You are mistaken. There was no option of selling “a few dozen new build M2K’s” [sic]. India had not requested it. Dassault offered it,….
Nope not the way it happened. India asked for new build M2K’s, Dassault over-quoted and then tried to up-sell in to the Rafale, and managed to ignite the competitive bid clauses in the process.
The problem was created by them, the IAF would have been happy if Dassault had been satisfied with the sale of a few dozen new build M2Ks.
Can you provide any realistic, official figures, especially for Tejas?
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, which manufactures the Tejas, has quoted Rs 162 crore per fighter as its latest price. Amortising the entire development cost on the envisioned 344 fighters (IAF: 294; Navy: 50), the Tejas would cost Rs 209 crore ($33.5 million) per fighter.
Tejas = $33 m AFTER amortizing all development costs – or ~ $25/26 m if development costs are written off in the development budget.
MKI = $65 m
Rafale = $120+ m
🙂
Don’t feel sorry for yourself or for India, because I certainly don’t have any sympathy for the country. It’s pretty simple, India accepted Dassault’s offer which indicates India were/are fine with the overall deal, or, and… Dassault accepted India’s demands and requirements and price tag and the deal was done which would indicate both sides came to an agreement. It does not indicate no one crapped on or mugged another and besides, two totally different deals.
Au contraire mon ami, I feel bad for Dassault. I’d like the Rafale in IAF colors and they’ve messed it up.
One remembers just before the L1 bidder was announced for the MMRCA, a Dassault Official stated to India that; ‘Select Rafale as L1 now, and we’ll negotiate the terms afterwards.’ (words to that affect). Indian officials accepted, Dassault/France and every other contender knew India’s demands… So whom is to blame for that now that the discussions are seeming to be hitting numerous obstacles?… Dassault made a bold move with that shot, and credits due where its due, it paid off… Maybe India should have looked ahead more, they certainly jumped the gun that time.
No, those were always the terms of the competition, L1 bidder would negotiate terms AFTER being selected. They just need to offer the right terms and prices to the buyer.
No, in the real world, both compromise.
India, with it’s own space programme, still receives aid annually from the UK, that is an indulgence not a necessity. The Rafale on the other hand, as a whole and what potential it brings to India, not just the aircraft but to India’s industry, is quite the opposite. Look at the bigger picture, there are reasons why India want such a huge amounts of an industry boost.
Right now the position is India has stopped compromising, the ball is in Dassault’s court. BTW one of the sticking points is how much technology they will actually transfer and how much they want to send a CKD kits. If Dassault cannot get it act in order these negotiations could drag on forever, until eventually Dassault or India give up on the sale and simply walk away.
Ah – the aid bugbear! I don’t know what it is with you UK’ians and aid to India? First you force it on us and then everyone is upset you give it to us! How droll!
Anyway you’ll be happy to know UK is completely ending its “aid” to India in 2015. Yayyy!
US based = MUST follow US laws = dodgy supplier based on previous US embargo’s against India
How does it matter? Libya was hardly a realistic modern AA environment.
Rafale costs are high, and has greater baggage wrt supplier relaibility – in either/or scenario PAK-FA is better
1 Rafale = 2MKI or 4 Tejas. Squadron strength will actually be better if the Rafale is not purchased.
Does India have an M2K line?
IAF don’t have a Rafale, and they need the M2K to continue on, so Dassault mugged India for 2.4 billion delighted at the 2.4 b in their bank, but crapped on their future 20 b deal.
India had a specific set of demands for the competitors of the mmrca competition. Dassault does not want to keep those terms now that it is the ‘sole’ vendor again. Just like they tried to mug India for few dozen new build M2K.
My friend it seems you seem to think the buyer with the money needs to compromise, while in the real world its the other way round. Its always the seller who will compromise.
A good product does not mean I will open the safe for the seller and agree to any price and terms set by them – it is not a sellers market, and Dassault is treating it as such.
Like I mentioned before the Rafale is good, but not good enough for the buyer to compromise more than what it is willing to give right now. It is an indulgence not a necessity, Dassault seems to have forgotten that.
No good – MTCR, cant be sold to India!
MICA IR = good = MBDA = partially owned by BAE Systems = US based = dodgy supplier with regards to India
ASSM = good given the state of Libyan air defenses = unproven in combat conditions which India will face
Rafale machine interface is good, but with either/or decision, the better choice is PAK-FA for the long run.
IIRC Dassault never even got a reply from India to its offer of the M2K line.
India didn’t want the M2K line, it wanted a few dozen new build M2k’s. Dassault, failed in it’s up-sell, and is failing to convince a customer to buys its goods now. BTW that customer really likes its goods, and despite that they are have failed to close the sale so far.
Its Dassault’s problem to solve, not India’s.
I’m just quoting the highlighted part.
well, nothing prevents India from buying French weapons (which will bring you commonality with the M2Ks you just modernized) which can’t be embargoed by anyone except France (and even that can be discussed as usually it’s pretty low tech compared to the aircraft itself, so India could make them on itself…) even more, India can also ask Dassault to integrate weapons it wants… Russian, American, Israeli, Dassault is ready to integrate anything you want… for as long as you get the clearance from the weapons manufacturer… what’s more, while India is not necessarily a close ally of France, none of its neighbors isn’t either…
BTW what hi-tech weapons can France offer which contains only its technology without EU or US collaboration, and does not have an analogue easily available elsewhere? I really can’t think of any, would appreciate your guidance.
Funny comment, considering that delays are due to Indian process and that it’s mostly from Indian side we see complaints…
One may even wonder, considering where India comes from (russian tech, which, in electronics field had a couple of trains to catch), if India isn’t having these delays simply because nobody overthere can figure out how to manage to absorb French technology, way too advanced for their todays status… maybe they should have bought a mig after all, it would be a nice fit, just above their 60’s vintage Migs 21…
LoL – cannot understand such animosity. It’s as if you own a great number of Dassault shares!
BTW the only complaints from the Indian side is price and work-share. It’s on Dassault to satisfy India on that score, and they will get a signed contract.
Maybe they will eventually buy Russian my TooCool friend. Then again maybe they will not if Dassault is reasonable. 😀
I was here too.
You probably also remember the sequence of events prior to this
The IAF wanted the M2K, and enquired about it
Dassault quoted a high price
There was a counter offer and so, and so forth…
Then Dassault said it wanted to close the M2K line and offered the Rafale at a higher price instead of the M2K
India initiated a competitive bidding process as the M2K would no longer be available and procurement rules required a competitive process be initiated
Dassault entered the Rafale instead into the bidding process, and closed the M2K line
It’s on the seller to provide their goods and services at prices the buyer will find attractive. If they want to up-sell they should madke sure they offer it at what feels reasonable to the buyer. They probably thought India was desperate for the M2K or western tech and over-sold it.
They shot themselves in the foot, and now here we are! Too bad!
The Rafale is a good airplane, but not so good that any price can be paid and unreasonable compromises can be made.
Again the process is what it is. What is was, is irrelevant. Complaining and snarking at India will not change it. Dassault knew what it was when it entered the competition.
Then the whole point about the availability of advanced weapons is lost with low tech weapons, and with an either/or choice the PAK-FA is the better alternative.