dark light

Barry Scott

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 393 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Is the F35 a waste of time? Part II #2488032
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    It was more drive home the point that targets will be equipped with an ole AK-47

    Good luck waiting 45 minutes for your prop or UCAV to arrive. Listen, go speak to troops who have fought out there, they DO NOT appeciate the thought of some dumb a** slow prop plane taking 45 mins to arrive and would rather a fast mover show up in 5 or 10 minutes and blend the group of sometimes up to 250 very heavily armed ‘goat herders’ to mush. Those guys on the ground don’t give a hoot if the enemy is armed with AK’s as the simple fact is an AK round is still lethel, lets not forget the RPGs and IEDs too which convieniantly slipped past your post, they just want fast effective support that arrives as soon as possible and the only way to do that at the moment is the fast movers, hell even A-10s are to slow for many troops liking, taking alot longer to arrive on station.
    It simply cannot be stressed enough that a prop is freakin useless to the guys on the ground.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VII #2488058
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    So the Indians are agreeing on the Russian version?
    And rubbish that ‘the design won’t be much different bar the avionics fit’. It’ll have an entire extra seat for a start, and as a result different wings and control surfaces, and be optimised far more for a role where it does not work so often with GCI help, as well as loading different weapons. I’d say that’s pretty different actually.

    Yeah so you’ve been told it’ll be different in those areas, no proof what so ever though for that is there. Also to make those changes the design still has to be agreed, its no good Russia for ecample building it with no capability for a n extra seat in there like the Indians wants hence they would have to agree on a design that allows for the extra seat changes if need be.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VII #2488064
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    So the Indians are agreeing on the Russian version?

    Well they would have to agree to some extent yes, If they didn’t then the two designs may have bee so far apart India may have said we don’t it like that, much like the British had some say in the F_35 design, if the two couldn’t agree at an early stage there would have been real problems.

    in reply to: Is the Rafale Irrelevant? #2488068
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    I don’t think anyone else (meaning nations) found the Rafale very good despite what the Rafale zealots will tell you. Its international sales record proves this and has been abysmal.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VII #2488088
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Bingo.

    It doesn’t mention it being the Indian version being the version to have finally been agreed on the design for, if it did I’d say yeah you’re right but as it is it could be the main version, afterall the design won’t be much different bar the avionics fit.

    in reply to: Is the Typhoon a waste of time? #2488703
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Do i look like your nanny to you boy?

    I posted and article which many of US actualy read online before it vanished from the internet (as many other did BTW), end of story.

    WHO is WE? You and Smith&Wesson?

    😀

    :D:D

    :D:D:D
    I hope you dont try to imply everyone here is at your level are you?

    Since you can’t argue as to WHY this isn’t technicaly possible how about you give it a rest he?

    You angry frothing posts are making little sense now Son.

    in reply to: The PAK-FA Saga Episode VII #2488711
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Indian Air force chief states that Inter-Governmental agreements for design and development of fifth generation fighter aircraft has been concluded.
    http://www.ptinews.com/pti%5Cptisite.nsf/0/5C9B1310979EB2C6652575410041C618?OpenDocument

    So from that it seems they have only just agreed on the design and development, two very important words that show this machine is not yet even built yet in the prototype stage considering they have only just “agreed on the design” to use the Indian Airforce Chiefs words. Seems futher delayed then anyone previously thought 😮

    in reply to: Is the Typhoon a waste of time? #2488724
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Yes it was photoshoped because i screenedshoted it myself but it was not RETOUCHED, as for you dude, what is perfectly possible is that you’re going to be very popular with the Legoland forumers.:D

    But still no proof for the 100* claim? Apart from someone on the payrole of the French so we can take it with a massive pinch of salt as they are the ones trying to sell the aircraft.

    in reply to: Is the Typhoon a waste of time? #2488727
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Why would you want to operate over hostile airspace when you could operate outside it with standoff weapons? Storm Shadow, Taurus etc I say, why let an aircraft, and most importantly, the pilot take the risk of getting his ar$e shot to bits when you can let the missile take the risk. Again, like I said before, do a little research before you knock it. :rolleyes:

    The likes of Storm shadow and other standoff munitions are all well and good for fixed targets, for a tank battalion, less good to useless. No good relying on stand off systems if you have to gain air superiority over hostile airspace to protect your own ground forces either.

    in reply to: Is the Typhoon a waste of time? #2488737
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    READ: 207 kt, Alpha = 77* AoA. (And a D.E.A.D F-16).

    http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r279/sampaix/207-77.jpg

    Its perfectly possible that the image in question is a photoshop, besides is does not proof 100 AOA as he said it could do.
    Try again kid.

    in reply to: Is the Typhoon a waste of time? #2488853
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Jesus! Ignorant or what! Instead of saying stuff like that, why don’t you do a little research about Typhoon, it’s easy, google it, check out the official website. look it up!

    :rolleyes:

    Hold up, we have one group of people saying it was never meant to operate over hostile airspace with S-300 and 400s yet now its changed to be a multirole strike fighter. I’m curious, do you have to wait for the enemy armour to move onto British land before the Typhoon can attack it because thats whats implied by many who say it will not and was not meant to operate over hostile airspace. Unless of course you’re planning to bomb yourself it sounds pretty much useless for A-G if it cannot fight its way to where the ground targets and if theres any sort of decent air defenses there in hostile lands its stuffed. Sounds great! :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Is the Typhoon a waste of time? #2488879
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Unless you actualy flew it and were there when they tried with this guy i don’t see what’s so funny about it.:diablo:

    Ok I will break it down for you to understand in a nice easy and basic manner.
    The quotes you put up about the rafale that come from a Dassault flight-test pilot are quite potentially fiction because by your very own reasoning (and many others) he is employed by the company who builds and sells the jet hence he has to offer up such promising statements or face being shown the door.
    Remember this is what you and others said about Mr Beesleys quotes so it applies equally here as well. The fact he added in some figures do not change anything at all, you could even say he’s throwing up more BS then Mr Beesley did by adding in such unbelieveable figures whilst offering no proof at all.
    I do hope you have finally grasped the issue.

    in reply to: Is the Typhoon a waste of time? #2488938
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    Massive pinch of salt” involves NO figures.

    100* AoA and 40 kt NEGATIVE speed is already BEYHOND a Cobra maneuvre parameters.

    Basicaly you have NO argument here…:cool:

    Woooosh
    That was the sound of the point flying right past you and you don’t even realise. Pretty funny.

    in reply to: Is the F35 a waste of time? Part II #2488949
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    You really have some great arguments there.

    BTW, what was your old user name, Jon James wasn’t it?

    Looks like i hit a nerve simply because that was garbage that you wrote so I called it garbage, whats so wrong with that?

    in reply to: Is the F35 a waste of time? Part II #2488971
    Barry Scott
    Participant

    It was not meant as an attack, just voicing the reality. USA is a democracy and as you said tha people did not approve the Iraq war because it turned out to not be as easily won. Future presidents will take warning and refrain from wars that can become long and/or costly.

    The actual war was won in a few weeks, keeping the peace and getting a new administration onto its feet was the tough part but the insurgency has now been pretty much crushed thanks to adaptive troops and equipment.

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 393 total)