From http://www.ab-ix.co.uk/dh89.pdf
6447 Toc by RAF as R2486 under Contract 981944/39 at 8 MU 28.7.39. To RAE Farnborough [for trials?] 5.9.39. To 2 E&WS Yatesbury 3.10.39; renamed 2 SS 26.8.40. To ATA, White Waltham 12.3.43. To DH for overhaul 29.10.44. To Coastal Command Comm Flight, Northolt 19.1.45; based Leavesden wef 12.4.45. To RAF Northern Ireland Comm Flight, Sydenham [undated]. To 5 MU 4.11.46. Sold 25.8.47 to Brooklands Aviation Ltd. Regd G-AKJY (CofR 11986) 22.12.47 to Brooklands Aviation Ltd, Weybridge (based Shoreham). CofA 9937 issued 13.5.48. New CofR No R2259 issued .50. Cld 8.2.54 & regd 18.2.54 to WS Shackleton Ltd. London W1. Regn cld 7.4.54 as sold in French Algiers. Inspected Toussus 15.4.54. Regd F-OAPT 22.6.54 (CofA 11.6.54) to Societe Aerotechnique, Algiers. Regd 30.9.57 to Societe Generale d’Affretements Aeriens [SGAA/Air Fret], Algiers. CofA suspended Geryville 2.3.60. Regd 29.3.60 to Societe Cie Generale de Transports en Algerie [CGTA], Algiers (or Blida) for spares. Regn cld 20.9.61 as destroyed.
6459 Toc by RAF as R5923 under Contract 21547/39 at 2 E&WS Yatesbury 13.10.39; renamed 2 SS 26.8.40. Swung on take-off and hit fence Yatesbury 22.4.41. Soc 29.4.41.
6461 Toc by RAF as R5925 under Contract 21547/39 at 2 E&WS Yatesbury 6.10.39; renamed 2 SS 26.8.40. To DH for repairs 7.10.42; to 18 MU 13.2.43. To 24 Squadron, Hendon 14.5.43. To Metropolitan Communications Squadron, Hendon 8.9.44. Soc 31.12.45 as Cat E.
Lovely photos 🙂 Is that a Fairchild Argus behind the Yaks? Looks a really nice scheme.
Seems the engines were produced.There’s an article on the Praga in the Air-Britain Archive of September 2011 in which it states –
“Hills laid down a production line of 35 examples (of the Praga)…Of these 25 were registered in the UK, 3 in Australia and 7 were not completed….”
“In a number of cases, the Jowett-built Praga engines gave trouble and were replaced by 2-cyl 40hp Aeronca JAP J-99 engines.”
Thanks Mike
I think the prototype was indeed the only one with slats – further than that I don’t know.
Dunlop’s own aircraft tyre website seems to back the Britannia suggestion –
http://www.dunlopaircrafttyres.com/products/size-search.aspx
If you put the size ( I just put 32 cos it didn’t work with 32×8.8) in the search box then click Select beside the Britannia, you get a lot of other info.
Hope there’s something there of help.
Thanks for the info and link – will definitely be watching 🙂
17.10 BST I believe?
We came in from the north-west through one of the nicer underpasses in Glasgow tastefully decorated with artwork of a transport theme 🙂 Unfortunately didn’t test the canteen out!
We came in from the north-west through one of the nicer underpasses in Glasgow tastefully decorated with artwork of a transport theme 🙂 Unfortunately didn’t test the canteen out!
No mention of the Bennie at all unless I missed it. Would make a great subject for a scale model.
Maybe I did miss it!!
http://www.urbanrealm.com/news/1350/Mini_challenge_for_Transport_Museum.html
No mention of the Bennie at all unless I missed it. Would make a great subject for a scale model.
Maybe I did miss it!!
http://www.urbanrealm.com/news/1350/Mini_challenge_for_Transport_Museum.html
Overall, I’m not sure what to make of the new museum.
Got to partially agree with what you say Meddle – I was never in the old Transport Museum so can’t compare and generally prefer older buildings to the clinical atmosphere of newer architecture. But I have certainly seen worse! My overall experience/ impression seems to have been a bit more favourable than yours and I expect we either approached from the other side or they have done a fair bit of tidying up since last summer ( or Hogweed dies off over Winter!) I tend not to interact with the interactive displays as they are often glitchy anyway. As to the display walls, I felt that worked with the motorbikes (still low enough to view properly though I didn’t like the colour-changing lights behind them) but not so much with the cars (too high making viewing and photography difficult). The vast windows let in plenty light but that combined with the green walls confused my camera on occasions ( more likely showed up a lack of photography skills lol). Yes, a mix of good and bad where the building is concerned but still fascinated by the range of exhibits. Definitely needs some aviation content though to be complete.
Didn’t think the view too bad –
Overall, I’m not sure what to make of the new museum.
Got to partially agree with what you say Meddle – I was never in the old Transport Museum so can’t compare and generally prefer older buildings to the clinical atmosphere of newer architecture. But I have certainly seen worse! My overall experience/ impression seems to have been a bit more favourable than yours and I expect we either approached from the other side or they have done a fair bit of tidying up since last summer ( or Hogweed dies off over Winter!) I tend not to interact with the interactive displays as they are often glitchy anyway. As to the display walls, I felt that worked with the motorbikes (still low enough to view properly though I didn’t like the colour-changing lights behind them) but not so much with the cars (too high making viewing and photography difficult). The vast windows let in plenty light but that combined with the green walls confused my camera on occasions ( more likely showed up a lack of photography skills lol). Yes, a mix of good and bad where the building is concerned but still fascinated by the range of exhibits. Definitely needs some aviation content though to be complete.
Didn’t think the view too bad –
You can say that again. The Scots seem far more dedicated to commemorating their engineering prowess too.
Yes and the Transport Museum does impress upon you how much was designed and built up here. A point that comes across really well.
You can say that again. The Scots seem far more dedicated to commemorating their engineering prowess too.
Yes and the Transport Museum does impress upon you how much was designed and built up here. A point that comes across really well.