dark light

Barry Scott

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 393 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Iran completes design phase of stealth aircraft #2466600
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    It was affordable program-wise. But that did not include large upfront costs for research and development, which took the better part of one decade.
    Also, the F-117 profited from many off-the-shelf components, especially engine, equipment and avionics. All stuff unavailable for the Iranians.
    Finally, the F-117 is not survivable versus reasonably modern and integrated air defense.

    So, developing an F-117 like aircraft may be a nice achievement, but entirely wasted effort if Iran is not about to take one Pakistan.

    To take on the USA or even Saudi Arabia (which is supplied with western tech), they must close such a huge technology gap, that the upfront investment is too high. So the government, notoriously short of cash, will stuff the idea and rather put resources into propaganda to fool some of the more simply minded people, who think that some Harvard-graduates can put together a stealthy aircraft.

    flex297 and some others are successfully convinced.

    I actually agree with what you’re saying 100% but i was merely point out it was quite cheap and i should add very cheap considering the capabilities it offered (the 117 that is).

    in reply to: Iran completes design phase of stealth aircraft #2466603
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Amraam will be replaced by meteor

    Seems like its been years we’ve been hearing that now, 5 – 7 years perhaps?

    in reply to: Iran completes design phase of stealth aircraft #2466707
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    This is my pick. Even USA struggle to combine high speed AND stealth. A sub-sonic sub-LO a/c OTOH should be within reach.
    European countries are building sub-sonic VLO a/c with very reasonable budgets.

    The F-117 was very cheap too from what I understand.

    in reply to: F-111 and Cruising Speeds #2466710
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Once more APA has confused and complicated another thread with its garbage reports, can we please start banning those who reference or link to APA for the sanity of the forum.

    in reply to: Top Gun -The Movie Versus Reality #2466722
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Ahh Top Gun

    Never forget when i was in final year of high school having a discussion with friends on fighter planes, one mate starts saying the Mig-28 is the best plane in the world, he got his back up and refused to believe it wasn’t real, still adamant it was best plane in the world, even when we showed him an Air forces monthly article on the Aggressor program he still stuck to his guns

    I remember in the movie at the end right before they went to combat, James Tolkien (admiral) saying the Mig-28 is equipped with the exocet attack missile, Soviet jet with french anti ship missiles lol

    Funny story that about the Mig-28 classmate, i liked that.

    in reply to: F-35B or F-35C for the Indian Navy #2045645
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Actually if you time the overhauls right you will get 3 ships available for more time that.

    Ante my friend, you really need to listen to what these guys are telling you. You simply won’t get the type of maintanence free carrier you are hoping in this day and age, even if things do seem on the surface to be extremely advanced and maintenance free.

    in reply to: UK launches Team Complex Weapons scheme with six projects #2467443
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    If it ever gets to be a problem they can always shove another 16 cells in.

    Its hardly as easy as you make out, these ships aren’t built from lego you know and cannot simply be modified at the drop of a hat.

    in reply to: Top Gun -The Movie Versus Reality #2467460
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Up to your usual standard, I see. Are you really that ignorant, or is it just that you have a total disregard for the truth?

    Among the things the USSR was good at were –
    1) Financing & producing propagandistic war films. More than you could shake a stick at. The reasons are obvious.
    2) Getting a TV in every household. Think about how centralised authoritarian regimes work, & you (sorry, not you, but most people) will very quickly work out why.

    I was having a wind up, of course theres always one fool who excitedly takes the bait though…

    in reply to: UK launches Team Complex Weapons scheme with six projects #2467468
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    The Fireshadow design is
    compatible with the space envelope of T45s
    Sylver VLS.”

    Well thats just great, the T-45 air defence destroyer will have its pathetic amount of A-A missiles lowered even more. Freaking morons in the MOD.

    in reply to: Supercruising #2467552
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Not too difficult is it? Everyone with some mind can “translate” the US procurement decisions. By the way, those ones with all data at hand. 😀

    Yep, and you just happen to always know best from the comfort of your armchair. Sad but true. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Supercruising #2467566
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Or to make it short: the time of high performance fighters is generally over, as the chance of being involved in a conflict with such adversaries is small, and even if the chance of killing the enemy air force by other means is high.

    Crystal Ball, you must own one.

    in reply to: F-35B or F-35C for the Indian Navy #2045781
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    It would have to be a truely revolutionary carrier design to be able to have what Anti requests, 3 carriers going all at once out of a force of 3 carrriers. Not going to happen for a hundred years, if ever.

    in reply to: Supercruising #2467604
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    The problem is, that the present F-22 will not operate in a mission enviroment it was designed for. BVR-weapons and look-down/shoot-down capability were tailored to the arial situation in Central Europe. The F-22 had to engage Flankers and Fulcrums at medium heights or even high up, when those are backed-up by SAMs. The USA did stick to strike packages at medium heights, when most other NATO-members did still prefer low level strikers or as the US did with their bombers.
    To do “supercruise” in an usefull manner the F-22 has to stay high up, when it has to face the most problems against low-level opponents today. In that case “supercruise” is of little use. By the way the Russians had find out something similar before, when they did add subsonic capability to the MiG-25, which did become the MiG-31. In that years you could find multi-layered attacks from strikers/bombers with stand-off-weapons, which had to reach a firing point only or to strike packages to overcome the defense of a prime target in numbers. “Cheap” robots could saturate defenses, when they could be outsmarted by the defenders too. So all kinds of attack were kept to keep the tactical flexibility from that. In Cold War times no side did assume to overhelm the other side in short notice, when both were aware, that every attacker would run into a time-force-problem. Both sides had planned to reach their main military goals within 30 days or to run into an atomic disaster.
    In the meanwhile the USA had learned, that the military world had changed in general and that there is no longer something in need like the F-22. The Europeans have transformed their air-superiority fighters into strikers, when the F-22 failed to do so with the FA-22B. The F-35 is more than enough for the future needs. The most important message from that is, there is no longer some need in “supercruising”, when stealth is still important, despite the high costs and limitations from that.

    Oh come on now you’re just being silly again, F-22 has no mission, European fighters are no longer air defense fighters but strike fighters (tell that to typhoon pilots who fly intercepts) ,the F-22 has no strike capability (except 8 SDB with DIME warheads or two 2000ib class JDAMs) etc etc.
    It really is getting beyond a joke how an armchair expert can keep being so right in his own mind whilst those in the know, who operate and fly these jets are regarded as simple confused fools who don’t know what they are doing with them.

    in reply to: Iran completes design phase of stealth aircraft #2467700
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    What was plywood about the Ekranoplan? The so-called ‘Caspian Sea Monster’ was entirely real, the technology works, and the Lun-class was actually quite capable, but it didn’t offer what the new leadership was after and it was ditched. Ekranoplans are no more fiction without attached capability than the J-10; the reason they were not in the end a successful mass-deployed platform was because there simply wasn’t the demand for them.

    No he meant the Iranian Ekranoplan, the flying lawnmower.

    in reply to: F-35B or F-35C for the Indian Navy #2046148
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    They have already purchased Fulcrums which are more than fine for them… there is just not enough capacity or need for them to be using two naval fighters. In fact I believe only reason you posted this dribble is to start a flame.. bad Scooter bad *hits scooter over the nose with rolled newspaper

    As for MIRCA, the fact that PAF uses F16 makes it silly to even suggest it as an option. Super Bugg on the other hand is in the running.. but for my money it will be shoot off between Rafale and Gripen

    The Gripen, as nice as it is will be far to weak to fight off the competition.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 393 total)