistance for four Scorpene-class diesel-electric attack submarines, as well as one nuclear powered vessel. With the exception of the first boat, all submarines will be built entirely in Brazil. The first Scorpene-class vessel is expected to leave the drydock around 2015, while the nuclear submarine’s construction is planned to be finished by 2021 and will incorporate the RENAP 11
http://www.nti.org/db/submarines/brazil/index.html
Seems a little conflicted … but don’t rule out that thenuclear boat hull not be built in Brazil. Moreover, these are relatively small boats, which underscores my earlier points about corvettes and frigates: limited shipbuilding capability (is there even a dock big enough in Brazil to accommodate an assembling 60k ton carrier?)
Most likely they’ll build one themselves with French design assistance.
Na, they’ve only built small frigates and large corvettes thusfar.
Brazil had included the Su-35 (Su-27M) in its 2001 F-X program to select a future fighter for its air force. Postponed before completion and subsequently cancelled in early 2005, Brazil relaunched its tender for 36 new fighters in 2008, dubbed F-X2. Total requirement has been stated to be 120 aircraft to be delivered from 2014 onwards. Although considered in the first round of the selection process based on RFI comparisons, the Su-35 did not make it to the second round. This represents the first lost opportunity for the new Su-35. Brazil will make its final decision between Dassault’s Rafale, Saab’s Gripen NG and Boeing’s Super Hornet Block II in 2010.
http://www.milavia.net/aircraft/su-35/su-35.htm
Any new carrier would have to be able to accommodate either Rafale or Superbug (not so sure ther will be a Naval Gripen NG forthcoming)
Could Brazil be the perfect choice for the LCA or should I say the N-LCA??? As who else offers a Naval Fighter that could operate from the small decks of the Sao Paulo. (i.e. ex-Foch)
Uhm… France (Rafale)
Uhm .. BEA Systems (a cross between the T-45 Goshawk and the Hawk 100/200)
Uhm … Brazil (Aversion of their AMX-ATA)
But who says Brazil will stay with Sao Paolo / Foch? Should they buy a new, larger carrier, that can do so from France, but they could also do so from India or – considering PLAN maval personnel trains on board Sao Paolo – from China.
Brazil plans to select a new Navy fighter by 2013
Brazil defense Minister Nelson Jobim has confirmed that the winner of the FX-2 contest will also be selected for the Brazilian Navy which should order 24 new fighters in 2013.
This squadron will be the first step of the renewal of the Brazilian navy aviation and should be followes by the acquisition of a 60,000 t. aircraft carrier due to enter service between 2027 and 2031.As explained in this article, the French ship builder DCSN is already promoting one of its PA2 designs for this project. The only serious contender to the French ship would be the British CVF whose second unit, the prince of Wales, could be sold by the MoD to Brazil
Anyway the fact that the 24 navy fighters will be of the same type as their Air Force counterparts, probably weaken the Saab offer due to the fact that the Gripen-N is still on the drawing board, leaving Dassault and Boeing alone for the final round of FX-2.
Meanwhile Luiz Marinho, the Mayor of San Bernado and a key personality for the Tranfer of technology part of the FX-2 project, is visiting the Dassault and Thales facilities in France (after a trip in Sweden last November).
Source : DefesaNet (Google translation)
Every time I see that picture I think to myself that I’d pay real money to see what happens if he fired that. 😀
He’ld probably move faster backaward firing the gun, then motoring forward 😉