dark light

Barry Scott

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 393 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LM about the F-35s A2A performance #2450225
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    F-15 is a Mach 1.7 fighter with 6 Amraams in full A/B – not a Mach 2.3-2.5 fighter.

    I thought Mach 1.7 was the limit with a fuel tank under each wing and that Mach 2 is acheivable with normal weapons load.

    in reply to: Stealth Vs Stealth engagement #2449868
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Do the IRSTs have the option to sweep up and down and side to side like a radar does and can they be tied directly to a radar as in as the radar performs for example a 30 by 30 degree sweep with the IRST doing the same too at the same time?

    in reply to: Stealth Vs Stealth engagement #2449964
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Your eye and IR sensors are very similar as their acuity is limited by the power of the optics and number of pixels in the retina/focal plane array. If the heat-emitting target is less than a pixel can resolve (due to small emissions or long distance), it goes undetected.

    DSP satellites in geosynchronous orbit use high powered telescope with extremely limited field of view to detect smallish heat emitters on Earth. Likewise, IRSTs like Pirate and OSF can see long distances, but with a narrow field of view (lots of FPA pixels looking through an arc only a few degrees wide). The narrow field of view hinders IRST’s usefulness for providing situational awareness at close quarters. Unless your IRST is lucky enough to stumble across a stealth airplane, the narrow field of view could cause it to go undetected.

    Conversely, DAS uses fish-eye type optics to detect threats nearby, but range suffers as the individual pixel in the FPA has to cover a much larger arc than it’s IRST counterpart. The stealthy adversary would likely have to be within 40km before it is detected by DAS.

    Interesting stuff if a bit over my head in the tech area. What you’re saying is that basically all these figures banded about for various IRST’s don’t really tell the full picture at all, another case of misleading brochure figures being taken for granted it seems.

    in reply to: LM about the F-35s A2A performance #2450026
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Wrong. The TVC are especially usefull at high speed. Paul Metz can explain it to you: The funny part is that Paul Metz (the chief tst pilot of F 22) gave this interview to our friend Dr. kopp :p http://www.ausairpower.net/API-Metz-Interview.html

    Thanks for that interesting bit of info from Mr Metz.

    in reply to: Syria 'fires on Israel warplanes' #2450030
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    In the meantime, Jordan plan to buy French nuclear reactor.

    http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/Jordan_to_buy_French_nuclear_reactor_999.html

    Jordan is also home to the largest group of Palestinian exiles in the world.

    Thats cool, the Jordanians are being honest and open about it, will no doubt allow inspectors in should they want to and Jordan is a nation known to very much dislike terrorism, refer to last iraq war and Mr Zarqarwi about that. Good for Jordan for doing things the correct way, unlike Syria.

    in reply to: Breaking VH-71 Story? #2450220
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Edited to remove answer to removed question upon request of Black11, couldn’t delete the whole post for some reason.

    in reply to: TRANSFORMERS (the movie) #2450428
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    I read that Jetfire is in it and is going to be an SR-71 Blackbird! 🙂

    in reply to: TRANSFORMERS (the movie) #2450445
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    The new trailer looks pretty good, some F-18’s and blackhawks feature in it for a few seconds so this post is somewhat aviation related

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmgbbGJW6ZE

    in reply to: Stealth Vs Stealth engagement #2450448
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    They’d have to make use of ESM/IRST/other sensor platforms datalinked,

    Quick question: Do IRST and DAS type systems have the ability to see a target obscured by thick cloud cover? I would have thought not but if someone knows for definate on that it would be good to know the answer.

    in reply to: Syria 'fires on Israel warplanes' #2450469
    Barry Scott
    Participant
    in reply to: Meteor integration delayed #2450515
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    This is the trouble when people pin thier hopes on a weapon to make the much needed difference in combat and it fails to arrive on time you’re left caught short and in an unpleasent situation if you have to face a half decent enemy.

    in reply to: US Aircraft Carrier Vulnerable #2042974
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    A jet landing exerts just a little less force than something where up to half a tonne of high explosives and two to four tonnes of missile behind it impacting at Mach 2.2, don’t you think?

    Why of course it would wouldn’t it Einstein but the point I was making is those decks can’t be exactly wafer thin now can they.

    in reply to: LM about the F-35s A2A performance #2450597
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    I’m not exactly sure what you are trying to achieve here, seeing as though you are already sufficiently convinced of this unknown radar systems, superiority…

    Thats nothing knew, he’s also convinced of the completely unknown PAK-FA’s superority over the F-35 without having anything at all to base that on.

    in reply to: LM about the F-35s A2A performance #2450637
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Someone like you shouldn’t call anyone else troll. You usually write oneliners, point your finger at others and contribute nothing to any discussion.

    Like you just have.

    in reply to: LM about the F-35s A2A performance #2450649
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Fed up with talking to complete muppets now

    Shouldn’t talk to yourself then kiddo.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 393 total)